Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 194
Filter
1.
Neurol Clin ; 42(2): 341-373, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575256

ABSTRACT

Posttraumatic headaches are one of the most common and controversial secondary headache types. After a mild traumatic brain, an estimated 11% to 82% of people develop a postconcussion syndrome, which has been controversial for more than 160 years. Headache is estimated as present in 30% to 90% of patients after a mild head injury. Most headaches are tension-type-like or migraine-like. Headaches in civilians, soldiers, athletes, and postcraniotomy are reviewed. The treatments are the same as for the primary headaches. Persistent posttraumatic headaches can continue for many years.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion , Craniocerebral Trauma , Military Personnel , Post-Traumatic Headache , Humans , Post-Traumatic Headache/diagnosis , Post-Traumatic Headache/epidemiology , Post-Traumatic Headache/etiology , Headache/diagnosis , Headache/etiology , Athletes , Brain Concussion/complications
2.
Neurol Clin ; 42(2): xiii, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575271
3.
Headache ; 61(10): 1529-1538, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34710236

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical features of new daily persistent headache (NDPH) at an outpatient neurology clinic with a subspecialty interest in headache in Houston, Texas. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed by a neurologist subspecialty certified in headache medicine of all patients seen from September 1, 2011 through February 28, 2020 (8.5 years) with a provisional diagnosis of NDPH and abstracted charts meeting criteria for primary NDPH. RESULTS: A total of 328 patients met the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition criteria including 215 (65.5%) female patients. The mean age of onset was 40.3 years (range 12-87 years) with a mean age at first consultation in the study clinic of 42.6 years (range 12-87 years). The median [25th, 75th] duration of NDPH at initial consultation was 0.7 [0.3, 2.0] years, and at last visit, it was 1.9 [0.7, 4.8] years. The headaches were side-locked unilateral in 28/328 (8.5%). 12/328 cases (3.6%) with a thunderclap onset are reported. There was no obvious seasonal or other cyclical variation. The pain was usually moderate to severe and more often severe for the migraine phenotype (MP; 260/328 [79.3%] of cases) than for the tension-type phenotype (TTP). Precipitating factors were the following: stressful life events, 67/328 (20.4%); upper respiratory infection or flu-like illness, 33/328 (10.1%); and extracranial surgery, 5/328 (1.5%). Exacerbating or aggravating factors similar to migraine triggers were more often reported with the MP than with the TTP in this sample. For the MP, vertigo or dizziness was reported by 19/260 (7.3%) and a visual aura by 21/260 (8.1%) with descriptions provided. The prognostic types were the following for all patients: persisting (refractory), 305/328 (93.0%); relapsing-remitting, 9/328 (2.7%); and remitting (self-limited), 14/328 (4.3%). CONCLUSION: NDPH is typically of moderate to severe intensity often with migraine features without obvious seasonal or other cyclical variation. Most cases are refractory. 3.6% have a thunderclap onset often with a good response to treatment.


Subject(s)
Headache Disorders/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Dizziness , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Texas , Vertigo , Young Adult
4.
Cephalalgia ; 41(13): 1298-1309, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34148408

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To use 1) newly generated data, 2) existing evidence, and 3) expert opinion to create and validate a new cluster headache screening tool. METHODS: In phase 1 of the study, we performed a prospective study of an English translation of an Italian screen on 95 participants (45 with cluster headache, 17 with other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, 30 with migraine, and 3 with trigeminal neuralgia). In phase 2, we performed a systematic review in PubMed of all studies until September 2019 with diagnostic screening tools for cluster headache. In phase 3, a 6-person panel of cluster headache patients, research coordinators, and headache specialists analyzed the data from the first two phases to generate a new diagnostic screening tool. Finally, in phase 4 this new screen was validated on participants at a single headache center (all diagnoses) and through research recruitment (trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias only, as recruitment was essential but was otherwise low). RESULTS: In total, this study included 319 unique participants including 109 cluster headache participants (95 total participants/45 cluster headache participants in phase 1, and 224 total participants/64 cluster headache participants in phase 4). It also found 123 articles on potential screening tools in our systematic review. In phase 1, analysis of the English translation of an Italian screen generated 7 questions with high sensitivity and specificity against migraine, trigeminal neuralgia, and other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, but had grammatical and other limitations as a general screening tool. In phase 2, the systematic review revealed nine studies that met inclusion criteria as diagnostic screening tools for cluster headache, including four where sensitivity and specificity were available for individual questions or small groups of questions. In phase 3, this data was reviewed by the expert panel to generate a brief (6-item), binary (yes/no), written screening test. In phase 4, a total of 224 participants completed the new 6-item screening test (81 migraine, 64 cluster headache, 21 other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, 35 secondary headaches, 7 neuralgias, 5 probable migraine, and 11 other headache disorders). Answers to the 6 items were combined in a decision tree algorithm and three items had a sensitivity of 84% (confidence interval or 95% confidence interval 73-92%), specificity of 89% (95% confidence interval 84-94%), positive predictive value of 76% (95% confidence interval 64-85%), and negative predictive value of 93% (95% confidence interval 88-97%) for the diagnosis of cluster headache. These three items focused on headache intensity, duration, and autonomic features. CONCLUSION: The 3-item Erwin Test for Cluster Headache is a promising diagnostic screening tool for cluster headache.


Subject(s)
Cluster Headache , Migraine Disorders , Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias , Cluster Headache/diagnosis , Headache , Humans , Prospective Studies
5.
Cephalalgia ; 41(4): 427-430, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33726534
7.
Headache ; 60(10): 2526-2529, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33022759

ABSTRACT

Migraine is common in celiac disease (CD) and usually improves on a gluten-free diet (GFD). The benefit for people impacted by migraine without CD is poorly evidenced. A GFD may have adverse health consequences and is expensive.


Subject(s)
Diet, Gluten-Free , Migraine Disorders/diet therapy , Adult , Chronic Disease , Diet, Gluten-Free/adverse effects , Diet, Gluten-Free/economics , Female , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy
8.
Headache ; 60(10): 2522-2525, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33038281

ABSTRACT

Primary empty sella (PES) syndrome is a misnomer as it is not a syndrome but a radiological finding with possible endocrine abnormalities. No specific headache type has been shown to be caused by PES. Endocrine screening may be considered for asymptomatic persons with PES.


Subject(s)
Empty Sella Syndrome/diagnosis , Empty Sella Syndrome/complications , Empty Sella Syndrome/etiology , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Middle Aged , Migraine without Aura/diagnosis , Migraine without Aura/etiology , Obesity/complications , Vertigo/diagnosis , Vertigo/etiology
9.
Headache ; 60(8): 1749-1760, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32827445

ABSTRACT

Concussion and the sequelae have been controversial medico-legal issues for over 150 years. The following topics which are also important in clinical practice are discussed: definitions of concussion, neuroimaging, onset and prognosis of headaches, cognitive impairment, cognitive rehabilitation, post-traumatic stress disorder, and risk of later development of dementia.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/physiopathology , Adult , Brain Concussion/complications , Brain Concussion/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Legislation, Medical , Male , Post-Concussion Syndrome/diagnosis , Post-Concussion Syndrome/physiopathology , Young Adult
10.
Headache ; 60(2): 457-462, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31984487

ABSTRACT

Headache medicine specialists often treat VIPs but little is known about whether these encounters are different than with other patients. Questions considered include who is a VIP, should you treat a VIP like any other patient, and what are the challenges and advantages? A non-random sampling of comments is presented from headache medicine specialists. Eleven principles are presented to consider in these encounters.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Famous Persons , Headache Disorders/therapy , Physician-Patient Relations , Adult , Humans
11.
Headache ; 60(2): 318-336, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31891197

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide updated evidence-based recommendations about when to obtain neuroimaging in patients with migraine. METHODS: Articles were included in the systematic review if they studied adults 18 and over who were seeking outpatient treatment for any type of migraine and who underwent neuroimaging (MRI or CT). Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Clinical Trials were searched from 1973 to August 31, 2018. Reviewers identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the evidence in duplicate. We assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 2269 publications. Twenty three articles met inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. The majority of studies were retrospective cohort or cross-sectional studies. There were 4 prospective observational studies. Ten studies evaluated the utility of CT only, 9 MRI only, and 4 evaluated both. Common abnormalities included chronic ischemia or atrophy with CT and MRI scanning, and non-specific white matter lesions with MRI. Clinically meaningful abnormalities requiring intervention were relatively rare. Clinically significant neuroimaging abnormalities in patients with headaches consistent with migraine without atypical features or red flags appeared no more common than in the general population. RECOMMENDATIONS: There is no necessity to do neuroimaging in patients with headaches consistent with migraine who have a normal neurologic examination, and there are no atypical features or red flags present. Grade A Neuroimaging may be considered for presumed migraine for the following reasons: unusual, prolonged, or persistent aura; increasing frequency, severity, or change in clinical features, first or worst migraine, migraine with brainstem aura, migraine with confusion, migraine with motor manifestations (hemiplegic migraine), late-life migraine accompaniments, aura without headache, side-locked headache, and posttraumatic headache. Most of these are consensus based with little or no literature support. Grade C.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Neuroimaging/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Societies, Medical/standards , Humans
14.
15.
Neurol Clin ; 37(4): 707-725, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563228

ABSTRACT

Most primary headaches can be diagnosed using the history and examination. Judicious use of neuroimaging and other testing, however, is indicated to distinguish primary headaches from the many secondary causes that may share similar features. This article evaluates the reasons for diagnostic testing and the use of neuroimaging, electroencephalography, lumbar puncture, and blood testing. The use of diagnostic testing in adults and children who have headaches and a normal neurologic examination, migraine, trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, hemicrania continua, and new daily persistent headache are reviewed.


Subject(s)
Electroencephalography/methods , Headache Disorders, Primary/diagnosis , Headache Disorders, Primary/physiopathology , Migraine Disorders/diagnosis , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Neuroimaging/methods , Humans , Neurologic Examination/methods , Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias/diagnosis , Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias/physiopathology
16.
Neurol Clin ; 37(4): xiii-xiv, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563238
17.
Headache ; 59(8): 1360-1364, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31310337

ABSTRACT

Two cases are reported of migraineurs who reported Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) exacerbated while taking monoclonal antibodies to the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) ligand (fremanezumab and galcanezumab) and 1 case of new onset RP while taking the CGRP receptor antagonist (erenumab). The prevalence of primary and secondary RP, causes of secondary RP, co-morbidity with migraine, and medications which might induce or exacerbate RP are reviewed. The pathophysiology of how CGRP monoclonal antagonists might exacerbate or induce RP is discussed. The cases suggest but do not prove causation.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide/antagonists & inhibitors , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Raynaud Disease/chemically induced , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
19.
Headache ; 58(9): 1435-1441, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30362525

ABSTRACT

Patients commonly use online reviews in selecting a new physician. There have been no studies of online reviews of headache medicine physicians. To better understand headache medicine physicians' attitudes and opinions about negative reviews, 2 negative patient reviews were posted to the Southern Headache Society online discussion group and comments were requested. Twenty-two anonymous comments are provided. The strengths and inadequacies of online physician reviews in other specialties and the possible actions headache medicine physicians should take for negative reviews are discussed. A nationwide survey of online reviews of headache medicine specialists would be of interest.


Subject(s)
Headache , Internet , Patient Satisfaction , Physicians , Specialization , Headache/therapy , Humans , Physician-Patient Relations , Physicians/psychology , Qualitative Research , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...