The Value of Protocol Biopsies to Identify Patients With De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody at High Risk for Allograft Loss.

De novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) is associated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and allograft loss, yet the allograft histology associated with dnDSA remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the allograft histology associated with dnDSA in patients with serial surveillance biopsies. We retrospectively studied adult conventional solitary kidney transplant recipients from October 2007 to May 2014. The definition of dnDSA was new donor-specific antibody (DSA) with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) >1000. The incidence of dnDSA was 7.0% (54 of 771) over mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 1.9 years. Patients with dnDSA had reduced death-censored allograft survival (87.0% vs. 97.0% no dnDSA, p < 0.01). Moreover, 94% of patients received a biopsy after dnDSA (mean of three biopsies per patient). AMR was present in 25.0% and 52.9% of patients at dnDSA detection and at 1 year, respectively. Patients with both class I and II dnDSA had the highest rate of allograft loss. The higher the sum MFI at dnDSA detection, the higher the incidence of AMR. In conclusion, patients with dnDSA without AMR at time of detection may benefit from a follow-up biopsy within 1 year because AMR can be missed initially. In addition, the dnDSA class and sum MFI at baseline appear to be prognostic. The higher the sum MFI of dnDSA at baseline, the higher the incidence of AMR.

Onset and progression of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies after BK polyomavirus and preemptive immunosuppression reduction.

BACKGROUND: BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) viremia/nephropathy and reduction in immunosuppression following viremia may increase the risk of alloimmune activation and allograft rejection. This study investigates the impact of BKPyV viremia on de novo donor anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies (dnDSA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All primary renal transplants at East Carolina University from March 1999 to December 2010, with at least 1 post-transplant BKPyV viral load testing, were analyzed. Patients were negative for anti-HLA antibodies to donor antigens (tested via single antigen beads) at transplantation and at first BKPyV testing. RESULTS: Nineteen of 174 patients (11%) tested positive for BKPyV viremia. Within 24 months of BKPyV viremia detection, 79% of BKPyV-viremic patients developed dnDSA. Only 20% of BKPyV viremia-persistent cases, compared to 86% of BKPyV viremia-resolved cases, developed dnDSA (P = 0.03). Poor allograft survival was evident in BKPyV viremia-persistent patients (60% failure by 2 years post BKPyV diagnosis) and in BKPyV viremia-resolved patients with dnDSA (5-year post BKPyV diagnosis allograft survival of 48%). CONCLUSIONS: Post-transplant BKPyV viremia and preemptive immunosuppression reduction is associated with high rates of dnDSA. When preemptively treating BKPyV viremia, dnDSA should be monitored to prevent allograft consequences.

Impact of the presence and duration of donor-specific antibodies on renal function.

BACKGROUND: Although anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) is associated with graft loss, 3 things remain unclear: whether the duration and strength of DSA affect renal function; what mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) cut-off should be used; and whether the DSA effect is additive in case of multiple DSAs. METHODS: A study was made of 63 patients who received living donor kidney transplants with clonal deletion protocol and were followed up for 18 months with reduced doses of immunosuppressants. DSA was tested for monthly, using Luminex Mixed and Single Antigen beads (One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA, USA). Decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was obtained at baseline and 18 months after transplantation. Association of renal damage and DSAs was compared using several DSA models with several MFI cut-offs. RESULTS: Additive DSA models always showed better association with renal damage than comprehensive models. When calculating the DSA effect in additive models, "proxy-area under the curve" (AUC)-a triangular approximation of the actual AUC-showed better association with renal damage than did DSA duration (R(2) = 0.105 vs 0.087). Adjusting for other factors, 27% of the variation of GFR change was explained by proxy-AUC. No significant change of association occurred if the MFI cut-off level changed from 1000 to 3000. CONCLUSION: Our results support the association of DSA with development of longitudinal renal damage. The clinical interpretation may be similar at MFI cut-offs of 1000, 2000, and 3000. An additive DSA effect may be expected in patients with multiple DSAs. Our study suggests the importance of frequently checking for DSA and reducing their MFI value to minimize renal damage by the antibodies.

Reducing de novo donor-specific antibody levels during acute rejection diminishes renal allograft loss.

The effect of de novo DSA detected at the time of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and the response of DSA levels to rejection therapy on renal allograft survival were analyzed. Kidney transplant patients with acute rejection underwent DSA testing at rejection diagnosis with DSA levels quantified using Luminex single-antigen beads. Fifty-two patients experienced acute rejection with 16 (31%) testing positive for de novo DSA. Median follow-up was 27.0 +/- 17.4 months postacute rejection. Univariate analysis of factors influencing allograft survival demonstrated significance for African American race, DGF, cytotoxic PRA >20% (current) and/or >50% (peak), de novo DSA, C4d and repeat transplantation. Multivariate analysis showed only de novo DSA (6.6-fold increased allograft loss risk, p = 0.017) to be significant. Four-year allograft survival was higher with ACR (without DSA) (100%) than mixed acute rejection (ACR with DSA/C4d) (65%) or antibody-mediated rejection (35%) (p < 0.001). Patients with >50% reduction in DSA within 14 days experienced higher allograft survival (p = 0.039). De novo DSAs detected at rejection are associated with reduced allograft survival, but prompt DSA reduction was associated with improved allograft survival. DSA should be considered a potential new end point for rejection therapy.

Proteasome inhibition reduces donor-specific antibody levels.

BACKGROUND: Current antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) therapies (intravenous immunoglobulin, apheresis, rituximab, polyclonal antibodies) do not target the primary antibody producing B cells, that is, the plasma cell. We report the preliminary results from the first clinical experience with plasma cell targeted therapy with bortezomib. Bortezomib is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of plasma cell tumors (multiple myeloma). METHODS: Kidney transplant patients with mixed acute cellular rejection (ACR) and AMR episodes (by Banff '97 criteria, update 2005) were treated with bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) per dose x 4) at standard labeled doses. Patients were monitored by serial donor specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA) determinations [Luminex/Labscreen beads] and quantified by conversion to fluorescence intensity to molecules of equivalent soluble fluorescence (MESF). RESULTS: Five patients were treated with bortezomib. Each patient also had coexisting ACR. In each case, bortezomib treatment led to prompt ACR and AMR rejection reversal. DSA levels decreased significantly in all patients (except 1 patient who had short follow-up). Observed toxicities from bortezomib included a transient grade III thrombocytopenia (1 patient) and mild-to-moderate nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea (3/5 patients). Opportunistic infections were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib therapy provides effective reduction in DSA levels with long-term suppression. These preliminary results indicate that proteasome inhibition provides an effective means for reducing HLA antibody levels in transplant recipients.

Clonal deletion using total lymphoid irradiation with no maintenance immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients.

A total of 69 individuals received a kidney from a living donor after a TLI-based clonal deletion protocol with no post-transplant maintenance immunosuppression planned. If needed, immunosuppression was started on a patient-specific basis, adding one drug at a time, a strategy we AWN". call "Drugs Added When Needed," or "DAWN. Following this strategy, at last follow-up 40 of the 69 patients (58%) had to be rescued by conventional immunosuppression, 23 (33%) had to be started on daily prednisone and six (9%) remained with no maintenance immunosuppression. The overall rate of de novo donor-specific antibody produced was 36% (in 25 of the 69 patients), and mean time to detection was about four months. The incidence of acute rejection episodes that displayed humoral components was 27% (19 cases), of which 14 were pure antibody-mediated rejection, five combined antibody- and T-cell-mediated rejection, and six were episodes (9%) of pure T-cell-mediated rejection. Finally, this study shows that although complete clonal deletion was not achieved, an important proportion of patients--42%, or 29 of the original 69--could be maintained with prednisone alone or even with no immunosuppression for a total mean follow-up of 13.3 months. Moreover, 16 patients with recent follow-up are surviving with no maintenance immunosuppression or just on prednisone. The mean serum creatinine at last follow-up for these 16 patients is 1.33 +/- 0.2 mg/dL with a mean follow-up of 19.3 months. Clonal deletion can be used to transplant patients without maintenance immunosuppression, adding drugs only as needed.

Donor-specific HLA antibody response in clonal deletion.

1. A total of 61 patients were treated with a clonal deletion protocol and transplanted without planned post-transplant immunosuppression. 2. Twenty-nine (48%) patients did not develop any donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after the transplant, with a median follow-up of 158 days and a mean sCr of 2.1 mg/dL at the last follow-up. 3. Only 23% of the patients who received a DST of 60 mL produced DSA after the transplant, while 68% of the patients who received a bigger DST dose did. 4. Small doses of donor-specific transfusions (60 mL) elicited smaller specific responses, allowing efficient deletion of the reacting clones, creating conditions in which donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies were not produced. 5. A better deleting agent is needed to achieve higher rates of success using the clonal deletion protocol.

Elimination of post-transplant donor-specific HLA antibodies with bortezomib.

We show the ability of bortezomib to remove donor-specific HLA antibody from kidney allograft patients, the drug acting as a proteasome inhibitor, providing targeted therapy against antibody-producing plasma cells. Ten out of thirteen patients (77%) experienced primary DSA reversal, and in the remaining three patients the MFI of their primary DSA was dramatically reduced. Bortezomib is a viable therapy to treat donor-specific HLA antibody in allograft recipients. The potential for long-term benefits--and complications--are still unknown. Prospective trials are being conducted at the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and at IKDRC-ITS, Ahmedabad, India.