Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 63
Filter
1.
Hum Reprod Update ; 19(3): 304-15, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23377865

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Huntington's disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative late onset disorder. This review of reproductive options aims to increase reproductive confidence and to prevent suffering in relation to family planning around HD and possibly other late onset neurodegenerative disorders. METHODS Selected relevant literature and own views and experiences as clinical geneticists, psychologists and ethicists have been used. RESULTS Possible options, with emphasis on prenatal diagnosis (PD) and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to prevent the transmission of HD to the next generation, are described and discussed. They are formally presented in a decision tree, taking into account the presence or absence of a fully penetrant allele (FPA), a reduced penetrant allele (RPA) or an intermediate allele (IA). A table compares invasive and non-invasive PD and PGD. From a psychological perspective, the complex process of counselling and decision-making regarding reproductive options is discussed. Special attention is paid to the decision to avoid the transmission of the mutation and to the confrontation and coping of a mutation-free child growing up with a parent developing disease symptoms. From an ethical point of view, reflections on both PD and PGD are brought forward taking into account the difference between FPA, RPA and IA, direct testing or exclusion testing and taking into account the welfare of the child in the context of medically assisted reproduction. CONCLUSION Recommendations and suggestions for good clinical practice in the reproductive care for HD families are formulated.


Subject(s)
Huntington Disease/diagnosis , Huntington Disease/genetics , Preimplantation Diagnosis/ethics , Prenatal Diagnosis/ethics , Age of Onset , Decision Making , Humans , Huntington Disease/psychology , Mutation , Parents/psychology , Reproduction/genetics
3.
Genet Couns ; 20(4): 293-305, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20162864

ABSTRACT

BRCA1/2 predictive testing and gender: Uptake, motivation and psychological characteristics: Data on male uptake of BRCA1/2 predictive testing and psychological characteristics of males in comparison to females are scarce. We investigated gender differences in the cohort tested at the Center for Human Genetics in Leuven during a 10-year period (1998-2007). Males were significantly older than females. Breast cancer related distress (IES) was significantly lower in men and was not associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2. The groups of both males and females were psychologically stronger than average (SCL-90, UCL) and self-selected. Men were unanimously motivated (personal relevance of 12 motives rated on a Likert scale) by concern for their daughters, and significantly more so than women. One third of them (versus 12% women) referred to child-bearing decisions. Considering all unaffected siblings in the family of origin, uptake of predictive testing was significantly higher in females. Moreover, uptake was significantly higher in women belonging to a BRCA2 than to a BRCA1 family. In the descendants of identified carriers, uptake was predicted by gender and age, but not by the parent's gender or by BRCA1 or BRCA2 status.


Subject(s)
Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Genetic Carrier Screening , Genetic Testing/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Adaptation, Psychological , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Belgium , Breast Neoplasms, Male/genetics , Breast Neoplasms, Male/psychology , Family Health , Female , Genetic Testing/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , Sex Factors
4.
Genet Couns ; 18(4): 367-78, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18286817

ABSTRACT

Because of the burden of serious late onset hereditary diseases, psychological counselling is commonly included in the predictive testing procedure. We discuss the components of psychological counselling in the context of neurodegenerative disorders such as Huntington's disease, some hereditary cancers and some hereditary heart diseases. Psychological counselling should be tailored to the specific characteristics of the disease: penetrance and expression of the mutation, variability of the age at onset and efficacy of prevention and treatment, if available. Finally theories that have already been used for the psychological framing of counselling in the context of predictive testing or to formulate research hypotheses (e.g. Transactional Model of Stress and Coping, Common Sense Model of Self-regulation) are discussed.


Subject(s)
Genetic Diseases, Inborn/epidemiology , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/genetics , Age of Onset , Diagnosis, Differential , Genetic Counseling , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/diagnosis , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Social Support
5.
J Genet Couns ; 14(5): 349-63, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16195942

ABSTRACT

This prospective study evaluates emotional functioning and illness representations in 68 unaffected women (34 carriers/34 noncarriers) 1 year after predictive testing for BRCA1/2 mutations when offered within a multidisciplinary approach. Carriers had higher subjective risk perception of breast cancer than noncarriers. Carriers who did not have prophylactic oophorectomy had the highest risk perception of ovarian cancer. No differences were found between carriers and noncarriers regarding perceived seriousness and perceived control of breast and ovarian cancer. Mean levels of distress were within normal ranges. Only few women showed an overall pattern of clinically elevated distress. Cancer-specific distress and state-anxiety significantly decreased in noncarriers from pre- to posttest while general distress remained about the same. There were no significant changes in distress in the group of carriers except for ovarian cancer distress which significantly decreased from pre- to posttest. Our study did not reveal adverse effects of predictive testing when offered in the context of a multidisciplinary approach.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Depression/etiology , Disclosure , Molecular Biology/methods , Ovarian Neoplasms , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Body Image , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , Female , Genes, BRCA1 , Genetic Counseling/methods , Humans , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology , Point Mutation/genetics , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies
6.
Clin Genet ; 65(1): 24-31, 2004 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15032971

ABSTRACT

This study focuses on the partner relationship of tested persons, 5 years after their predictive test result for Huntington's disease (HD). We describe changes in marital status, quality of the relationship, and perceived changes in the relationship. Twenty-six carriers, 14 of their partners, 33 non-carriers, and 17 of their partners participated in the study. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used. For the majority of tested persons (about 70%), the marital status was unchanged 5 years post test. Overall, carriers rated the quality of the relationship higher than their partners did and they perceived more positive changes. Qualitative data show that a test result leading to changed roles may induce significant marital distress. Another consequence of the test may be the changes in dynamics in asymptomatic carrier couples. A pre-test discussion of the possible impact of the test result on the relationship should result in a better preparation for and more understanding of the reactions after testing. Counselling after testing should stimulate an open communication between partners with consideration of needs and anxieties of both partners.


Subject(s)
Genetic Counseling , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing/psychology , Huntington Disease/diagnosis , Huntington Disease/genetics , Interpersonal Relations , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Huntington Disease/psychology , Male , Marriage , Pedigree , Prognosis , Stress, Psychological
7.
Community Genet ; 6(4): 192-205, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15331865

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a survey in seven European cancer genetics centres to compare service provision, organisation and practices for familial breast and colon cancer consultations and testing. Information was obtained on aspects of services both nationally and locally. METHODS: A detailed survey questionnaire was adapted collaboratively to obtain the required information. Initial survey data were collected within each centre and interim results were discussed at two European Workshops. Where differences in practice existed, details were clarified to ensure accuracy and adequacy of information. Participating centres were Haifa (Israel), Hannover (Germany), Leiden (The Netherlands), Leuven (Belgium), Manchester (UK), Marseille (France) and Milan (Italy), representing countries with populations ranging from 6.5 to 80 million. RESULTS: The European countries diverged in regard to the number of cancer genetics centres nationally (from 8 in Belgium to 37 in France), and the average population served by each centre (from 0.59 million in Israel to 3.32 million in Italy). All centres offered free care at the point of access, but referral to specialist care varied according to national health care provision. At a centre level, staff roles varied due to differences in training and health care provision. The annual number of counsellees seen in each participating centre ranged from 200 to over 1,700. Access to breast surveillance or bowel screening varied between countries, again reflecting differences in medical care pathways. These countries converged in regard to the wide availability of professional bodies and published guidelines promoting aspects of service provision. Similarities between centres included provision of a multidisciplinary team, with access to psychological support, albeit with varying degrees of integration. All services were dominated (70-90%) by referrals from families with an increased risk of breast cancer despite wide variation in referral patterns. Collection of pedigree data and risk assessment strategies were broadly similar, and centres used comparable genetic testing protocols. Average consultation times ranged between 45 and 90 min. All centres had access to a laboratory offering DNA testing for breast and bowel cancer-predisposing genes, although testing rates varied, reflecting the stage of service development and the type of population. Israel offered the highest number of genetic tests for breast cancer susceptibility because of the existence of specific founder mutations, in part explaining why the cancer genetics service in Haifa differed most from the other six. CONCLUSION: Despite considerable differences in service organisation, there were broad similarities in the provision of cancer genetic services in the centres surveyed.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Data Collection , Europe , Genetic Counseling/organization & administration , Genetic Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Genetic Testing/organization & administration , Health Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Health Facility Administration , Humans , Israel , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation
8.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 106(3): 131-41, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12174172

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) whether the battery of neuropsychological tests was sufficiently sensitive to find differences between symptomatic patients with Huntington's disease (HD) and clinically asymptomatic individuals carrying the HD gene (AGC) and individuals without the HD gene (NGC) and (2) whether increasing cognitive impairment is found in AGC as compared with NGC. METHODS: A case-control, single-blind study comparing subjects with clinically manifest HD (n=21), AGC (n=12) or NGC (n=11) and a 1-year follow-up of AGC and NGC. Genotype for the HD gene was determined by molecular testing. A large battery of neuropsychological tests measuring several cognitive domains was performed. RESULTS: On most neuropsychological tasks, HD patients perform significantly worse than AGC and NGC. At baseline and follow-up examination, compared with NGC, AGC had lower scores on the symbol digit modalities test. Scores on a block span task declined more rapidly among AGC than among NGC. CONCLUSION: Cognitive impairments in HD patients are found when compared with clinically asymptomatic individuals carrying the HD mutation. Furthermore, our results suggest that subtle cognitive deficits are present in asymptomatic persons who have inherited the HD gene.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/etiology , Huntington Disease/complications , Huntington Disease/genetics , Neuropsychological Tests , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genotype , Heterozygote , Humans , Huntington Disease/physiopathology , Huntington Disease/psychology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Time Factors
9.
Community Genet ; 5(2): 128-37, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12739519

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) concerning predictive testing for late-onset diseases, as well as the perception of their own role in this context. METHODS: 356 GPs received mail questionnaires with telephone pre-notifications and reminders. RESULTS: The questionnaire was returned by 60% (n=215). The GPs' attitudes toward predictive testing for breast cancer, thyroid cancer, Alzheimer disease and Huntington's disease were influenced by the availability and the type of preventive and therapeutic options, the age of onset of the disease as well as by ethical concerns. Regarding a possible tasks for GPs, most of the GPs focussed on gate-keeping aspects, such as providing information and making referrals. CONCLUSION: The GPs were supportive of a limited role for general practice in predictive testing. Genetic education for GPs is needed, with attention to non-directiveness and the characteristic psychosocial and ethical implications of this particular type of genetic testing.


Subject(s)
Age of Onset , Attitude of Health Personnel , Genetic Testing/psychology , Physician's Role , Physicians, Family/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Alzheimer Disease/genetics , Belgium , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Child , Education, Medical, Continuing , Female , Genetic Counseling/psychology , Humans , Huntington Disease/genetics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Thyroid Neoplasms/genetics
11.
Community Genet ; 4(1): 43-49, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11493752

ABSTRACT

Objectives: It was the main aim of the present retrospective study carried out in Flanders to evaluate how women with a false-positive triple test result look back on their experience and decision making and how many of them make use of the triple test in subsequent pregnancies. Methods: All 508 women tested in the Centre for Human Genetics in Leuven in 1995 who had a positive triple test result followed by a normal amniocentesis outcome were invited to participate in a mailed questionnaire study with open and multiple choice questions in 1998. The response rate was 68%. Results: The answers to the multiple choice question assessing how they look back on their initial expectations regarding the exact meaning of the triple test revealed that less than one half reported that it concerned the identification of 'a higher risk of carrying a child with Down syndrome (DS)'. Reporting correct initial expectations was significantly associated with a higher education level. The same holds for indecisiveness regarding pregnancy termination should the amniocentesis have detected a fetus with DS. As expected, a large majority of the women reported a high level of distress or worry after the communication of the positive triple test result. Overall the findings show that retrospectively most women had the feeling that the decision to have amniocentesis was their own decision rather than a professional's. Of the subgroup with one or more subsequent pregnancies 70% had another triple test. Conclusions: The overall results of this study clearly reveal a need for a systematic approach aimed at better informing and counselling pregnant women about the implications and limitations of the triple test. Notwithstanding the reported high level of distress caused by a positive triple test result, a large majority of the women with subsequent pregnancies had another triple test; they represent a clearly higher percentage than in another recent study. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

13.
Patient Educ Couns ; 43(2): 179-87, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11369151

ABSTRACT

Within a group of 300 medical students, two characteristics of risk communication in the context of a decision regarding prenatal diagnosis for cystic fibrosis are manipulated: verbal versus numerical probabilities and the negative versus positive framing of the problem (having a child with versus without cystic fibrosis). Independently of the manipulations, most students were in favor of prenatal diagnosis. The effect of framing was only significant in the conditions with verbal information: negative framing produced a stronger choice in favor of prenatal diagnosis than positive framing. The framing effect in the verbal conditions and its absence in the numerical conditions are explained by the dominance of the problem-occurrence orientation in health matters as well as a recoding process which is more likely to occur in the numerical (the probability "1-P" switches to its counterpart "P") than in the verbal conditions. The implications for the practice of genetic counseling are discussed.


Subject(s)
Communication , Cystic Fibrosis/diagnosis , Cystic Fibrosis/genetics , Genetic Counseling , Prenatal Diagnosis , Adult , Belgium , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Male , Netherlands , Pregnancy , Probability , Risk
14.
Soc Sci Med ; 51(6): 831-41, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10972428

ABSTRACT

Increasing knowledge about the human genome has resulted in the availability of a steadily increasing number of predictive DNA-tests for two major categories of diseases: neurogenetic diseases and hereditary cancers. The psychological complexity of predictive testing for these late onset diseases requires careful consideration. It is the main aim of the present paper to describe this psychological complexity, which necessitates an adequate and systematic multidisciplinary approach, including psychological counselling, as well as ongoing education of professionals and of the general public. Predictive testing for neurogenetic diseases--in an adequate counselling context--so far elicits optimism regarding the short- and mid-term impact of the predictive test result. The psychosocial impact has been most widely studied for Huntington's disease. Longitudinal studies are of the utmost importance in evaluating the long-term impact of predictive testing for neurogenetic diseases on the tested person and his/her family. Given the more recent experience with predictive DNA-testing for hereditary cancers, fewer published scientific data are available. Longitudinal research on the mid- and long-term psychological impact of the predictive test result is essential. Decision making regarding health surveillance or preventive surgery after being detected as a carrier of one of the relevant mutations should receive special attention. Tailoring the professional approach--inside and outside genetic centres--to the families' needs is a continuous challenge. Even if a continuous effort is made, several important questions remain unanswered, last but not least the question regarding the best strategy to guarantee that the availability of predictive genetic testing results in a reduction of suffering caused by genetic disease and in an improvement of the quality of life of families confronted with genetic disease.


Subject(s)
Counseling , Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System/genetics , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/genetics , Patient Care Team , Patient Education as Topic , Genetic Counseling , Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System/psychology , Humans , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/psychology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Quality of Life
15.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 8(2): 130-6, 2000 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10757645

ABSTRACT

Since the identification of two breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1/2), predictive testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) has been available. Given the complexity and uncertainties of HBOC and the potential impact of predictive testing on psychological well-being, we offer the test applicants a combination of information-oriented and psychological counselling. In this paper, we describe the multidisciplinary approach for predictive testing for HBOC as a clinical service in Leuven, hereby focusing on psychological and decision counselling practice. Attention is paid to the theoretical framework used for pre-test psychological counselling in Leuven. We discuss three important interacting dimensions of psychological counselling: individual emotional support, decision counselling and support of the family communication process. Decision counselling consists of an evaluation of the cognitive and the emotional processing of the information given and strategies and resources for coping. This serves as a starting point to facilitate free informed decision making. Scenario development is used as a decision aid.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Genetic Testing/psychology , Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control , Belgium , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genetic Counseling/methods , Genetic Counseling/psychology , Humans , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/psychology
16.
Psychooncology ; 9(6): 528-36, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11180588

ABSTRACT

Individuals at high risk for developing breast and/or ovarian cancer are faced with difficult decisions regarding genetic testing, cancer prevention and/or intensive surveillance. Large interindividual differences exist in the uptake of these health-related services. This paper is aimed at understanding and predicting how people emotionally and behaviourally react to information concerning genetic predisposition to breast/ovarian cancer. For this purpose, the self-regulation model of illness representations is elaborated. This model suggests that health-related behaviour is influenced by a person's cognitive and emotional representation of the health threat. These representations generate coping behaviour aimed at resolving the objective health problems (problem-focussed coping) and at reducing the emotional distress induced by the health threat (emotion-focussed coping). Based on theoretical considerations and empirical studies, four interrelated attributes of the cognitive illness representation of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer are described: causal beliefs concerning the disease, perceived severity, perceived susceptibility to the disease and perceived controllability. The paper also addresses the complex interactions between these cognitive attributes, emotional distress and preventive health behaviour.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Cognition , Emotions , Health Behavior , Models, Psychological , Stress, Psychological , Adult , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Internal-External Control , Patient Compliance , Preventive Medicine
18.
J Med Genet ; 36(12): 897-905, 1999 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10593997

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Psychometric testing of participants in predictive DNA testing for Huntington's disease (HD) has shown that 15% of the subjects at risk for HD had at least mild depression or a high score for general anxiety or both in the pre-test period. The main aim of the study was the delineation of variables associated with pre-test distress of applicants for predictive testing for HD. Based on theoretical considerations, four specific hypotheses were tested regarding the role of (1) the test participant's age at the (perceived) parental onset of HD, (2) the affected parent's sex, (3) the perception of the risk for HD, and (4) the subjective proximity of the disease. Secondly, these four variables were used in multiple regression analyses to select the best predictors of pre- and post-test psychological functioning (one year after the test). Increasing the understanding of pre- and post-test distress is important for developing better counselling and support strategies for test applicants. METHODS: Data were collected by means of clinical interviews and psychometric questionnaires during the pre- and post-test (one year after the test) counselling sessions for predictive testing for HD. RESULTS: We found significant associations of the participant's age at the parental onset, the subjective proximity of the disease onset, and the perceived risk with pre-test psychometric measures of psychological functioning. Multiple regression analyses showed that the best predictors of pre-test functioning were the perceived proximity of the disease onset and its interaction with risk perception. Regarding post-test functioning, none of the proposed variables had a unique contribution beyond that accounted for by pre-test psychological functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Test participants who are close to the perceived age of onset of HD and who have a pessimistic risk perception should be given special attention during pre-test counselling because of their possible negative affective condition at that time. Pre-test psychological measures were the best predictors of post-test distress, irrespective of the test result. Suggestions for future longitudinal research are formulated. This kind of research should enable clinical geneticists and mental health professionals to refine the pre- and post-test counselling strategies for predictive DNA testing, not only for HD, but also for other incurable late onset disorders.


Subject(s)
Depression/etiology , Huntington Disease/psychology , Adult , Age of Onset , Female , Humans , Huntington Disease/diagnosis , Huntington Disease/genetics , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Factors
20.
Patient Educ Couns ; 35(1): 15-26, 1998 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9832893

ABSTRACT

About a decade ago the introduction of predictive testing for Huntington's disease (HD) was an important milestone in medical history. The aim of the present paper concerning predictive DNA-testing for HD is fourfold. First of all it describes the professional challenge of elaborating an adequate test protocol and of permanently using a multidisciplinary approach to deal with predictive test requests. Secondly the paper is aimed at unraveling the factors that play a part in uptake and decision making regarding predictive testing. Hereby the Health Belief Model is used as a framework for understanding differences between tested and untested persons. Thirdly the impact of the test result on psychological well-being is reviewed. Finally this paper assesses the utilisation of prenatal diagnosis after predictive testing for HD and reflects on the psychological and ethical implications of different types of prenatal tests, including preimplantation genetic diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Genetic Testing/methods , Huntington Disease/diagnosis , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Adult , Decision Making , Ethics, Medical , Female , Genetic Testing/psychology , Humans , Huntington Disease/genetics , Huntington Disease/psychology , Pedigree , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis/psychology , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...