Towards personalized treatment: predictors of short-term HAQ response in recent-onset active rheumatoid arthritis are different from predictors of rapid radiological progression.

OBJECTIVE: Personalized treatment depends on the treatment goals. Current prediction models to guide initial treatment choices focus on radiological damage progression. However, for some patients this outcome is less relevant, whereas short-term functional ability is relevant to all. Do these various treatment goals share the same predictors? METHODS: Data for 497 patients from the Dutch Behandel Strategieen (BeSt) study of treatment strategies for early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), randomized to initial monotherapy or combination therapy, were used. Predictors of short-term functional disability [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score ≥ 1 after 3 months of treatment] were identified with logistic regression analyses. Predicted risks of a HAQ score ≥ 1 were determined for each treatment group and for each subpopulation. RESULTS: At baseline, 76% of patients had a HAQ score ≥ 1 (mean 1.7 ± 0.5). After 3 months of treatment this score was achieved by 40% (mean HAQ score 1.5 ± 0.5). Baseline HAQ score, pain, the Ritchie Articular Index (RAI), and treatment group were significant independent predictors for a HAQ score ≥ 1; the presence of rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies, and baseline radiological damage were not. With cut-offs of 35% and 60%, the risk of a HAQ score ≥ 1 was high for 47% and low for 20% of the patients treated with initial monotherapy. Risks were markedly reduced in the combination therapy groups, also in unfavourable risk profiles. CONCLUSION: In recent-onset active RA, baseline HAQ score, pain, and initial treatment are predictors for a HAQ score ≥ 1 after 3 months. Known predictors of radiological damage were not predictive of short-term functional disability. The choice of the best initial treatment thus depends on the relevance of various outcome measures for an individual patient.

Patient-reported outcomes in a randomized trial comparing four different treatment strategies in recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of 4 different treatment strategies for recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on 2-year patient-reported outcomes, including functioning and quality of life. METHODS: A total of 508 patients with recent-onset RA were randomly assigned to 1) sequential monotherapy, 2) step-up combination therapy, both starting with methotrexate, 3) initial combination therapy, including a tapered high-dose prednisone, or 4) initial combination therapy with methotrexate and infliximab. Treatment was adjusted every 3 months if the Disease Activity Score (DAS) remained >2.4. The McMaster Toronto Arthritis Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire, the Short Form 36 (SF-36), and scores for pain, global health, and disease activity measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) were compared between groups at baseline and every 3 months thereafter for 2 years. RESULTS: After 2 years, all patient-reported outcomes had improved significantly from baseline, irrespective of the treatment strategy. SF-36 subscale scores approached population norms for 3 physical components, and achieved population norms (P > 0.05) for bodily pain and 4 mental components. Improvement in functioning, VAS scores, and physical items of the SF-36 occurred significantly earlier in patients treated with initial combination therapies (all comparisons after 3 months: overall P < 0.001; P < 0.05 for groups 1 and 2 versus groups 3 and 4). CONCLUSION: All 4 DAS-driven treatment strategies resulted in substantial improvements in functional ability, quality of life, and self-assessed VAS scores after 2 years. Initial combination therapy led to significantly faster improvement in all patient-reported measures.

Progression of joint damage in early rheumatoid arthritis: association with HLA-DRB1, rheumatoid factor, and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in relation to different treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of HLA-DRB1, rheumatoid factor (RF), and anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) status with progression of joint damage in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated according to different treatment strategies. METHODS: The present study was conducted using data from the BeSt study (Behandelstrategieën voor Reumatoide Artritis [treatment strategies for rheumatoid arthritis]), a randomized trial comparing 4 targeted (toward achievement of a Disease Activity Score [DAS] of < or =2.4) treatment strategies: sequential monotherapy (group 1), step-up combination therapy (group 2), initial combination therapy with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and prednisone (group 3), and initial combination therapy with methotrexate and infliximab (group 4), in 508 patients with early RA. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict progressive disease (increase of Sharp/van der Heijde score over 2 years beyond the smallest detectable change [4.6]) according to the presence or absence of the shared epitope (SE), DERAA, RF, and ACPA, with correction for other baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Progressive disease could not be predicted by presence of the SE: the odds ratio in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, was 1.4, 2.6, 1.9, and 3.0. DERAA carriership did not protect against progressive disease (odds ratio 0.4, 1.4, 0.9, and 0.9 in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). RF positivity and ACPA positivity predicted progressive disease in group 1 (odds ratio 4.7 [95% confidence interval 1.5-14.5] for RF and 12.6 [95% confidence interval 3.0-51.9] for ACPA), but not in groups 2-4 (for RF, odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.5 [0.5-4.9], 1.0 [0.3-3.3], and 1.4 [0.4-4.8] in group 2, group 3, and group 4, respectively; for ACPA, odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 3.4 [0.8-14.2], 1.7 [0.5-5.4], and 1.8 [0.5-6.8] in group 2, group 3, and group 4). CONCLUSION: In patients with early RA treated with the goal of tight control of the DAS, no significant association between HLA-DRB1 status and radiographic progression was found. RF and ACPA were predictive of progressive disease only in patients treated with sequential monotherapy. These observations suggest that effective treatment can prevent radiographic progression, even in patients with risk factors for severe damage.

[Brucellosis as an imported disease in a young man with arthritis]. / Brucellose als importziekte bij een jonge man met artritis.

A 23-year-old man was admitted to hospital with an extremely painful sacroiliitis on the left side. He had been back in The Netherlands for 5 weeks after a one-year stay on a farm in India where he consumed unpasteurised cow's milk almost daily. Three months before admission he had been ill for several weeks with high fever, a painful right hip joint and night sweats. He was diagnosed in India as having coxitis, thought to be due to a Giardia infection. After hospitalisation in The Netherlands, he developed daily high fever with chills and Brucella sacroiliitis was diagnosed via a positive serology, later confirmed by a positive blood culture for Brucella melitensis. The patient was treated with doxycycline and rifampicin but due to persistent fever, gentamicin was later added for 7 days. As a result of nausea related to rifampicin, this was changed to ciprofloxacin. During treatment he also developed a severely painful right coxitis, possibly due to local release of bacterial endotoxins from a previous Brucella infection in India. After three months of antibiotic treatment, he recovered fully. Although brucellosis is a rare imported disease in The Netherlands, the possibility must be kept in mind in cases of arthritis following a stay in the (sub)tropics.