Administration of yellow fever vaccine in patients with egg allergy.

BACKGROUND: The population of large parts of Africa, South America and travellers to these areas are at risk of yellow fever (YF) with a 50% mortality risk. Yellow fever vaccine (YFV) propagated in hens' eggs confers protection in 95% of the vaccinated. The rate of anaphylaxis for YFV ranges from 0.42 to 1.8/100,000 doses with most cases considered to be due to egg allergy. Egg allergy is a contraindication for the YFV. Nevertheless, the potential fatal sequelae from YF give the incentive to protect everyone at risk irrespective of their allergic status. METHODS: Six subjects who had had a recent reaction to egg and who were travelling to endemic areas (3 adults and 3 children) underwent skin prick tests (SPT) with undiluted YFV and egg extract. Intradermal tests for YFV were undertaken at a 1:10 dilution. In 4 egg-allergic patients with a positive SPT to YFV, a 7-step desensitization protocol was used. A 2-step (10 + 90%) protocol was used in the 2 subjects with a negative YFV SPT. Premedication was not administered. RESULTS: All 6 patients were successfully vaccinated. Four patients completed desensitization: 1 developed mild local erythema at the injection site, 1 had fleeting generalized urticaria with local erythema/angioedema and 2 did not experience any adverse reactions. Patients who received YFV in 2 steps developed no adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the successful administration of YFV in 6 egg-allergic patients. The Cambridge Allergy 7-step protocol allows for its safe administration in patients with positive SPT to YFV. A 2-step protocol can be used in patients with negative YFV SPT.

Paracetamol hypersensitivity: clinical features, mechanism and role of specific IgE.

BACKGROUND: Paracetamol is a common antipyretic/analgesic and a component of many prescription and over- the- counter preparations. Hypersensitivity reactions to paracetamol appear to be increasing, but there are few prevalence data. The mechanism is poorly understood. We identified the clinical features of 32 patients with suspected paracetamol allergy, investigated the underlying mechanism and examined co-existing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) tolerance. METHODS: A clinical history was taken and skin tests and an oral challenge were performed in 32 patients with suspected paracetamol allergy. RESULTS: Patients presented with a combination of urticaria, angio-oedema (face, hands), erythema (cutaneous features in 94%), dyspnoea (including laryngeal oedema), rhinoconjunctivitis, cough, abdominal pain and anaphylaxis. Two patients had a positive skin prick test (SPT) and unequivocal history of acute urticaria/facial angio-oedema/conjunctivitis/cough after paracetamol with no other triggers. One patient had a positive intradermal test. Oral challenge was positive in 15 of 31 patients (including self-challenge in 4), triggering (a combination of) rhinitis, conjunctivitis, pruritus, erythema, urticaria, angio-oedema, dyspnoea and abdominal pain. Sensitivity was evident in 1 patient on the basis of the patient's history. Overall, paracetamol hypersensitivity was confirmed in 16 of the 32 patients (50%). Twelve of the 16 paracetamol-allergic patients (75%) tolerated NSAIDs (negative challenge in 6, negative history in 6). Four of these 16 patients (25%) were intolerant of NSAIDs (positive challenge in 1, self-challenge in 3). CONCLUSIONS: In past reports on paracetamol hypersensitivity, only single cases of a positive SPT and detectable specific IgE have been described. Our data confirm that specific IgE may be a mechanism underlying paracetamol hypersensitivity, as in this series 18.8% of the patients had specific IgE. In 81.2% of patients, negative skin tests did not exclude paracetamol hypersensitivity, suggesting that it may be mediated by leukotrienes. However, three quarters of our patients tolerated NSAIDs, implicating an alternative mechanism. In patients with suspected paracetamol allergy, skin tests should be performed in addition to clinical history and oral challenge.

Diagnosis and management of hymenoptera venom allergy: British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) guidelines.

This guidance for the management of patients with hymenoptera venom allergy has been prepared by the Standards of Care Committee (SOCC) of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI). The guideline is based on evidence as well as on expert opinion and is for use by both adult physicians and pediatricians practising allergy. During the development of these guidelines, all BSACI members were included in the consultation process using a web-based system. Their comments and suggestions were carefully considered by the SOCC. Where evidence was lacking, consensus was reached by the experts on the committee. Included in this guideline are epidemiology, risk factors, clinical features, diagnostic tests, natural history of hymenoptera venom allergy and guidance on undertaking venom immunotherapy (VIT). There are also separate sections on children, elevated baseline tryptase and mastocytosis and mechanisms underlying VIT. Finally, we have made recommendations for potential areas of future research.

British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines for the management of egg allergy.

This guideline advises on the management of patients with egg allergy. Most commonly, egg allergy presents in infancy, with a prevalence of approximately 2% in children and 0.1% in adults. A clear clinical history and the detection of egg white-specific IgE (by skin prick test or serum assay) will confirm the diagnosis in most cases. Egg avoidance advice is the cornerstone of management. Egg allergy often resolves and re-introduction can be achieved at home if reactions have been mild and there is no asthma. Patients with a history of severe reactions or asthma should have reintroduction guided by a specialist. All children with egg allergy should receive measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination. Influenza and yellow fever vaccines should only be considered in egg-allergic patients under the guidance of an allergy specialist. This guideline was prepared by the Standards of Care Committee (SOCC) of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) and is intended for allergists and others with a special interest in allergy. The recommendations are evidence-based but where evidence was lacking consensus was reached by the panel of specialists on the committee. The document encompasses epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and co-morbid associations.

BSACI guidelines for the investigation of suspected anaphylaxis during general anaesthesia.

Investigation of anaphylaxis during general anaesthesia requires an accurate record of events including information on timing of drug administration provided by the anaesthetist, as well as timed acute tryptase measurements. Referrals should be made to a centre with the experience and ability to investigate reactions to a range of drug classes/substances including neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) intravenous (i.v.) anaesthetics, antibiotics, opioid analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), local anaesthetics, colloids, latex and other agents. About a third of cases are due to allergy to NMBAs. Therefore, investigation should be carried out in a dedicated drug allergy clinic to allow seamless investigation of all suspected drug classes as a single day-case. This will often require skin prick tests, intra-dermal testing and/or drug challenge. Investigation must cover the agents administered, but should also include most other commonly used NMBAs and i.v. anaesthetics. The outcome should be to identify the cause and a range of drugs/agents likely to be safe for future use. The allergist is responsible for a detailed report to the referring anaesthetist and to the patient's GP as well as the surgeon/obstetrician. A shorter report should be provided to the patient, adding an allergy alert to the case notes and providing an application form for an alert-bracelet indicating the wording to be inscribed. The MHRA should be notified. Investigation of anaphylaxis during general anaesthesia should be focussed in major allergy centres with a high throughput of cases and with experience and ability as described above. We suggest this focus since there is a distinct lack of validated data for testing, thus requiring experience in interpreting tests and because of the serious consequences of diagnostic error.

Anaphylaxis to patent blue V: a case series and proposed diagnostic protocol.

Patent blue V is widely used in the identification of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer and other malignancies. Individual case reports of allergy to patent blue V have been described in the medical literature since the 1960s. However, there is little data on clinical features and little experience of which allergy tests are appropriate or useful. We gathered all cases of patent blue V allergy that had been seen and diagnosed in the Department of Allergy, Addenbrooke's Hospital over a 3-year period. We collected clinical details of each case including skin test results. For comparison we recruited 12 healthy control subjects who then underwent skin testing to patent blue V. Six cases of patent blue V allergy were identified, all occurring during sentinel lymph node identification for breast carcinoma. All 6 had positive skin prick tests to neat patent blue V (25 mg/ml). Skin prick testing with a 1 : 10 dilution (2.5 mg/ml) produced positive results in 3 of 4 patients tested, and intradermal testing at a 1 : 100 dilution was (0.25 mg/ml) was positive in all patients tested. Of 12 control subjects, 11 had negative skin prick tests to both neat and 1 : 10 patent blue V with one subject showing a positive reaction to the higher concentration only. On the basis of our experience of patent blue V allergy, we propose a diagnostic protocol that can be safely and reliably utilised in centres equipped for allergy testing.

Successful oral tolerance induction in severe peanut allergy.

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is common, potentially severe and rarely resolves causing impaired quality of life. No disease-modifying treatment exists and there is therefore a need to develop a therapeutic intervention. AIMS OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to investigate whether peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) can induce clinical tolerance to peanut protein. METHODS: Four peanut-allergic children underwent OIT. Preintervention oral challenges were performed to confirm clinical allergy and define the amount of protein required to cause a reaction (dose thresholds). OIT was then administered as daily doses of peanut flour increasing from 5 to 800 mg of protein with 2-weekly dose increases. After 6 further weeks of treatment, the oral challenge was repeated to define change in dose threshold and subjects continued daily treatment. RESULTS: Preintervention challenges confirmed peanut allergy and revealed dose thresholds of 5-50 mg (1/40-1/4 of a whole peanut); one subject had anaphylaxis during challenge and required adrenaline injection. All subjects tolerated immunotherapy updosing to 800 mg protein and i.m. adrenaline was not required. Each subject tolerated at least 10 whole peanuts (approximately 2.38 g protein) in postintervention challenges, an increase in dose threshold of at least 48-, 49-, 55- and 478-fold for the four subjects. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a substantial increase in dose threshold after OIT in all subjects, including the subject with proven anaphylaxis. OIT was well tolerated and conferred protection against at least 10 peanuts, more than is likely to be encountered during accidental ingestion.

BSACI guidelines for the management of drug allergy.

These guidelines have been prepared by the Standards of Care Committee (SOCC) of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) and are intended for allergists and others with a special interest in allergy. As routine or validated tests are not available for the majority of drugs, considerable experience is required for the investigation of allergic drug reactions and to undertake specific drug challenge. A missed or incorrect diagnosis of drug allergy can have serious consequences. Therefore, investigation and management of drug allergy is best carried out in specialist centres with large patient numbers and adequate competence and resources to manage complex cases. The recommendations are evidence-based but where evidence was lacking consensus was reached by the panel of specialists on the committee. The document encompasses epidemiology, risk factors, clinical patterns of drug allergy, diagnosis and treatment procedures. In order to achieve a correct diagnosis we have placed particular emphasis on obtaining an accurate clinical history and on the physical examination, as these are critical to the choice of skin tests and subsequent drug provocation. After the diagnosis of drug allergy has been established, communication of results and patient education are vital components of overall patient management.

Patterns of immunoglobulin G responses to egg and peanut allergens are distinct: ovalbumin-specific immunoglobulin responses are ubiquitous, but peanut-specific immunoglobulin responses are up-regulated in peanut allergy.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of food-specific IgG subclasses in food allergy and tolerance remains unclear. Specific IgG titres are often reported in non-standardized units, which do not allow comparisons between studies or allergens. OBJECTIVE: To quantify, in absolute units, ovalbumin (OVA)- and peanut-specific IgG levels in children with peanut or egg allergy (active or resolved) and in non-allergic controls. Methods Children aged 1-15 years were recruited. Peanut allergy was diagnosed by convincing history and a 95% predictive level of specific IgE; egg allergy or resolution was confirmed by oral challenge. Serum IgG, IgG1 and IgG4 levels (microg/mL) to OVA and peanut extract were quantified by ELISA. RESULTS: OVA- and peanut-specific IgG was detected in all subjects. In non-allergic controls (n=18), OVA-specific IgG levels were significantly higher than peanut-specific IgG (median microg/mL IgG=15.9 vs. 2.2, IgG1=1.3 vs. 0.6, IgG4=7.9 vs. 0.7; P<0.01). There were no differences in OVA-specific IgG, IgG1 and IgG4 between egg-allergic (n=40), egg-resolved (n=22) and control (n=18) subjects. In contrast, peanut-specific IgG (median microg/mL IgG=17.0, IgG1=3.3, IgG4=5.2) were significantly higher in peanut-allergic subjects (n=59) compared with controls and with non-peanut-sensitized but egg-allergic subjects (n=26). Overall, the range of IgG4 was greater than IgG1, and IgG4 was the dominant subclass in >60% of all subjects. CONCLUSION: OVA-specific IgG levels of egg-allergic, egg-resolved or control groups are not distinguishable. Higher peanut-specific IgG levels are associated with clinical allergy, but the range of IgG titres of the allergic and control groups overlapped. Hence, OVA and peanut-specific IgG measurements do not appear to be of diagnostic value. Strong IgG responses to OVA may be a normal physiological response to a protein frequently ingested from infancy, whereas up-regulated IgG responses in peanut allergy may be indicative of a dysregulated immune response to peanut allergens.

T cell proliferation and cytokine responses to ovalbumin and ovomucoid detected in children with and without egg allergy.

BACKGROUND: The specific T cell responses in egg allergy and resolution have not been fully elucidated. OBJECTIVE: To characterize egg allergen-specific T cells of children with active and resolved egg allergy, in comparison with non-allergic controls. METHOD: We studied children with active (n=35) or resolved (n=20) egg allergy determined by oral challenge, and non-allergic controls (n=15). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were labelled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) and stimulated with ovalbumin (OVA), ovomucoid (OM) or tetanus toxoid. Flow cytometry was used to detect divided CD3+ CFSE(lo) cells that expressed intra-cytoplasmic IL-4 or IFN-gamma. The cell division index (CDI) was calculated as a measure of allergen-specific proliferation. Peanut-specific T cells of a subgroup of children who also had peanut allergy were also studied. RESULTS: OVA-specific T cells were found in subjects with active (87%) or resolved (75%) egg allergy and in controls (67%), with a trend towards increased T cell proliferation in allergy. OM-induced weaker T cell responses than OVA, stimulating fewer responders (46% allergic, 50% resolved, 60% controls) and 10-fold less proliferation [CDI(OVA) 2.0 (median), 25.6 (maximum) vs. CDI(OM) 0.2 (median), 15.1 (maximum); P<0.01]. Both egg allergens induced significant IL-4+ (median 10%, range 1.4-58%) and IFN-gamma+ (median 28%, range 4.5-63%) cells in responders, including non-allergics. There were no significant differences in IFN-gamma+ or IL-4+ cells or in IFN-gamma/IL-4 ratios between groups. Peanut-specific T cell proliferation was significantly higher in peanut allergy [CDI(CPE) 16.5 (median), 24.8 (maximum)] compared with controls [CDI(CPE) 2.1 (median), 16.1 (maximum)] but cytokine profiles were not different. Tetanus-specific T cells were seen in 90% of the subjects, with no significant inter-group differences in responses. CONCLUSION: Egg allergen-specific T cells are readily detected in all groups and not restricted to egg allergy. In contrast, peanut-specific proliferation was significantly higher in peanut allergy. This suggests that T cell responses in peanut and egg allergy may differ. We did not find T helper type 2-deviated cytokine responses in egg or peanut allergy.

Cashew nut causes more severe reactions than peanut: case-matched comparison in 141 children.

BACKGROUND: Cashew nut allergy is becoming common, but the risk of severe reactions in comparison with peanut allergy is unknown. METHOD: A case-matching study of children with a recent history of a reaction after definite nut ingestion, with positive skin prick test. Children whose worst ever reaction was to cashew nut (cashew group), were matched with two children each whose worst ever reaction was to peanut (peanut group) for sex, age of reaction and presentation, amount ingested, and asthma. Severity of the worst clinical reactions to date was compared. RESULTS: A total of 47 children in the cashew group were matched to 94 in the peanut group. There were no differences in clinical features between groups for matching criteria, except asthma (more prevalent in the peanut group). Wheezing and cardiovascular symptoms were reported more frequently during reactions in the cashew compared with the peanut group: odds ratios (OR) 8.4 (95% CI: 3.2-22.0) and 13.6 (95% CI: 5.6-32.8), respectively. The cashew group received intramuscular adrenaline more frequently: OR 13.3 (95% CI: 5.5-32.2). Overall, the OR for a severe reaction (severe dyspnoea and/or collapse) in the cashew group was 25.1 (95% CI: 3.1-203.5). CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies show cashew nut can cause severe reactions; this is the first study to show by case-matching that severe clinical reactions occur more frequently in cashew compared with peanut allergy. The nut type which caused the worst reaction to date should be considered when providing emergency medication.

Facial thermography is a sensitive and specific method for assessing food challenge outcome.

BACKGROUND: Oral challenge is widely used for diagnosing food allergy but variable interpretation of subjective symptoms may cause error. Facial thermography was evaluated as a novel, objective and sensitive indicator of challenge outcome. METHODS: A total of 24 children with a history of egg allergy underwent oral challenge, which were scored positive when objective symptoms occurred or negative after all doses were consumed without reaction. Facial temperatures were recorded at baseline and 10-min intervals. The difference between mean and baseline temperature (DeltaT), maximum DeltaT during challenge (DeltaT(max)) and area under curve of DeltaT against time (DeltaTAUC) were calculated for predefined nasal, oral and forehead areas, and related to objective challenge outcome. RESULTS: There were 13 positive and 11 negative challenges. Median nasal DeltaTAUC and DeltaT(max) were greater in positive compared with negative challenges (231- and 5-fold, respectively; P < 0.05). In positive challenges, nasal temperatures showed an early transient rise at 20 min, preceding objective symptoms at median 67 min. There was a sustained temperature increase from 60 min, which was reduced by antihistamines. A cut-off for nasal DeltaT(max) of 0.8 degrees C occurring within 20 min of the start of the challenge predicted outcome with 91% sensitivity (positive predictive value [PPV] 100%) and 100% specificity (negative predictive value [NPV] 93%). Subjective symptoms occurred in four of 13 positive and three of 11 negative challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Facial thermography consistently detects a significant early rise in nasal temperature during positive compared with negative food challenges, which is evident before objective symptoms occur. Thermography may therefore provide a sensitive method to determine outcome of food challenges and investigate the pathophysiology of food allergic reactions.

Efficacy of a management plan based on severity assessment in longitudinal and case-controlled studies of 747 children with nut allergy: proposal for good practice.

BACKGROUND: There are few data on the long-term management of children with peanut/nut allergy. Advice is variable and often inadequate; further reactions are common. There is no consensus on the criteria for prescription of rescue medication, particularly adrenaline. METHOD: A longitudinal prospective and case-control study in a tertiary allergy clinic. Patients/parents/school staff of 747 children with confirmed peanut or tree nut allergy received detailed verbal and written advice on nut avoidance, training in recognition and (self-) treatment of reactions and a written treatment plan. The severity of nut allergy was graded (mild-severe) and emergency medication was allocated according to our criteria: all received oral antihistamines, injected adrenaline (EpiPen) was given to those with reactions with airway narrowing, milder reactions to low-dose exposure or concomitant asthma. At annual follow-up over 25 906 patient-months (median: 39 months) retraining was given and details of further reactions (frequency, severity and treatment) were obtained. Criteria for allocation of EpiPen were evaluated. RESULTS: The worst reaction pre-enrolment was mild in 64% and moderate/severe in 36% (airway narrowing). Of 615 subjects followed up, 21% had a further reaction (eightfold reduction in frequency), mostly mild. There was a 60-fold reduction in the frequency of severe reactions. Of those with a moderate-severe initial reaction, 99.5% had no or a less severe follow-up reaction. No child with a mild or severe index reaction had a severe follow-up reaction. Only 1/615 (0.2%) had a severe follow-up reaction and only 2/615 (0.3%) used adrenaline, both successfully and had it available according to our criteria. Of mild-moderate reactions, 77% required oral antihistamines alone and 15% no treatment. Children who had follow-up reactions had more frequent and severe reactions pre-enrolment. CONCLUSION: The management plan greatly reduced the frequency and severity of further reactions and was successful for all children. Our criteria for selective prescription of EpiPen in the context of this management plan were appropriate. This is the first study to provide evidence on which to inform practice.

Interpretation of tests for nut allergy in one thousand patients, in relation to allergy or tolerance.

BACKGROUND: Peanut and tree nut allergy are common, increasing in prevalence and the commonest food cause of anaphylaxis. In the USA, 7.8% are sensitized (have nut-specific IgE), but not all those sensitized are allergic. Lack of data makes interpretation of tests for nut-specific IgE difficult. OBJECTIVES: This is the first study to investigate the clinical significance of test results for peanut and tree nut allergy in allergic or tolerant patients. Findings are related to the severity of the allergy. METHOD: An observational study of 1000 children and adults allergic to at least one nut. History of reactions (severity graded) or tolerance to up to five nuts was obtained and skin prick test (SPT)/serum-specific IgE (CAP) performed. RESULTS: There was no correlation between SPT size and graded severity of worst reaction for all nuts combined or for peanut, hazelnut, almond and walnut. For CAP, there was no correlation for all nuts. Where patients tolerated a nut, 43% had positive SPT of 3-7 mm and 3% > or = 8 mm. For CAP, 35% were positive (0.35-14.99 kU/L) and 5% > or = 15 kU/L. In SPT range 3-7 mm, 54% were allergic and 46% were tolerant. There was poor concordance between SPT and CAP (66%). Of patients with a clear nut-allergic history, only 0.5% had negative SPT, but 22% negative CAP. CONCLUSIONS: Magnitude of SPT or CAP does not predict clinical severity, with no difference between minor urticaria and anaphylaxis. SPT is more reliable than CAP in confirming allergy. Forty-six per cent of those tolerant to a nut have positive tests > or = 3 mm (sensitized but not allergic). One cannot predict clinical reactivity from results in a wide 'grey area' of SPT 3-7 mm; 22% of negative CAPs are falsely reassuring and 40% of positive CAPs are misleading. This emphasizes the importance of the history. Understanding this is essential for accurate diagnosis. Patients with SPT > or = 8 mm and CAP > or = 15 kU/L were rarely tolerant so these levels are almost always (in > or = 95%) diagnostic.

Interleukin-10 levels increase in cutaneous biopsies of patients undergoing wasp venom immunotherapy.

We have studied the influence of wasp venom immunotherapy (VIT) on cellular recruitment and cytokine mRNA expression during allergen-induced cutaneous late-phase responses (LPR). Nine subjects with a history of wasp sting anaphylaxis, and specific IgE in their sera underwent wasp VIT. Skin biopsies were taken 24 h after intradermal diluent and allergen before and after 3 months VIT. Pre-immunotherapy, there were significant allergen-induced increases in EG2(+) eosinophils, elastase(+) neutrophils, CD68(+) macrophages and IL-10 protein(+) cells, and increased expression of mRNA for IL-4, IL-13, IFN-gamma, IL-12, IL-10, TGF-beta, RANTES and eotaxin. When these allergen-induced changes in cytokine mRNA and cellular profiles were compared with those obtained after 3 months VIT there was a significant reduction in IL-4 mRNA (p=0.012) and increase in IL-10 protein(+) cells (p=0.004) with a trend to an increase in IL-10 mRNA (p=0.054). There were also significant reductions in eosinophils (p<0.004) and the size of the cutaneous LPR (p<0.01) but no change in mRNA to IFN-gamma, IL-13 or IL-12. Therefore, VIT is associated with a significant increase in cells positive for IL-10 protein but not IL-12 or IFN-gamma. These results suggest that induction of IL-10 may be important in VIT and occur independently of the switch to a Th1 phenotype. IL-10 generation may down-regulate IL-4 expression and eosinophil recruitment.