Internal neurolysis: 'nerve combing' for trigeminal neuralgia without neurovascular conflict - early UK outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Internal neurolysis (INL) is a surgical procedure where trigeminal nerve fibres are separated between the pons and porus trigeminus to relieve trigeminal neuralgia (TN). We report pain and functional outcomes to evaluate its safety and efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort of all patients undergoing retrosigmoid craniotomy and INL between 2015 and 2017 at University Hospital Southampton. Patients with type I (6) or type II (2) refractory TN and no clear neurovascular conflict were offered INL as an alternative to partial sensory rhizotomy. Barrow Pain Intensity Scale (BNI) and Brief Pain Inventory Facial scores (BPI-Facial) were assessed. Minimum follow-up was 2 years'. RESULTS: Eight patients (7F:1M) underwent INL. Two had MS. Pre-operatively, all had severe pain (BNI grade V) and the median BPI-Facial score was 115 (range 79-123).. There were no unexpected complications. On last follow-up, six (75%) had no pain (BNI grade I), while two (25%) had recurred (at 5 and 27 months). Median BPI-Facial score for all patients on the last follow-up was 20 (range 18-91) reflecting dramatically improved quality of life and activities. CONCLUSIONS: INL is a potentially safe and effective treatment for refractory TN. Long-term efficacy is unknown, but early results are promising.

CovidNeuroOnc: A UK multicenter, prospective cohort study of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the neuro-oncology service.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected cancer services. Our objective was to determine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on decision making and the resulting outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent intracranial tumors. METHODS: We performed a multicenter prospective study of all adult patients discussed in weekly neuro-oncology and skull base multidisciplinary team meetings who had a newly diagnosed or recurrent intracranial (excluding pituitary) tumor between 01 April and 31 May 2020. All patients had at least 30-day follow-up data. Descriptive statistical reporting was used. RESULTS: There were 1357 referrals for newly diagnosed or recurrent intracranial tumors across 15 neuro-oncology centers. Of centers with all intracranial tumors, a change in initial management was reported in 8.6% of cases (n = 104/1210). Decisions to change the management plan reduced over time from a peak of 19% referrals at the start of the study to 0% by the end of the study period. Changes in management were reported in 16% (n = 75/466) of cases previously recommended for surgery and 28% of cases previously recommended for chemotherapy (n = 20/72). The reported SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was similar in surgical and non-surgical patients (2.6% vs. 2.4%, P > .9). CONCLUSIONS: Disruption to neuro-oncology services in the UK caused by the COVID-19 pandemic was most marked in the first month, affecting all diagnoses. Patients considered for chemotherapy were most affected. In those recommended surgical treatment this was successfully completed. Longer-term outcome data will evaluate oncological treatments received by these patients and overall survival.

An Evaluation of Commonly Used External Ventricular Drain Securement Methods in a Porcine Model: Recommendations to Improve Practice.

BACKGROUND: External ventricular drain (EVD) dislodgement is common and leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Many securement techniques to prevent this are described. There are, however, no objective studies comparing them. This study aimed to determine the most secure method of securing an EVD. METHODS: A survey was distributed through the British Neurosurgical Trainee Research Collaborative to determine common EVD securement methods and select techniques for testing. Securement methods were tested in a pig cadaver model. Peak pull force before EVD failure was measured. Failure was defined as catheter displacement 1 cm from the insertion site, catheter fracture, or suture fracture. RESULTS: Twenty-three neurosurgical units responded. Five basic EVD securement methods were in common use. These were tested in isolation and in combination so that in total 15 common methods were tested. The most secure method was a triple construct, consisting of an anchoring suture, sutures around a coil of the catheter, and either a soft plastic flange (25.85 N, 95% confidence interval 24.95 N-26.75 N) or a hard plastic flange (29.05 N, 95% confidence interval 25.69 N-32.41 N). Of the individual methods, single anchoring sutures, soft flanges, VentriFix, and staples were found to be the least secure, whereas multiple sutures and hard flanges were the most secure. CONCLUSIONS: An anchoring suture followed by a coil of the catheter and finally a flange is the most secure method for securing EVDs. This simple technique can withstand up to 8.2 times the force of a single anchoring suture, is easily used, and decreases the likelihood of EVD dislodgement and associated complications.