Association of peak factor VIII levels and area under the curve with bleeding in patients with haemophilia A on every third day pharmacokinetic-guided prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: We previously showed that pharmacokinetic-guided prophylaxis (PKP) allows the dosing interval to be extended while maintaining a specific trough level. However, the associations of peak factor VIII (FVIII) levels and area under the curve (AUC) with breakthrough bleeding have not been investigated. AIM: The aim of this study was to analyse data from the PKP arm to determine whether peak FVIII levels, AUC and time with FVIII levels in a haemostatically effective range are independent predictors of bleeding during prophylaxis. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the association of FVIII levels and AUC with annualized bleeding rate in 34 patients on PKP. RESULTS: During 1 year of PKP, 131 bleeding episodes occurred in 24/34 patients. Average peak FVIII levels ranged from 24 to 168 IU dL(-1) , with higher values associated with a decreased risk for all bleeding (joint and non-joint; P < 0.01) and joint bleeding (P < 0.01). Following rFVIII infusion, median percent of time spent with FVIII levels >20 IU dL(-1) was 22%; median AUC was 1363. Both values were significantly associated with a lower ABR when targeting a 1% trough at 72 h. CONCLUSION: When PKP was administered every third day, higher peak FVIII levels, higher AUC and more time spent per week with FVIII levels >20 IU dL(-1) provided increased protection from joint and non-joint bleeding. These data highlight the potential impact of variability in individual pharmacokinetic and bleeding risk and support the need for high peak levels and AUC in some patients treated every third day. The findings do not necessarily apply to alternate-day or other prophylactic dosing regimens.

Development of novel treatment options for patients with haemophilia.

UNLABELLED: Treatment of haemophilia has vastly improved over the last years, but many needs are still unmet. Baxter is continuously pursuing the aim to provide new therapeutic options to patients with haemophilia and to their treating physicians. In fact, there are several opportunities to improve existing therapies, e.g., by new indications for existing products, the introduction of new products, and by novel therapeutic approaches other than factor replacement. Among these, Baxter is working on a number of innovations, such as pharmacokinetics-tailored factor VIII prophylaxis, bypassing agent prophylaxis with FEIBA in inhibitor patients, development of a longer acting pegylated recombinant FVIII, a new recombinant factor IX, a new recombinant factor FVIIa, the first recombinant von Willebrand factor, recombinant ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) as well as gene therapy to cure haemophilia B. CONCLUSION: Baxter is truly committed to the benefit for the patient, and therefore engaged in providing a more and more individualized treatment, in increasing efficiency of current products, in developing new products and new approaches with added value.

The relative burden of haemophilia A and the impact of target joint development on health-related quality of life: results from the ADVATE Post-Authorization Safety Surveillance (PASS) study.

Studies with haemophilia A (HA) patients have shown burden in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) when compared with general population norms. In the current study, HA patients' SF-36v2 health survey scores were compared with general population norms and to patients with other chronic conditions. The impact of target joints (TJs) on HRQOL was also examined. The sample was a subset of HA patients enrolled in the Post-Authorization Safety Surveillance (PASS) programme: a prospective open-label study in which ADVATE [Antihaemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Plasma/Albumin-Free Method] was prescribed. A total of 205 patients who were ≥ 18 years old and had SF-36v2 baseline scores were selected for this study. To measure the burden of HA on HRQOL, manova analyses compared these SF-36v2 scores to age- and gender-matched general population US and EU norms and to patients from other chronic condition groups. manova and correlational analyses examined the relations among TJ, age and SF-36v2 scores. Comparisons with general population norms confirm that HA negatively impacts physical, but not mental, HRQOL. Comparison with other chronic conditions shows the physical burden of HA is greater than for chronic back pain but similar to diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis, while the mental burden of HA is less than for all three patient groups. The presence of TJs was negatively associated with physical HRQOL, although this association was much larger for older patients (45+ years) than for younger ones. Physical, but not mental, HRQOL is diminished in HA patients. Target joints are associated with lower physical HRQOL, although this effect is moderated by age.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of plasma- and albumin-free recombinant factor VIII in children and adults: the influence of blood sampling schedule on observed age-related differences and implications for dose tailoring.

BACKGROUND: Dose tailoring of coagulation factors requires reliably estimated and reproducible pharmacokinetics (PK) in the individual patient. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the contribution of both biological and methodological factors to the observed variability of factor VIII (FVIII) PK, with the focus on differences between children and adults, and to examine the implications for dosing. PATIENTS: Data from 52 1-6-year-old and 100 10-65-year-old patients with hemophilia A (FVIII < or = 2 IU dL(-1)) in three clinical studies were included. RESULTS: In vivo recovery was lower, weight-adjusted clearance was higher and FVIII half-life was on average shorter in children than in adults. However, a reduced blood sampling schedule for children was estimated to account for up to one half of the total observed differences. Intrapatient variance in PK was smaller than interpatient variance in 10-65-year-olds. Age and ratio of actual to ideal weight only showed weak relationships with PK parameters. Variance in PK caused large variance in the calculated dose required to maintain a target FVIII trough level during prophylactic treatment. CONCLUSION: Differences in blood sampling schedules should be taken into account when results from different PK studies are compared. However, even with this consideration, PK cannot be predicted from observable patient characteristics but must be determined for the individual. Because the influence of reducing the blood sampling was minor in comparison to the true variance between patients, a reduced blood sampling protocol can be used. Low intrapatient variability supports the use of PK measurements for dose tailoring of FVIII.

Factor VIII requirement to maintain a target plasma level in the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A: influences of variance in pharmacokinetics and treatment regimens.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic factor (F)VIII has been shown to reduce bleeds and arthropathy in patients with severe hemophilia A. OBJECTIVES: Assuming that the trough FVIII level is an important determinant of the efficacy of prophylaxis, this paper addresses the effect of the inter-patient variability in pharmacokinetics and different dosing regimens on trough levels. METHODS: Simulations used FVIII half-lives and in vivo recoveries (IVR), observed during clinical trials with Advate [Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Plasma/Albumin-Free Method], and commonly used prophylactic regimens to calculate their effect on FVIII levels during prophylaxis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Half-life and dose frequency had a larger effect on trough FVIII and time per week with FVIII<1 IU dL(-1) than IVR and infused dose per kg. The combined effect of these parameters resulted in substantial inter-patient variability in the amount of FVIII required to sustain a desired trough level. Prophylactic regimens based on Monday, Wednesday, Friday dosing were less cost effective in maintaining a desired trough level throughout the week. Dose escalation on Friday to cover the weekend would require potentially harmful doses of FVIII in many patients, especially in young children where more than 50% would require a Friday dose of over 100 IU kg(-1) and some would require more than 400 IU kg(-1). Knowledge of individual patients' half-lives and alteration of frequency of infusions may allow the more cost-effective use of FVIII and potentially expand access to prophylaxis to a greater number of patients, especially in regions where healthcare resources are scarce.

Cost minimization analysis to compare activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC) and recombinant factor VIIa for haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing major orthopaedic surgeries.

Benefits of bypassing agents for maintaining haemostasis in major surgeries have been described in the literature; however, their use has a substantial economic impact. This study assessed the cost of FEIBA, an activated prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) when used in inhibitor patients undergoing major surgeries. After reviewing published literature, a cost minimization model was developed describing dosing regimens recommended and used during major surgeries for FEIBA (pre-operative: 75-100 U kg(-1); postoperative: 75-100 U kg(-1) q 8-12 h days 1-5 and 75-100 U kg(-1) q 12 h days 6-14) and rFVIIa (pre-operative: 90 microg kg(-1); intra-operative: 90 microg kg(-1) q 2 h; postoperative: 90 microg kg(-1) q 2-4 h days 1-5 and 90 microg kg(-1) q 6 h days 6-14). Using a 75 kg patient and US prices, total drug cost was calculated for three scenarios: use of FEIBA or rFVIIa alone and a third case combining rFVIIa pre- and intra-operative and FEIBA throughout a 14-day postoperative period. Dosage amounts of modelled bypassing agents were similar to cases in the literature. Using FEIBA instead of rFVIIa would decrease total drug cost by >50% and save over $400,000 per surgery. Sequential use of both bypassing agents would increase total drug cost by 9% when compared with FEIBA alone, but would remain >40% lower than rFVIIa alone. Univariate sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of results. As large amounts of bypassing agents are necessary for patients with inhibitors to undergo major surgeries, cost is a major consideration. Use of FEIBA alone or in combination with rFVIIa has emerged as a cost-saving approach.

Plasma and albumin-free recombinant factor VIII: pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety in previously treated pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of factor VIII replacement therapy in preschool previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia A have not been well characterized. OBJECTIVES: To assess the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of a plasma-free recombinant FVIII concentrate, ADVATE [Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Plasma/Albumin-Free Method, rAHF-PFM], in children < 6 years of age with severe hemophilia. PATIENTS/METHODS: Fifty-two boys, one girl, mean (+/- SD) age 3.1 +/- 1.5 years and >or= 50 days of prior FVIII exposure, were enrolled in a prospective study of ADVATE rAHF-PFM at 23 centers. RESULTS: The mean terminal phase half-life (t(1/2)) was 9.88 +/- 1.89 h, and the mean adjusted in vivo recovery (IVR) was 1.90 +/- 0.43 IU dL(-1) (IU kg(-1))(-1). Over the 1-6-year age range, t(1/2) of rAHF-PFM increased by 0.40 h year(-1). IVR increased by 0.095IU dL(-1)(IU kg(-1))(-1) (kg m(-2))(-1) in relation to body mass index (BMI). Patients primarily received prophylaxis. Median (range) annual joint bleeds were 0.0 (0.0-5.8), 0.0 (0.0-6.1) and 14.2 (0.0-34.5) for standard prophylaxis, modified prophylaxis and on-demand treatment, respectively. Bleeds were managed in 90% (319/354) of episodes with one or two rAHF-PFM infusions; response was rated excellent/good in 93.8% of episodes. Over a median 156 exposure days, no FVIII inhibitors were detected and no related severe adverse events or unusual non-serious adverse events were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Children < 6 years of age appear to have shorter FVIII t(1/2) and lower IVR values than older subjects. However, these parameters increased with age (t(1/2)) and BMI (adjusted IVR), respectively. rAHF-PFM was clinically effective and well tolerated, with no signs of increased immunogenicity in previously treated young children with hemophilia A.

A cost minimization model for the treatment of minor bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors.

Treatment of acute bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) most often involves the use of bypassing haemostatic agents, such as activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) or recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa). We constructed a cost minimization model to compare the costs of initial treatment with aPCC vs. rFVIIa in the home treatment of minor bleeding episodes. We developed a clinical scenario describing such a case and presented it to a panel of US haemophilia specialists. For each product class, we asked panellists to provide dosing regimens required to achieve complete resolution of a minor haemarthrosis in a child with high-titre inhibitors, and for the probabilities of success at two time points (8-12 and 24 h). Consensus among the panellists was refined by a second round of the process, and the median values resulting were used as inputs to a decision analysis model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine threshold values for key variables. The base case model found that initial treatment with aPCC would result in a mean cost per episode of 21 000 dollars, compared with 33 400 dollars for initial treatment with rFVIIa. Sensitivity analyses over a range of clinically plausible values for cost, dosing, and efficacy did not change the selection of aPCC as the dominant strategy.

Clinical evaluation of an advanced category antihaemophilic factor prepared using a plasma/albumin-free method: pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety in previously treated patients with haemophilia A.

The efficacy and safety of an advanced category recombinant antihaemophilic factor produced by a plasma- and albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM) was studied in 111 previously treated subjects with haemophilia A. The study comprised a randomized, double-blinded, crossover pharmacokinetic comparison of rAHF-PFM and RECOMBINATE rAHF (R-FVIII); prophylaxis (three to four times per week with 25-40 IU kg(-1) rAHF-PFM) for at least 75 exposure days; and treatment of episodic haemorrhagic events. Median age was 18 years, 96% of subjects had baseline factor VIII <1%, and 108 received study drug. Bioequivalence, based on area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve and adjusted in vivo recovery, was demonstrated for rAHF-PFM and R-FVIII. Mean (+/-SD) half-life for rAHF-PFM was 12.0 +/- 4.3 h. Among 510 bleeding events, 473 (93%) were managed with one or two infusions of rAHF-PFM and 439 (86%) had efficacy ratings of excellent or good. Subjects who were less adherent to the prophylactic regimen had a higher bleeding rate (9.9 episodes subject(-1) year(-1)) than subjects who were more adherent (4.4 episodes subject(-1) year(-1); P < 0.03). One subject developed a low titre, non-persistent inhibitor (2.0 BU) after 26 exposure days. These data demonstrate that rAHF-PFM is bioequivalent to R-FVIII, and suggest that rAHF-PFM is efficacious and safe, without increased immunogenicity, for the treatment of haemophilia A.

Inhibitor development in patients receiving recombinant factor VIII (Recombinate rAHF/Bioclate): a prospective pharmacovigilance study.

Clinical trials to date have not been adequately powered to assess comparatively infrequent events such as inhibitor development in previously treated patients (PTPs). Comprehensive large-scale pharmacovigilance studies can be useful for this purpose. We prospectively collected inhibitor development reports worldwide among recipients of Recombinate rAHF recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII), also formerly distributed under the product name Bioclate, for the entire postlicensure period from 1993 through 2002. To determine level of exposure to rFVIII we also compiled the Recombinate rAHF/Bioclate International Units (IU) distributed annually. To estimate inhibitor incidence separately for previously untreated or minimally treated patients (PUPs) with 1-50 exposure days and PTPs with >50 exposure days, we used haemophilia A incidence and prevalence data and pooled mean annual rFVIII consumption per PUP and PTP from international multicentre prospective clinical trials. Documented inhibitor cases totalled 89, and the total quantity of Recombinate rAHF/Bioclate rFVIII distributed was 6.48 x10(9) IU. No lot association or other clustering of inhibitor events was evident in PTPs. The incidence of all reported inhibitors, expressed as a percentage of patients treated, was 11.9% (CI: 5.05-28.0%) for PUPs when compared with 0.123% (CI: 0.030-0.512%) for PTPs. The rates for high-titre inhibitors (>5 BU) only were 5.96% (CI: 3.00-11.8%) for PUPs and 0.0554% (CI: 0.0113-0.271%) for PTPs. Thus, incidence rates for both all inhibitors and high-titre inhibitors in PTPs were 1% of the corresponding rates in PUPs. Data from prospective PUP clinical trials involving intensive active monitoring suggest that true inhibitor incidence may be approximately twice that estimated in this pharmacovigilance study. Nevertheless, inhibitor development in PTPs receiving Recombinate rAHF/Bioclate is infrequent.

Consensus recommendations for use of central venous access devices in haemophilia.

Venous access is essential for delivery of haemophilia factor concentrate. Wherever possible, peripheral veins remain the route of choice, and the use of central venous access devices (CVADs) should be limited to cases of clear need in patients with caregivers able to exercise diligence in CVAD care and should continue no longer than necessary. CVADs are of recognized value for repeated administration of coagulation factors in haemophilia, particularly for prophylaxis and immune tolerance therapy and in young children. Evidence to guide best practices has been fragmentary, and standardized methods for CVAD usage have yet to be established. We have developed management recommendations based upon available published evidence as well as extensive clinical experience. These recommendations address patient and CVAD selection; CVAD placement, care and removal; caregiver/patient guidance; and complications, including infection and thrombosis. In the absence of inhibitors, ports are recommended, primarily because of fewer associated infections than with external catheters. For patients with inhibitors, ports also appear to be associated with fewer infections. Infection is the most frequent complication, and recommendations to prevent and treat infections are supported by extensive clinical data and experience. Strict adherence to handwashing and aseptic technique are essential elements of catheter care. Evidence-based data regarding the detection and treatment of CVAD-related thrombotic complications are limited. Caregiver education is an integral part of CVAD use and the procedural practices of users should be regularly re-assessed. These recommendations provide a basis for sound current CVAD practice and are expected to undergo further refinements as new evidence is compiled and clinical experience is gained.

Hemophilia therapy innovation: development of an advanced category recombinant factor VIII by a plasma/albumin-free method. Proceedings of a Special Symposium at the XIXth Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, July 12-18, 2003, Birmingham, UK.

Replacement therapy for hemophilia A has evolved from the early use of whole blood, citrated plasma, and cryoprecipitate, to purified factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates, first derived from plasma, then produced by recombinant DNA technology. Recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) concentrates have provided improved safety for patients with hemophilia A since they significantly reduce the risk of transmission of blood-borne infections. Nevertheless, human- or animal-derived plasma proteins are still included at some step in preparation of all previously licensed rFVIII, thereby introducing the potential for transmission of human or animal pathogens. Anti-hemophilic factor (recombinant), plasma/albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM), a novel advanced category rFVIII produced without the addition of human or animal plasma proteins, has been developed with the goal of providing the greatest possible margin of safety to hemophilia patients. This report, based on a symposium of the XIXth International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress, provides an overview of the rAHF-PFM development program as well as current findings from the global clinical evaluation of rAHF-PFM in pediatric and adult previously treated patients.

Successful treatment for patients with von Willebrand disease undergoing urgent surgery using factor VIII/VWF concentrate (Humate-P).

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by insufficient von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity. It has been proposed that VWF:ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) activity may be useful in evaluating the response to VWD treatment in patients who require replacement therapy. This prospective, open-label, non-randomized study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a factor VIII (FVIII)/VWF concentrate (Humate-P) used in treatment regimens based on VWF:RCo activity in subjects with VWD in situations requiring urgent and necessary surgery. This article summarizes the results for 39 subjects with 42 evaluable surgical treatment events, 100% of which were rated as excellent/good for overall efficacy (achievement of haemostasis). The median loading dose based upon VWF:RCo activity was 82.3 international units/kilogram (IU kg(-1); range 32.5-216.8 IU kg(-1)), and the median maintenance dose per infusion was 52.8 IU kg(-1) (range 24.2-196.5 IU kg(-1)) for a median of 3 days (range 1-50 days). The median number of infusions per event was 6 (range 1-67 infusions). Three unanticipated adverse events (peripheral oedema, extremity pain and pseudo-thrombocytopenia) from two surgical treatment events were reported that were potentially treatment-related. No serious drug-related adverse events (AEs) were observed, and no thrombotic events were reported in this study. This study supports the safety and efficacy of the FVIII/VWF concentrate Humate-P for the prevention of surgical haemorrhage in patients with VWD when administered in doses calculated in VWF:RCo units.

The economic impact of factor VIII inhibitors in patients with haemophilia.

The impact on the cost of care for haemophilia patients with inhibitors is not well defined. To quantify the effect on health care expenditures associated with inhibitors to factor VIII (FVIII) or FIX, we conducted a retrospective cohort study examining product use and outcomes in adult and paediatric haemophilia patients with and without inhibitors. Twelve patients with inhibitors to FVIII or FIX (cases) identified in the haemophilia surveillance system (HSS) at two centres were matched on age, severity of haemophilia, and treatment centre to haemophilia patients without inhibitors. Patients with HIV or significant liver disease were excluded from the study. All eligible non-inhibitor control patients were selected for inclusion in the study, resulting in a total of 28 controls. We then tracked product usage and hospitalizations from programme entry until 1998 or loss to follow-up, producing a total database of 184 person-years of experience. A descriptive matched analysis was conducted to examine annual differences in the cost of product used and hospitalizations. We found that the median cost for factor products among haemophilia patients with inhibitors was $55,853/year, $2,760 less than comparable haemophilia patients without inhibitors. The median number of hospitalizations per year was 1.0 for both inhibitor and non-inhibitor patients and the median number of days hospitalized was virtually the same. Although these findings do not appear to support the belief that there is a substantial increase in the cost of care for haemophilia patients with inhibitors, it does document that a few outlier patients can drive the cost of treatment for this disease. As the largest component of the cost of care is that of factor concentrate, it becomes imperative in the current health care environment to better define the true costs and benefits of treatments designed to eradicate or manage inhibitors. A careful cost accounting of immune tolerance induction (ITI) and other therapeutic strategies, taking into account successes and failures and duration and intensity of therapy, should help to better define the costs and benefits of such approaches. Methods to identify high cost inhibitor patients should be developed so that these strategies may be targeted to appropriate candidates.

Successful treatment of urgent bleeding in von Willebrand disease with factor VIII/VWF concentrate (Humate-P): use of the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo) to measure potency and to guide therapy.

This prospective, open-label, non-randomized study evaluated the safety and efficacy of factor VIII (FVIII)/von Willebrand Factor (VWF) concentrate (Humate-P) using treatment regimens based on VWF:ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) activity in patients with von Willebrand Disease (VWD) in (i) urgent bleeding episodes, or (ii) in patients undergoing urgent and necessary surgery. This article summarizes the results of treatment for the 33 patients with 53 urgent bleeding events. The median loading dose of FVIII/VWF concentrate was 67.0 international units per kilogram (IU kg(-1)) VWF:RCo (range 25.7-143.2 IU kg(-1)), and the median daily maintenance dose per infusion was 74.0 IU kg(-1) (range 16.4-182.9 IU kg(-1)) for a median duration of 2 days (range 1-34 days). The overall efficacy (achievement of haemostasis) of FVIII/VWF concentrate was rated as excellent/good for 98% of the urgent bleeding events. No unexpected treatment-related adverse events or serious drug-related adverse events (AEs) were observed. This study supports the safety and efficacy of Humate-P administered in doses calculated in VWF:RCo units for the treatment of urgent bleeding episodes in patients with VWD.

Porcine factor VIII: pharmacoeconomics of inhibitor therapy.

The treatment of acquired haemophilia is characteristically exceedingly expensive and thus a cost-benefit analysis of the several available treatment strategies is urgently needed. To address this issue, decision-analysis techniques were used to construct a cost-minimization model to compare the cost of treatment with porcine factor VIII (pFVIII), human FVIII (hFVIII) or an activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC). This model was based upon the results of a comprehensive literature search of all relevant clinical studies and case series. To supplement these data, a panel of haemophilia specialists was presented with a clinical scenario describing an acquired haemophilia patient with an acute haemorrhage in whom the human and porcine inhibitor titres were initially unknown. Based on this scenario and on their own clinical experience, the expert panel assessed the applicability of the model as initially constructed, assigned probabilities of success to each treatment and recommended appropriate initial dosing and follow-up regimens. This information was incorporated into the model and a simulation was conducted from which the costs of care were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were then conducted on all parameters. The results of the model show that treatment initiated with pFVIII would be more cost effective compared with treatment sequences initiated with an APCC or hFVIII, respectively. The model indicates that initial treatment with pFVIII in this scenario may be the preferred strategy clinically, as well as on economic grounds.