Use of K-Y Jelly on Throat Packs for Postoperative Sore Throat after Nasal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a fairly common side effect of general anesthesia. The K-Y jelly is a well-known lubricant used in many medical procedures. Objective In this randomized study, we evaluated the use of throat packs soaked with K-Y jelly for POST outcomes in patients submitted to nasal surgery. Methods The present double-blinded, randomized, controlled study included 140 ASA I-II patients undergoing nasal surgery under general anesthesia. Patients received either or K-Y jelly or water-soaked X-ray detectable throat packs fully inserted into the mouth to occlude the oropharynx. Results Comparison between the studied groups regarding the severity of POST assessed by visual analog scale revealed significantly lower POST levels in the K-Y jelly group on recovery from anesthesia, and at 2, 4, and 6 hours postoperatively. Conclusions The use of K-Y jelly-soaked throat packs was associated with less severe POST after nasal surgery.

Use of K-Y Jelly on Throat Packs for Postoperative Sore Throat after Nasal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Introduction Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a fairly common side effect of general anesthesia. The K-Y jelly is a well-known lubricant used in many medical procedures. Objective In this randomized study, we evaluated the use of throat packs soaked with K-Y jelly for POST outcomes in patients submitted to nasal surgery. Methods The present double-blinded, randomized, controlled study included 140 ASA I-II patients undergoing nasal surgery under general anesthesia. Patients received either or K-Y jelly or water-soaked X-ray detectable throat packs fully inserted into the mouth to occlude the oropharynx. Results Comparison between the studied groups regarding the severity of POST assessed by visual analog scale revealed significantly lower POST levels in the K-Y jelly group on recovery from anesthesia, and at 2, 4, and 6 hours postoperatively. Conclusions The use of K-Y jelly-soaked throat packs was associated with less severe POST after nasal surgery.

Is quadratus lumborum block combined with low dose-spinal anesthesia an effective alternative to general anesthesia in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia in high-risk patients has many complications and needs long preoperative preparations and postoperative intensive care unit (ICU). Therefore the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combined low-dose spinal anesthesia with quadratus lumborum block (QLB) as an alternative to general anesthesia for patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at the urology department of Al-Azhar University Hospitals in Cairo, Egypt, from January 2021 to January 2022. The study included 60 patients of ASA ll-lll scheduled for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. All patients received low-dose spinal anesthesia (5 mg bupivacaine) and QLB (QL1-QL2-QL3) approaches. The primary observation parameter was the efficacy of this technique as an alternative to general anesthesia. The secondary parameters measured were evaluation of need for intraoperative narcotics, postoperative pain score (VAS), and patients satisfaction as assessed using a 5-point Likert Scale. RESULTS: None of the patients was given general anesthesia, and intraoperative sedation was given to nineteen patients (32.2%). No hemodynamic changes were observed in all patients. There was a significant correlation between the use of intraoperative sedation and stone site, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay. Pain intensity on VAS at rest and movement was low until the 24th postoperative hour. Patient satisfaction score was 3, 4, and 5 in 1 (1.7%), 4 (6.7%), and 55 (91.6%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Combined low-dose spinal anesthesia with quadratus lumborum block is an effective alternative to general anesthesia in patients undergoing PCNL procedures with good postoperative analgesia. Patients with lower calyceal punctures have a lower incidence of intraoperative sedation requirements.

Informational video impact before caesarean delivery on anxiety and satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety prior to caesarean section can lead to a negative birth experience, which may affect different aspects of woman's life in the long term. Improving preoperative information may result in lower anxiety leading to a more positive birth experience. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the impact of informational video before planned caesarean delivery on maternal anxiety and satisfaction. METHODS: Four different databases were searched from inception till March 2023. We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared educational or informative videos about the aspects of the expected caesarean delivery process versus no preoperative information in the control group. No language restrictions were imposed. We used Revman software during performing our meta-analysis. Our main outcomes were preoperative and postoperative anxiety as well as maternal satisfaction post-procedure. RESULTS: Six RCTs were retrieved with a total number of 702 patients. Informative video significantly reduced the anxiety level before caesarean delivery in comparison with the control group (MD = -4.21, 95% CI [-5.46, -2.95], p<0001). Moreover, the postoperative anxiety level was significantly improved in the informational video group (MD = -4.71, 95% CI [-7.06, -2.36], p<0001). In addition, there was a significant improvement in maternal satisfaction score after caesarean delivery among the informational video group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Informational video prior to caesarean delivery decreases preoperative and postoperative anxiety levels with improvement in maternal post-procedure satisfaction. However, the existing evidence is limited by several shortcomings, chiefly small sample size. More trials with larger sample size are required to confirm our findings.

Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block for Pain Management Post-Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of superior hypogastric plexus (SHP) block in pain relief among women undergoing hysterectomy. Cochrane Library, PubMed, ISI web of science, and Scopus were searched from inception to May 2021 for the available randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We included RCTs that compared SHP block (intervention group) to saline (control group) in hysterectomy. Our primary outcomes were pain scores at different time intervals using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Our secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption within 24 hours and postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence. We extracted the available data from included studies and pooled them in a meta-analysis model using RevMan software. Four RCTs with a total number of 289 patients met our inclusion criteria. The VAS pain scores were significantly declined at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), 2, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively among SHP block group (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was reported in VAS pain score 1 day postoperatively between intervention and control groups. Moreover, SHP block significantly reduced the postoperative opioid consumption and incidence of nausea and vomiting (p = 0.03 & p = 0.003). In conclusion, superior hypogastric plexus block effectively reduces postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and incidence of nausea and vomiting post-hysterectomy.

Paravertebral block is a proper alternative anesthesia for outpatient lithotripsy.

CONTEXT: This study evaluated the effectiveness of paravertebral block as an alternative anesthetic technique for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) procedure. A total of 50 patients with renal stones, aged 20-60 years, were randomly allocated into two groups; 25 patients in group P; received unilateral paravertebral block from T8 through L1 with injection of 5 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and 25 patients in group L; received local infiltration by bupivacaine 0.25% (2 mg/kg) into the 30 cm(2) area after localizing the stones site, 10 min before the session. A total of 10 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain every 10 min during the session. At the end of the procedure, total doses of rescue analgesia, the number of shockwaves, their power, and the total duration of shockwave treatment were recorded. After completion of the procedure, the patient was assessed for pain and nausea in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) using the VAS. Patient's satisfaction and time needed to discharge patients to home also were recorded. Time to do the anesthetic technique was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in group-P than group-L, it was 12.7 ± 2.3 min versus 6.9 ± 1.9 min, respectively; intraoperative rescue analgesia by fentanyl was lesser (P < 0.001) in group-P than group-L, 26.7 ± 6.32 mcg versus 78.6 ± 5.41 mcg, respectively, also time interval between ends of the procedure till discharge to home was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in group-P than group-L, it was 99 ± 17 min versus 133 ± 31 min, respectively. VAS was not significant difference between both groups either intraoperative or postoperative in first hour. Patient's satisfaction was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in group-P than group-L, it was 8.8 ± 1.1 versus 6.1 ± 0.6, respectively. Adverse events were lesser, but not significant in group-P than in group-L. Two patients (8%) in group-L and one patient (4%) in the group-P experienced episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Paravertebral block is an effective alternative anesthesia for outpatient lithotripsy; multiple level paravertebral blocks provide an optimal anesthetic condition, with acceptable adverse events for ESWL. And, providing proper analgesia during the procedure and in first hour after finishing of the procedure, early discharge to home and providing better patient's satisfactions. AIMS: This study evaluated the effectiveness of paravertebral block as an alternative anesthetic technique for ESWL procedure. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective open label study. SUBJECT AND METHODS: A total of 50 patients with renal stones, aged 20-60 years, were randomly allocated into two groups; 25 patients in group P; received unilateral paravertebral block from T8 through L1 with injection of 5mL 0.5% bupivacaine and 25 patients in group L; received local infiltration by bupivacaine 0.25% (2 mg/kg) into the 30 cm(2) area after localizing the stones site, 10 min before the session. A total of 10 mm VAS was used to evaluate pain every 10 min during the session. At the end of the procedure, total doses of rescue analgesia, the number of shockwaves, their power, and the total duration of shockwave treatment were recorded. After completion of the procedure, the patient was assessed for pain and nausea in the PACU using the VAS. Patient's satisfaction and time needed to discharge patients to home also were recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The findings of the two groups were statistically compared using SPSS version 12 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, number, and percentage. Nominal nonparametric data were analyzed using Chi-square test. Parametric data were compared using unpaired t-test. Ordinal nonparametric data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: Time to do the anesthetic technique was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in group-P than group-L, it was 12.7 ± 2.3 min versus 6.9 ± 1.9 min, respectively; intraoperative rescue analgesia by fentanyl was lesser (P < 0.001) in group-P than group-L, 26.7 ± 6.32 mcg versus 78.6 ± 5.41 mcg, respectively, also time interval between ends of the procedure till discharge to home was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in group-P than group-L, it was 99 ± 17 min versus 133 ± 31 min, respectively. VAS was not significant difference between both groups either intraoperative or postoperative in first hour. Patient's satisfaction was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in group-P than group-L, it was 8.8 ± 1.1 versus 6.1 ± 0.6, respectively. Adverse events were lesser, but not significant in group-P than in group-L. Two patients (8%) in group-L and one patient (4%) in the group-P experienced episodes of PONV. CONCLUSIONS: Paravertebral block is an effective alternative anesthesia for outpatient lithotripsy; multiple level paravertebral blocks provide an optimal anesthetic condition, with acceptable adverse events for ESWL. And providing proper analgesia during the procedure and in first hour after finishing of the procedure, early discharge to home and providing better patient's satisfactions.