The Kidney Transplant: Maintaining Excellent Outcomes While Increasing Skills Acquisition.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is a complex operation that incorporates multiple fundamental surgical techniques and is an excellent opportunity for surgical skill development during residency training. We hypothesized that increasing resident competency, measured as anastomosis time, could be demonstrated while maintaining high-quality surgical outcomes during the learning process. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of surgical resident involvement in kidney transplantation and recorded the anastomosis time. The study population comprised adult, single organ kidney transplants (n = 2052) at a large academic transplant center between 2006 and 2019. Descriptive statistics included frequencies, medians, and means. A mixed model of anastomosis time on number of procedures was fitted. Poisson models were fitted with outcomes of the number of patients with delayed graft function and number of patients that underwent reoperation postoperatively, with the exposure being number of kidney transplants performed by resident. RESULTS: Results from the mixed model suggest that as the number of times a resident performs the surgery increases, the time to conduct the operation decreases with statistical significance. The Poisson regression demonstrated no significant relationship between the operative volume of a resident and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated statistical evidence that with an increase in the number of renal transplantations performed by a surgical resident, anastomosis time decreased. It also demonstrated no significant relationship between number of kidney transplants performed by a resident and postoperative complications, suggesting that patient outcomes for this operation are not adversely affected by resident involvement.

Analysis of Need for Intervention in Low-Grade Traumatic Splenic Injury.

BACKGROUND: Blunt splenic injuries are common traumatic injuries. Severe injuries may require blood transfusion, procedural, or operative intervention. Conversely, patients with low-grade injuries and normal vital signs frequently do not require intervention. The level and duration of monitoring required to safely manage these patients are unclear. We hypothesize that low-grade splenic trauma has a low rate of intervention and may not require acute hospitalization. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive analysis included patients admitted to a level I trauma center with low injury burden (injury severity score <15) and The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade 1 (G1) and 2 (G2) splenic injuries between January 2017 and December 2019 using the Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons (TRACS). The primary outcome was the need for any intervention. Secondary outcomes included time to intervention and length of stay. RESULTS: 107 patients met inclusion criteria. 87.9% required no intervention . 9.4% required blood products, with a median time to transfusion of 7.4 hours from arrival. All patients receiving blood products had extenuating circumstances such as bleeding from other injuries, anticoagulant use, or medical comorbidities. 2 patients required splenic artery embolization, one presenting with return precautions 9 days post-injury and 1 with significant comorbidities. One patient with concomitant bowel injury required splenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Low-grade blunt splenic trauma has a low rate of intervention, which typically occurs within the first 12 hours of presentation. This suggests that outpatient management with return precautions may be appropriate for select patients after a short interval of observation.

Implementation of General Surgery Care into a Student-Run Free Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) provide medical care to uninsured, and surgical issues are often outside the normal scope of care of these clinics. The Shade Tree Clinic (STC) is an SRFC serving 300 patients with complex medical conditions. This study describes the implementation and efficacy of a General Surgery Specialty Clinic in this setting. METHODS: This descriptive study examines the demographics and referral patterns of patients seen in two pilot Specialty Clinics and other patients evaluated for general surgical issues from December 2017 to January 2020. Providers were surveyed regarding their experience in clinic. RESULTS: Twenty patients were evaluated by six general surgeons during 22 separate encounters (n = 20). Nine patients were seen in two pilot Specialty Clinics for biliary colic, hernia, hemorrhoids, anal mass, toenail lesion, surgical weight loss, and venous insufficiency. Referrals from these clinics to affiliated Vanderbilt University Medical Center included six ultrasounds; referrals to vascular surgery and podiatry clinics; and referrals for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and anal mass excision. STC also directly referred eight patients for colonoscopies and five patients for major operations through primary care clinic. Hundred percent of care was cost-free to patients. Providers reported a median satisfaction score of five with the Specialty Clinics (Very Satisfied; [4, 5]). Hundred percent of providers felt that the concerns of patients were addressed. CONCLUSIONS: A surgery specialty clinic in the setting of an SRFC is an effective way to provide surgical care to underserved populations with the potential to reduce unplanned hospital utilization.