Navigating abortion law dilemmas: experiences and attitudes among Ethiopian health care professionals.

BACKGROUND: Ethiopia's 2005 abortion law improved access to legal abortion. In this study we examine the experiences of abortion providers with the revised abortion law, including how they view and resolve perceived moral challenges. METHODS: Thirty healthcare professionals involved in abortion provisions in Addis Ababa were interviewed. Transcripts were analyzed using systematic text condensation, a qualitative analysis framework. RESULTS: Most participants considered the 2005 abortion law a clear improvement-yet it does not solve all problems and has led to new dilemmas. As a main finding, the law appears to have opened a large space for professionals' individual interpretation and discretion concerning whether criteria for abortion are met or not. Regarding abortion for fetal abnormalities, participants support the woman's authority in deciding whether to choose abortion or not, although several saw these decisions as moral dilemmas. All thought that abortion was a justified choice when a diagnosis of fetal abnormality had been made. CONCLUSION: Ethiopian practitioners experience moral dilemmas in connection with abortion. The law places significant authority, burden and responsibility on each practitioner.

Feeding Experiences of HIV-Exposed Preterm Infants Among Mothers Living with HIV in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Providing adequate nutrition to preterm infants who are born to HIV-positive mothers is more challenging due to the mother's underlying health and nutrition status. The understanding of these issues and active participation of the mothers have a significant role in giving continuous care for HIV-exposed preterm infant. Hence, this study aimed to explore the experience of HIV-positive mothers' feeding practice of their preterm infants, and health workers to identify barriers and facilitators of feeding HIV-exposed preterm infants. METHODS: A phenomenological qualitative study design was conducted in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, between May 1, 2016 and March 31, 2017. Mothers who gave birth to HIV-exposed preterm infants at the study sites' follow-up clinic were traced and invited by the healthcare providers to voluntarily participate in this study. Fifteen in-depth interviews with mothers of HIV-exposed preterm infants and seven key informant interviews with health professionals and policymakers were carried out. The interviews were transcribed and translated and then manually analyzed thematically. RESULTS: The health education given during antenatal care (ANC) did not consider the feeding practice needs for HIV-exposed preterm infants. Child health status, desire to have a healthy infant, financial constraints and family support were among the influential factors in the feeding practice of HIV-exposed preterm infants mentioned by the study participants. HIV-exposed preterm infant feeding procedure neither has a guideline nor is clearly mentioned in the national HIV guidelines. CONCLUSION: The desire to have a healthy infant was a major facilitator for feeding of HIV-exposed premature infants. However, financial constraints majorly limited the option to be only exclusive breastfeeding. This became even more problematic for the mother if the premature infant became ill and could not breastfeed well.

Professionals' experience with conscientious objection to abortion in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: An interview study.

In Ethiopia, conscientious objection (CO) to abortion provision is not allowed due to government regulations. We here report findings from a qualitative interview study of 30 healthcare professionals from different professions working with abortion in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. CO is practised despite the regulations forbidding it. Most informants appeared to be unfamiliar with the prohibition or else did not accord it weight in their moral reasoning. Proponents of institutionalization/toleration of CO claimed that accommodation was often feasible in a hospital setting because colleagues could take over. Opponents pointed to threats to patient access in rural settings especially. Both proponents and opponents invoked tenets of professional ethics, viz., the right not to be coerced into actions one deems unacceptable, or the duty to provide care, respectively. More societal and professional discussion of the ethics and regulation of CO, and a clearer link between legal regulation and ethical guidance for professionals, are called for.

Still a moral dilemma: how Ethiopian professionals providing abortion come to terms with conflicting norms and demands.

BACKGROUND: The Ethiopian law on abortion was liberalized in 2005. However, as a strongly religious country, the new law has remained controversial from the outset. Many abortion providers have religious allegiances, which begs the question how to negotiate the conflicting demands of their jobs and their commitment to their patients on the one hand, and their religious convictions and moral values on the other. METHOD: A qualitative study based on in-depth interviews with 30 healthcare professionals involved in abortion services in either private/non-governmental clinics or in public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Transcripts were analyzed using systematic text condensation, a qualitative analysis framework. RESULTS: For the participants, religious norms and the view that the early fetus has a moral right to life count against providing abortion; while the interests and needs of the pregnant woman supports providing abortion services. The professionals weighed these value considerations differently and reached different conclusions. One group appears to have experienced genuine conflicts of conscience, while another group attempted to reconcile religious norms and values with their work, especially through framing provision of abortion as helping and preventing harm and suffering. The professionals handle this moral balancing act on their own. In general, participants working in the private sector reported less moral dilemma with abortion than did their colleagues from public hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the difficulties in reconciling tensions between religious convictions and moral norms and values, and professional duties. Such insights might inform guidelines and healthcare ethics education.