ABSTRACT
A 64-year-old lady with type 2 diabetes and a non-resolving right foot ulcer, had an indium-111 labelled white cell scan (indium-111 WCS) to investigate the possibility of underlying osteitis. The scan suggested the possibility of infective thrombophlebitis. Unknown to the clinical team who requested the scan and the radiologist who performed it, the lady was admitted to hospital 2 days following the procedure with cellulitis and septic thrombophlebitis in the right leg. There is only one previous report in the literature of septic thrombophlebitis being diagnosed in this way. Perhaps indium-111 WCS has something to offer in the diagnosis of this condition and in determining those who require antibiotic treatment.
Subject(s)
Leukocytes/diagnostic imaging , Streptococcal Infections/diagnostic imaging , Thrombophlebitis/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Indium Radioisotopes , Middle Aged , Radionuclide Imaging , Radiopharmaceuticals , Thrombophlebitis/microbiologyABSTRACT
A prospective double blind randomised trial using 25 ml of Hexabrix 320 (ioxaglate, May and Baker), Niopam 370 (iopamidol, Merck) or Omnipaque 350 (iohexol, Nycomed) intravenous urography was carried out. The results showed no perceptible difference in the diagnostic quality of urograms with each of the media. An additional 25 ml of contrast medium was required by 4% of patients in order to obtain a satisfactory examination. We recommend that a dose of 25 ml of low-osmolar medium be used for all patients with the exception of the obese, those taking diuretics or those who have renal impairment.
