Using Key Informant Method to Determine the Prevalence and Causes of Childhood Blindness in South-Eastern Nigeria.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and causes of childhood blindness in an underserved community in south-eastern Nigeria using the key informant method. METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. Key informants (KI) appointed by their respective communities received 1-day training on identification of blind children in their communities. Two weeks later, the research team visited the agreed sites within the community and examined the identified children. The World Health Organization eye examination record for blind children was used for data collection. Data entry and analysis were done with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0. RESULTS: Fifteen blind or severely visually impaired children (age range 3 months to 15 years) were identified in this community; nine of these were brought by the KIs. The prevalence of childhood blindness/severe visual impairment (BL/SVI) was 0.12 per 1000 children. By anatomical classification, operable cataract in 6 (40.0%) was the leading cause of BL/SVI in the series; followed by optic nerve lesions (atrophy/hypoplasia) in 3 (20.0%). The etiology of BL/SVI is unknown for the majority of the children (66.7%). It was presumed hereditary in four children (26.7%). Sixty percent of the blindness was judged avoidable. Only three children (20.0%) were enrolled in the Special Education Centre for the Blind. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of childhood BL/SVI in our study population is low but over half of the blindness is avoidable. There may be a significant backlog of operable childhood cataract in south-eastern Nigeria. The KI method is a practical method for case finding of blind children in rural communities.

Prevalence, Awareness and Determinants of Diabetic Retinopathy in a Screening Centre in Nigeria.

There is a global rise in the prevalence of diabetes and this has led to a rise in the consequences of diabetes such as diabetic retinopathy (DR). The current study aims to determine the prevalence, awareness and determinants of DR among diabetics who attended a screening centre in Enugu, south-eastern Nigeria. A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out among consenting diabetic patients who visited the centre. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to gather information on demographic details, the knowledge of the participants on effects of diabetes on the eye and previous care they had received for their eyes. Each participant underwent eye examination which included posterior segment examination with slit lamp biomicroscopy with +90DS lens after pupil dilation. A total of 80 eligible participants were examined. The prevalence of any DR among the participants was 32.1 % (95 % CI 20.6-43.5) whereas prevalence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, PDR was 6.4 % and diabetic macular oedema, DME was 31.3 %. Age at onset of diabetes and duration of diabetes were the most determinant factors associated with DR (p = 0.039 and p = 0.000 respectively). Only ten (12.5 %) participants had undergone at least one specific eye examination to check for DR since they were diagnosed with diabetes. The major reason for not having had a prior screening is 'no one referred me for it' (31 participants, 44.3 %). DR is emerging as an important cause of blindness and severe visual impairment. Adequate screening programme and treatment protocol need to be set up for this population even in developing countries to prevent blindness.

Prevalence of presbyopia in a rural African community.

INTRODUCTION: When presbyopia (loss of accommodation of the crystalline lens with increasing age) sets in, doing near work becomes associated with headache and eye strain. Reading and writing become a challenge. Literacy levels may be low in rural communities; nevertheless some work other than reading, like sewing, sorting stone from grain and operating mobile phones, is done with dissatisfaction. This study aims to determine the prevalence of presbyopia, the unmet presbyopia need and the presbyopia correction coverage in a rural African community. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was carried out in a rural population aged 35 years and greater, selected by cluster random sampling. Information was sought on biodata of the participants and they were subsequently examined. Distance visual acuity for each participant was determined. Anterior and posterior segments of the eyes were examined. Objective refraction with subjective refinement was done on all subjects with distant visual acuity less than 6/6. Near visual acuity was assessed at 40 cm with distant correction in place if required. Presbyopia was defined as inability to read N8 at 40 cm or requiring an addition of at least +1.00DS to improve near vision to at least N8. Questionnaires were administered to those identified as presbyopic on source of procurement of spectacles (if they had one) and on reasons for non-procurement of presbyopic spectacles. They were also asked to rate their difficulty with various listed near work. Data entry and analysis were done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v16.0 and Program for Epidemiologist v4.01 software. RESULTS: A total of 585 subjects (participation rate 81.1%) aged 35 years and greater were interviewed and examined. The prevalence of presbyopia was 63.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 62.6-64.2%). There was increasing prevalence with increasing age. The met presbyopia need was 17.6%, unmet need was 45.8% and presbyopic correction coverage was 27.8%. The commonest reasons for not procuring presbyopic correction were 'not a priority' (21.5%) and 'cost' (21.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of presbyopia in this rural African community is high. Many who need presbyopic correction do not have corrective spectacles.

Challenges in the management of paediatric cataract in a developing country.

AIM: To review the management of cataract in children in a tertiary hospital in a developing country, and to highlight the challenges therein. METHODS: The hospital records of children aged 15 years or less that had cataract surgery at University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu from 2005 to 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. Information was obtained on bio-data, pre- and post-operative visual acuity (VA), biometry, and type of surgery, use of intraocular lens (IOL) and presence of co-morbidity. SPSS was used for data entry and analysis. RESULTS: The hospital records of 21 children (26 eyes) were analyzed. There were 12 males (57.1%) and 9 females (42.9%). Pre-operative VA could not be assessed in 11 eyes (42.3%), 14 eyes (53.9%) had VA <3/60 and 1 eye (3.8%) had VA 6/60. Biometry was done in only 5 eyes (19.2%). All eyes had standard extracapsular cataract extraction without primary posterior capsulectomy; 12 eyes (46.2%) had posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC-IOL) implant while 13 eyes (50.0%) had no IOL. After 12 weeks of follow up, vision assessment was available in only 15 eyes. With best correction, VA of 6/18 or better was achieved in only 5 eyes (33.3%). CONCLUSION: Inadequate facilities and inadequate follow up after surgery are some of the challenges in managing paediatric cataract in the developing countries. If these challenges are not addressed, cataract will remain a major cause of childhood blindness and low vision in Africa for many years. There should be collaboration between Paediatric Ophthalmology Centres in industrialized and developing countries to enhance skill transfer. Governmental and International Non-governmental Organizations can go a long way to facilitate this exchange.

Corneal ulcers in a tertiary hospital in Africa.

PURPOSE: To study the clinical features of corneal ulcers in a tertiary hospital in Africa. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of the medical records of 82 consecutive corneal ulcer patients who presented to the eye clinic of Enugu State University of Science and Technology (ESUT) Teaching Hospital Parklane, Enugu, Nigeria, in 2008. Data entry and analysis was done using SPSS version 15.0. RESULTS: The 82 consecutive patients comprised 38 males (36.3%) and 44 females (53.7%). Fifty-five (71.4%) presented with visual acuity in the affected eye of less than 3/60. After treatment, the vision improved in 21 eyes (32.3% of the total), remained the same in 34 eyes (52.3%), and deteriorated in 4 eyes (6.2%); 6 eyes (9.2%) had to be eviscerated. Forty-three eyes (52.4%) had antecedent trauma: Only 5 patients (6.1%) presented to the hospital within 24 hours of trauma or onset of symptoms. Thirty-eight patients (47.6%) sought treatment from patent medicine dealers prior to coming to the hospital, while 16 (19.5%) admitted use of traditional eye medication. CONCLUSION: Trauma is a major risk factor for corneal ulcer in developing countries. Vision is often poor after treatment, making corneal ulcer a major cause of corneal blindness. Patients commonly seek help from the wrong source and only present to the hospital when these have failed.