ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Modular systems with stems are necessary for the stability of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), but controversy remains as to the best fixation method: cemented or hybrid (noncemented stem). The aim of this study was to assess the clinical, X-ray, life-quality and survival results obtained with each fixation method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period 2000-2013, rTKA was performed on 67 patients (29 cemented arthroplasty and 38 hybrid fixation). The average follow-up was 7 years (range 2-15). All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically using the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). A survival study was performed via Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: There were no differences between the cemented and hybrid fixation groups in the preoperative and postoperative AKSS clinical evaluation indices and the SF-36 health index. However, the WOMAC assessment scale did reveal statistically significant differences between the groups, with a global classification of 64.9 points weighted at 100 (SD 16.8) for cemented fixation versus 78.9 (SD 9.0) for hybrid fixation (p = 0.001). The corresponding values for stiffness were 61.6 (SD 12.9) and 80.5 (SD 14.7) (p = 0.001), and those for function were 61.3 (SD 19.4) and 78.1 (SD 10.5) (p = 0.001). No significant differences between the groups were recorded with respect to the pain score (p = 0.4) or the results of the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. CONCLUSION: Although the results were similar for the two groups, hybrid fixation tended to produce better results than cemented fixation. In view of the risk of further loosening, we prefer the more conservative approach, i.e. hybrid fixation. LEVEL EVIDENCE: Level III.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Bone Cements , Knee Joint/surgery , Knee Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnosis , Radiography , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: frostbite is defined as the damage sustained by tissues while subject to temperatures below their freezing point. The severity of tissue damage is variable, but frequently can result in amputation. Early surgical debridement is contraindicated in almost all patients because it can take weeks for definitive demarcation of non-viable tissues to occur. Bone scan is indicted in the evaluation of frostbite injuries and helps to establish the prognosis early. CLINICAL CASE: a 42 year old man suffered frostbite injury in the fingers and toes after more than 24 hours at 8,000 meters of altitude. The patient was treated with anticoagulant therapy and topical cures for six weeks. During this period, we performed two consecutive bone scan studies showing no changes in the level of vascularization. However, clinical improvement was important, devitalized tissues delimited to the level marked by the bone scan study, so amputation was performed. CONCLUSION: Because the bone scan remained invariable, we believe that could help us to determine the amputation level early without delaying surgery.
Antecedentes: la congelación es el daño sufrido por los tejidos cuando se someten a temperaturas inferiores a su punto de congelación. La gravedad de las lesiones es variable, pero con frecuencia termina en amputación. El desbridamiento quirúrgico temprano está contraindicado en la mayoría de los casos porque la demarcación de los tejidos viables tarda en producirse. La gammagrafía ósea está indicada para la evaluación de las lesiones por congelación y ayuda a establecer el pronóstico temprano. Caso clínico: paciente varón de 42 años, con lesiones por congelación en los dedos de las manos y los pies, tras permanecer más de 24 horas a 8,000 metros de altitud. Durante seis semanas se administró tratamiento anticoagulante y se realizaron curas tópicas. En este periodo se practicaron dos estudios gammagráficos consecutivos, sin apreciarse cambios en la vascularización. Sin embargo, la mejoría clínica fue importante, delimitándose el tejido desvitalizado hasta el nivel marcado por el estudio gammagráfico, por lo que se realizó la amputación. Conclusión: puesto que la gammagrafía ósea permaneció invariable, consideramos que puede ayudar a determinar de forma temprana el nivel de amputación, sin tener que demorar la cirugía.
