Influence of Diclofenac Potassium versus Prednisolone on Postendodontic Pain and Pulpal Interleukin-8 Expression in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis Cases: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial.

AIM: This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial investigated the impact of diclofenac potassium, prednisolone, and placebo as oral premedication on postendodontic pain and pulpal interleukin (IL)-8 expression in patients with irreversible pulpitis. METHODS: Thirty-six patients undergoing conventional endodontic treatment were assigned into one of 3 groups (n = 12). Pulpal blood samples were taken after access cavity preparation and stored until they were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent asssay for quantification of IL-8. Postendodontic pain was scored using the visual analogue scale. Outcome data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman's, Dunn's, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests and Spearman's correlation coefficient. The significance level (α) was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Apart from preoperative pain scores, all groups had similar baseline characteristics (P > .05). Immediate postendodontic pain scores had a significant difference between all groups (P < .05) where placebo group showed the highest score. There was no significant difference between all groups at 6 and 12 hours postoperatively (P > .05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the incidence of postendodontic pain and in mean IL-8 levels between the 3 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The only impact the premedications had was on the immediate postendodontic pain intensity, and they had no influence on the later time points, incidence of postendodontic pain or pulpal IL-8 levels.

Complete Breast Cancer Detection and Monitoring System by Using Microwave Textile Based Antenna Sensors.

This paper presents the development of a new complete wearable system for detecting breast tumors based on fully textile antenna-based sensors. The proposed sensor is compact and fully made of textiles so that it fits conformably and comfortably on the breasts with dimensions of 24 × 45 × 0.17 mm3 on a cotton substrate. The proposed antenna sensor is fed with a coplanar waveguide feed for easy integration with other systems. It realizes impedance bandwidth from 1.6 GHz up to 10 GHz at |S11| ≤ -6 dB (VSWR ≤ 3) and from 1.8 to 2.4 GHz and from 4 up to 10 GHz at |S11| ≤ -10 dB (VSWR ≤ 2). The proposed sensor acquires a low specific absorption rate (SAR) of 0.55 W/kg and 0.25 W/kg at 1g and 10 g, respectively, at 25 dBm power level over the operating band. Furthermore, the proposed system utilizes machine-learning algorithms (MLA) to differentiate between malignant tumor and benign breast tissues. Simulation examples have been recorded to verify and validate machine-learning algorithms in detecting tumors at different sizes of 10 mm and 20 mm, respectively. The classification accuracy reached 100% on the tested dataset when considering |S21| parameter features. The proposed system is vision as a "Smart Bra" that is capable of providing an easy interface for women who require continuous breast monitoring in the comfort of their homes.

Inferior alveolar nerve block success of 2% mepivacaine versus 4% articaine in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars: A randomized double-blind single-centre clinical trial.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) success of 2% mepivacaine (Scandonest 2%, Septodont, France) and 4% articaine (Septanest 4%, Septodont) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP) in mandibular molars during access cavity preparation and instrumentation. METHODOLOGY: Three hundred and thirty patients with moderate-to-severe pain in mandibular molars with SIP randomly received either 3.6 ml 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:100 000 adrenalin or 3.4 ml 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100 000 adrenalin (n = 165). Intraoperative pain (IOP) intensity was assessed during access cavity preparation and canal instrumentation using 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Overall success was considered if the patient felt no-to-mild pain without the need for supplemental anaesthesia throughout treatment; the incidence of need for supplemental anaesthesia was also recorded. Data were statistically analysed using Mann-Whitney U- and Chi-squared (χ2 ) tests. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of anaesthetic failure were calculated. The effect of pre-disposing factors on outcome variables was assessed using multivariable regression analyses. None of the participants reported any adverse effects. RESULTS: Baseline variables were balanced between groups (p > .05). The IOP intensity during access cavity preparation and canal instrumentation was similar for both groups (p > .05). IOP intensity was associated with preoperative pain intensity and tooth type (p < .05). Overall anaesthetic success rate was 35.8% for mepivacaine and 41.2% for articaine (p > .05) with a relative risk of failure [95% CI] 1.09 [0.92, 1.30]. The need for supplemental anaesthesia occurred 43.6% and 38.2% with mepivacaine and articaine respectively (p > .05; RR [95% CI]: 1.14 [0.88, 1.48]). Preoperative pain level and age were associated with the need for supplemental anaesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: 2% mepivacaine and 4% articaine demonstrate similar IANB success rates for mandibular molars with SIP. Intraoperative pain experience during endodontic treatment can be associated with preoperative pain, tooth type and age.