[Still's syndrome-similarities and differences between the juvenile and adult forms]. / Morbus Still ­ Ähnlichkeiten und Differenzen zwischen juveniler und adulter Form.

Still's syndrome includes systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and the adult form of Still's disease (adult-onset Still's disease, AOSD). Except for age, there are many similarities between sJIA and AOSD. A biphasic disease model is currently put forth. At disease onset, autoinflammation predominates, which is caused by dysregulation of the innate immune system. Later on, the disease can progress to a chronic-articular form, which is predominantly mediated by the adaptive immune system and is consequently due to autoimmunity. The "window-of-opportunity" hypothesis is based on this biphasic model and supports the assumption that an early, targeted therapy with cytokine blockade can prevent disease progression to chronic destructive arthritis. Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a serious complication of the so-called cytokine storm during the systemic phase of the disease. Clinically, there are many similarities between sJIA and AOSD. Recurrent fever, a fleeting, salmon-colored rash, and arthralgia/arthritis are common signs and symptoms of both sJIA and AOSD. The few differences are mainly related to the therapies and their side effects in children versus adults. In addition, the contribution of genetics to pathogenesis is more pronounced in sJIA compared to AOSD, but there are also smooth transitions in this respect and both diseases are heavily influenced by exogenous factors such as microbial triggers. Future research aspects could include additional investigation of these triggers such as viruses, bacteria, or dysbiosis of the human microbiome.

Long-term surveillance of biologic therapies in systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis: data from the German BIKER registry.

OBJECTIVE: Using data from the German Biologics JIA Registry (BIKER), long-term safety of biologics for systemic-onset JIA with regard to adverse events of special interest was assessed. METHODS: Safety assessments were based on adverse event reports after first dose through 90 days after last dose. Rates of adverse event, serious adverse event and 25 predefined adverse events of special interest were analysed. Incidence rates were compared for each biologic against all other biologics combined applying a mixed-effect Poisson model. RESULTS: Of 260 systemic-onset JIA patients in this analysis, 151 patients received etanercept, 109 tocilizumab, 71 anakinra and 51 canakinumab. Patients with etanercept had higher clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10 scores, active joint counts and steroid use at therapy start. Serious adverse events were reported with higher frequency in patients receiving canakinumab [20/100 patient years (PY)] and tocilizumab (21/100 PY). Cytopenia and hepatic events occurred with a higher frequency with tocilizumab and canakinumab. Medically important infections were seen more often in patients with IL-6 or IL-1 inhibition. Macrophage activation syndrome occurred in all cohorts with a higher frequency in patients with canakinumab (3.2/100 PY) and tocilizumab (2.5/100 PY) vs anakinra (0.83/100 PY) and etanercept (0.5/100 PY). After adjustment only an elevated risk for infections in anakinra-treated patients remained significant. Three definite malignancies were reported in patients ever exposed to biologics. Two deaths occurred in patients treated with etanercept. CONCLUSION: Surveillance of pharmacotherapy as provided by BIKER is an import approach especially for patients on long-term treatment. Overall, tolerance was acceptable. Differences between several biologics were noted and should be considered in daily patient care.

The transcription factor CREM drives an inflammatory phenotype of T cells in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory effector T cells trigger inflammation despite increased numbers of Treg cells in the synovial joint of patients suffering from juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The cAMP response element (CREM)α is known to play a major role in regulation of T cells in SLE, colitis, and EAE. However, its role in regulation of effector T cells within the inflammatory joint is unknown. METHODS: CREM expression was analyzed in synovial fluid cells from oligoarticular JIA patients by flow cytometry. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were incubated with synovial fluid and analyzed in the presence and absence of CREM using siRNA experiments for T cell phenotypes. To validate the role of CREM in vivo, ovalbumin-induced T cell dependent arthritis experiments were performed. RESULTS: CREM is highly expressed in synovial fluid T cells and its expression can be induced by treating healthy control PBMCs with synovial fluid. Specifically, CREM is more abundant in CD161+ subsets, than CD161- subsets, of T cells and contributes to cytokine expression by these cells. Finally, development of ovalbumin-induced experimental arthritis is ameliorated in mice with adoptively transferred CREM-/- T cells. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study reveals that beyond its role in SLE T cells CREM also drives an inflammatory phenotype of T cells in JIA.

Partial correction of neutrophil dysfunction by oral galactose therapy in glycogen storage disease type Ib.

Glycogen storage disease type Ib (GSD-Ib) is characterized by impaired glucose homeostasis, neutropenia and neutrophil dysfunction. Mass spectrometric glycomic profiling of GSD-Ib neutrophils showed severely truncated N-glycans, lacking galactose. Experiments indicated the hypoglycosylation of the electron transporting subunit of NADPH oxidase, which is crucial for the defense against bacterial infections. In phosphoglucomutase 1 (PGM1) deficiency, an inherited disorder with an enzymatic defect just one metabolic step ahead, hypogalactosylation can be successfully treated by dietary galactose. We hypothesized the same pathomechanism in GSD-Ib and started a therapeutic trial with oral galactose and uridine. The aim was to improve neutrophil dysfunction through the correction of hypoglycosylation in neutrophils. The GSD-Ib patient was treated for 29weeks. Monitoring included glycomics analysis of the patient's neutrophils and neutrophil function tests including respiratory burst activity, phagocytosis and migration. Although no substantial restoration of neutrophil glycosylation was found, there was partial improvement of respiratory burst activity.

The majority of newly diagnosed patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis reach an inactive disease state within the first year of specialised care: data from a German inception cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the disease characteristics of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) included in an inception cohort, to analyse how many patients from each JIA category reach an inactive disease state within the first year of specialised care and to determine predictors for attaining inactive disease. METHODS: Patients with JIA were enrolled in this study at 11 large German paediatric rheumatology units within the first 12 months after diagnosis. Laboratory and clinical parameters such as JIA core criteria and data on the medication used were collected every 3 months. Non-parametric statistical testing was performed for the comparison of the JIA core criteria at follow-up. Generalised linear models were used to analyse differences in the rates at which inactive disease was reached and to determine potential predictors. RESULTS: Of the 695 patients with JIA included in this analysis, approximately 75% experienced a period of inactive disease under treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and systemic steroids in most cases with systemic-onset JIA or polyarthritis at least once during the first 12 months in ICON. Significant improvements were observed in all JIA core criteria, in disease activity and in functional status from baseline to the 12-month follow-up. Younger age at onset, a shorter duration between symptom onset and diagnosis and a positive antinuclear antibody status increased the probability of attaining an inactive disease state. CONCLUSIONS: The 12-month outcome of JIA was good under real-life conditions, with half of the patients having attained inactive disease with contemporary treatments. Since a short duration between symptom onset and diagnosis was correlated to a period of inactive disease, children suspected of having JIA should be transferred to specialised care as soon as possible.

Uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common systemic disease causing uveitis in childhood, with a prevalence of 10 per 100 000 persons. JIA often takes a severe inflammatory course, and its complications often endanger vision. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a selective literature search up to 18 August 2014 and on the current interdisciplinary S2k guideline on the diagnostic evaluation and anti-inflammatory treatment of juvenile idiopathic uveitis. RESULTS: Uveitis arises in roughly 1 in 10 patients with JIA. Regular eye check-ups should be performed starting as soon as JIA is diagnosed. 75-80% of patients are girls; antinuclear antibodies are found in 70-90%. The risk to vision is higher if JIA begins in the preschool years. As for treatment, only a single, small-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a small number of prospective trials have been published to date. Topical corticosteroids should be given as the initial treatment. Systemic immunosuppression is needed if irritation persists despite topical corticosteroids, if new complications arise, or if the topical steroids have to be given in excessively high doses or have unacceptable side effects. If the therapeutic effect remains inadequate, conventional and biological immune modulators can be given as add-on (escalation) therapy. Treatment lowers the risk of uveitis and its complications and thereby improves the prognosis for good visual function. CONCLUSION: Severely affected patients should be treated in competence centers to optimize their long-term outcome. Multidisciplinary, individualized treatment is needed because of the chronic course of active inflammation and the ensuing high risk of complications that can endanger vision. Future improvements in therapy will be aided by prospective, population-based registries and by basic research on biomarkers for the prediction of disease onset, prognosis, tissue damage, and therapeutic response.

S100A12 and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products levels during human severe sepsis.

S100A12 is highly expressed, and serum levels correlate with individual disease activity in patients with inflammatory diseases. We here sought to determine the extent of S100A12 release and its soluble high-affinity receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) in patients with severe sepsis stratified to the three most common infectious sources (lungs, abdomen, and urinary tract) and to determine S100A12 and sRAGE concentrations at the site of infection during peritonitis. Two patient populations were studied: (a) 51 patients with sepsis due to (i) peritonitis (n = 12), (ii) pneumonia (n = 29), or (iii) urinary tract infection (n = 10); and (b) 17 patients with peritonitis. In addition, eight healthy humans were studied after intravenous injection of lipopolysaccharide (4 ng/kg). Compared with healthy volunteers, patients with severe sepsis displayed increased circulating S100A12 concentrations at day 0 (591.2 ± 101.0 vs. 106.2 ± 15.6 ng/mL [control subjects], P < 0.0001) and at day 3 (637.2 ± 111.2 vs. 106.2 ± 15.6 ng/mL [control subjects], P < 0.0001). All three severe sepsis subgroups had elevated serum S100A12 concentrations at both time points (sepsis due to [i] peritonitis [393.5 ± 89.9 at day 0 and 337.9 ± 97.2 at day 3 vs. 106.2 ± 15.6 ng/mL, control subjects, P < 0.005 and P < 0.05, respectively]; [ii] pneumonia [716.9 ± 167.0 at day 0 and 787.5 ± 164.7 at day 3 vs. 106.2 ± 15.6 ng/mL, control subjects, both P < 0.0001]; and [iii] urinary tract infection [464.2 ± 115.6 at day 0 and 545.6 ± 254.9 at day 3 vs. 106.2 ± 15.6 ng/mL, control subjects, P < 0.0001 and P < 0.05, respectively]). Remarkably, patients with sepsis due to pneumonia had the highest S100A12 levels (716.9 ± 167.0 and 787.5 ± 164.7 ng/mL at days 0 and 3, respectively). S100A12 levels were not correlated to either Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (r = -0.185, P = 0.19) or Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment scores (r = -0.194, P = 0.17). Intravenous lipopolysaccharide injection in healthy humans elevated systemic S100A12 levels (peak levels at 3 h of 59.6 ± 22.0 vs. 12.4 ± 3.6 ng/mL; t = 0 h, P < 0.005). In contrast to S100A12, sRAGE concentrations did not change during severe sepsis or human endotoxemia. During peritonitis, S100A12 concentrations in abdominal fluid (12945.8 ± 4142.1 ng/mL) were more than 100-fold higher than in concurrently obtained plasma (121.2 ± 80.4 ng/mL, P < 0.0005), whereas sRAGE levels in abdominal fluid (148.8 ± 36.0 pg/mL) were lower than those in plasma (648.7 ± 145.6 pg/mL, P < 0.005) and did not increase. In conclusion, in severe sepsis, S100A12 is released systemically irrespective of the primary source of infection. During abdominal sepsis, S100A12 release likely predominantly occurs at the site of infection. Concentrations of its high-affinity sRAGE do not change during infection or human endotoxemia.