Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Radiol ; 28(11): 4766-4774, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29761359

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether electronic cleansing (EC) of tagged residue and different computed tomography (CT) windows influence the size of colorectal polyps in CT colonography (CTC). METHODS: A database of 894 colonoscopy-validated CTC datasets of a low-prevalence cohort was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with polyps ≥6 mm that were entirely submerged in tagged residue. Ten radiologists independently measured the largest diameter of each polyp, two-dimensionally, before and after EC in colon, bone, and soft-tissue-windows, in randomised order. Differences in size and polyp count before and after EC were calculated for size categories ≥6 mm and ≥10 mm. Statistical testing involved 95% confidence interval, intraclass correlation and mixed-model ANOVA. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with 48 polyps were included. Mean polyp size before EC was 9.8 mm in colon, 9.9 mm in bone and 8.2 mm in soft-tissue windows. After EC, the mean polyp size decreased significantly to 9.4 mm in colon, 9.1 mm in bone and 7.1 mm in soft-tissue windows. Compared to unsubtracted colon windows, EC, performed in colon, bone and soft-tissue windows, led to a shift of 6 (12,5%), 10 (20.8%) and 25 (52.1%) polyps ≥6 mm into the next smaller size category, thus affecting patient risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: EC and narrow CT windows significantly reduce the size of polyps submerged in tagged residue. Polyp measurements should be performed in unsubtracted colon windows. KEY POINTS: • EC significantly reduces the size of polyps submerged in tagged residue. • Abdominal CT-window settings significantly underestimate 2D sizes of submerged polyps. • Size reduction in EC is significantly greater in narrow than wide windows. • Underestimation of polyp size due to EC may lead to inadequate treatment. • Polyp measurements should be performed in unsubtracted images using a colon window.


Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Colonography, Computed Tomographic/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Aged , Algorithms , Analysis of Variance , Colonography, Computed Tomographic/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reference Standards , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 14(6): 711-22, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24552125

ABSTRACT

Recently, molecular imaging, using various techniques, has been assessed for breast imaging. Molecular imaging aims to quantify and visualize biological, physiological, and pathological processes at the cellular and molecular levels to further elucidate the development and progression of breast cancer and the response to treatment. Molecular imaging enables the depiction of tumor morphology, as well as the assessment of functional and metabolic processes involved in cancer development at different levels. To date, molecular imaging techniques comprise both nuclear medicine and radiological techniques. This review aims to summarize the current and emerging functional and metabolic techniques for the molecular imaging of breast tumors.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Carcinoma/chemistry , Molecular Imaging/methods , Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms/blood supply , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma/blood supply , Carcinoma/pathology , Estradiol/analogs & derivatives , Female , Fluorine Radioisotopes , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Mammography/methods , Multimodal Imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography , Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Radiopharmaceuticals , Sensitivity and Specificity , Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...