Pharmacodynamic effects of orally administered dexlipotam on endothelial function in type 2-diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetic endotheliopathy is the result of hyperglycemia and the production of oxygen-free radicals. In vitro and in vivo data have shown beneficial effects of dexlipotam (DEX), a tromethamine salt of R(+)-alpha-lipoic acid, on oxidative stress in hyperglycemic states, but no data are available on the effects of this agent on endothelial function. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the impact of DEX on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes (DM2) and to estimate the safety and tolerability of DEX. MATERIAL AND METHODS: DEX 960 mg and DEX 1,920 mg were investigated in DM2 patients over a period of 4 weeks using a randomized, placebo- (PLA) controlled, double-blinded study with 3 parallel groups. The marker of arterial function after 4-week therapy with DEX was the maximum percentage change versus baseline in the flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery (FMD) after reperfusion. RESULTS: A total of 114 diabetic patients were randomized to the three study groups. DEX was safe and well tolerated. Dyspepsia appeared to be the most relevant side effect of DEX treatment. Systolic (p = 0.078) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.059) tended to be lower in patients treated with DEX at a dose of 1,920 mg. There were no significant differences in FMD between the placebo- and the DEX-treated groups. In patients with poorer glucose control (HbA1c > 6.5% Hb), FMD increased significantly after 4-week treatment with DEX: PLA -1.51 +/- 2.98%, DEX 960 mg +1.22 +/- 3.22, p = 0.027, DEX 1,920 mg +1.47 +/- 3.78, p= 0.012. The magnitude of the mean change compared to placebo was 2.73% (DEX 920) and 2.98% (DEX 1,920) in patients with HbAlc > 7.5% Hb (DEX 960, p = 0.007, DEX 1,920, p = 0.032). The effects of treatment were usually statistically significant in subgroups with more severe vascular stress (longer duration of disease, pretreatment history, higher LDL-C, higher blood pressure). CONCLUSION: DEX therapy appears to reduce endothelial dysfunction in DM2, especially in men with long history of DM2 and having poor glucose control. These findings will be useful in patient selection in future prospective clinical trials with drugs to treat vascular stress.

Pioglitazone decreases carotid intima-media thickness independently of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a controlled randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) is a strong predictor of myocardial infarction and stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the effects of pioglitazone-based therapy (45 mg/d) and glimepiride-based treatment (2.7+/-1.6 mg/d) for 12 and 24 weeks on metabolic control (HbA1c), insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment), and carotid IMT (B-mode ultrasonography) in a randomized controlled study in 173 orally treated patients with type 2 diabetes (66 women, 107 men; mean+/-SD age, 62.6+/-7.9 years; body mass index, 31.8+/-4.6 kg/m2; HbA1c, 7.5+/-0.9%). Treatment was generally well tolerated in both groups. Despite similar improvements in metabolic control (HbA1c) after 24 weeks (-0.8+/-0.9% [pioglitazone] versus -0.6+/-0.8% [glimepiride]; P=NS), carotid IMT was reduced only in the pioglitazone group after 12 weeks (-0.033+/-0.052 versus -0.002+/-0.047 mm [glimepiride]; P<0.01 between groups) and 24 weeks (-0.054+/-0.059 versus -0.011+/-0.058 mm [glimepiride]; P<0.005 between groups). Insulin resistance was also improved only in the pioglitazone group (homeostasis model assessment, -2.2+/-3.4 versus -0.3+/-3.3; P<0.0001 between groups). Reduction of IMT correlated with improvement in insulin resistance (r=0.29, P<0.0005) and was independent of improvement in glycemic control (r=0.03, P=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: We found a substantial regression of carotid IMT, independent of improved glycemic control, after 12 and 24 weeks of pioglitazone treatment. This finding may have important prognostic implications for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Effects of pioglitazone in nondiabetic patients with arterial hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Hypertension is often associated with insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and obesity, which indicate a prediabetic state and increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Pioglitazone treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes reduces insulin resistance and improves lipid profiles. The present double-blind placebo-controlled study is the first study to report effects of pioglitazone in non-diabetic patients with arterial hypertension. Following a one week run-in, 60 patients were randomized to receive either pioglitazone (45 mg/day) or placebo for 16 weeks. Insulin sensitivity (M-value) increased by 1.2 +/- 1.7 mg/min/kg with pioglitazone compared with 0.4 +/- 1.4 mg/min/kg (P = 0.022) with placebo. HOMA index was decreased (-22.5 +/- 45.8) by pioglitazone but not by placebo (+0.8 +/- 26.5; P < 0.001). Decreases in fasting insulin and glucose were significantly (P = 0.002 and P = 0.004, respectively) greater with pioglitazone than placebo. Body weight did not change significantly with either treatment. HDL-cholesterol was increased and apolipoprotein B was decreased to a significantly greater extent with pioglitazone. There was a significantly (P = 0.016) greater decrease from baseline in diastolic blood pressure with pioglitazone. These changes would suggest improved glucose metabolism and a possible reduction in risk of cardiovascular disease with pioglitazone treatment of non-diabetic patients with arterial hypertension.