Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
Trop Med Infect Dis ; 9(9)2024 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39330882

ABSTRACT

Infective endocarditis (IE) associated with implantable cardiac devices (ICD) is a serious disease with high mortality rates. The increased number of ICD implants has led to increased ICD infection rates. The aim of this study was to characterize clinical, laboratory profiles and the prognosis of cardiac-device-related endocarditis (CDIE), as well as to identify predictors of in-hospital death. A total of 274 patients with IE were included in a prospective cohort (2007-2019). From these, 82 patients (30%) had CDIE (46 pacemakers, 23 cardioverter defibrillators, and 13 cardiac resynchronization therapy devices). Predisposed conditions; clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters; etiologic agents; and in-hospital outcomes were evaluated. The mean age was 55.8 ± 16.4 years, where 64.6% were male. Among the clinical manifestations at diagnosis, the most prevalent were heart failure (67.9%), fever (60.5%), anorexia/hyporexia (44.4%), and heart murmur (37.5%). The median serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level at diagnosis was 63 mg/L (interquartile range [IQR] 20-161). Etiological agents were identified through positive blood cultures in 55% of cases. The main etiologic agents were negative-coagulase staphylococci (19.5%) and Staphylococcus aureus (18.3%). Vegetation was identified in 74 patients (90.1%). In-hospital mortality was 28%. CRP concentrations at diagnosis were identified as markers of disease severity (odds ratio [OR] 1.006; 95%CI 1.001-1.011; p = 0.016), and the worsening of heart failure was associated with unfavorable outcomes (OR 3.105; 95%CI 1.397-6.902; p = 0.005). Unlike what is traditionally accepted, CDIE does not have a better prognosis.

2.
Int J Cardiol ; 416: 132510, 2024 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39222885

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite a large body of evidence supporting the use of intravascular imaging (IVI) to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), concerns exist about its universal recommendation. The selective use of IVI to guide PCI of complex lesions and patients is perceived as a rational approach. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane were systematically searched for RCTs that compared IVI-guided PCI with angiography-guided PCI in high-risk patients and complex coronary anatomies. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). A random-effects model was used to calculate the risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 15 RCTs with 14,109 patients were included and followed for a weighted mean duration of 15.8 months. IVI-guided PCI was associated with a decrease in the risk of MACE (RR: 0.65; 95 % CI: 0.56-0.77; p < 0.01), target vessel failure (TVF) (RR: 0.66; 95 % CI: 0.52-0.84; p < 0.01), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.71; 95 % CI: 0.55-0.91; p < 0.01), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.47; 95 % CI: 0.34-0.65; p < 0.01), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.55; 95 % CI: 0.38-0.79; p < 0.01), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.81; 95 % CI: 0.67-0.98; p = 0.03), and repeated revascularizations (RR: 0.70; 95 % CI: 0.58-0.85; p < 0.01) compared with angiography. There was no significant difference in procedure-related complications (RR: 1.03; 95 % CI: 0.75-1.42; p = 0.84) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with angiographic guidance alone, IVI-guided PCI of complex lesions and high-risk patients significantly reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, MACE, TVF, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization.


Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Humans , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/adverse effects , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/adverse effects , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods
3.
Trop Med Infect Dis ; 9(6)2024 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38922044

ABSTRACT

Neurological complications are frequent during the active course of infective endocarditis (IE), and they are associated with high in-hospital mortality rates. However, limited data exist on the prognostic value of these complications for late outcomes. This study aimed to assess the long-term impact of neurological complications in patients surviving an IE episode. A total of 263 consecutive IE patients admitted to a tertiary care center between 2007 and 2022 were prospectively included. Neurological complications at admission included transient ischemic attack (TIA), ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, intracerebral abscess, and meningitis. The primary outcome was a composite of overall mortality or heart valve surgery. Of the patients, 34.2% died in the hospital, leaving 173 survivors for long-term follow-up. Over a median of 3.5 years, 29 patients died, and 13 (9%) underwent cardiac surgery, resulting in an overall adverse event rate of 30%. Neurological complications independently predicted long-term adverse outcomes (hazard ratio (HR) 2.237; 95% CI 1.006-4.976), after adjusting for age, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and heart failure (HF) development. In an IE patient cohort, neurological complications at admission, which is a complication directly related to the IE process, were independent predictors of long-term outcomes.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL