Children at risk of domestic accidents when are locked up at home: the other side of COVID-19 outbreak lockdown.

BACKGROUND: We proposed to analyze thoroughly the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown (CL) in changes of profiles and in trend of the domestic accidents (DAs) in children. METHODS: This was a single experience, cross-sectional study conducted at the emergency department (ED) of III trauma center. We enrolled children under 18 years admitted to ED with a diagnosis of DAs comparing the CL period from 10th March 2020 to 4th May 2020 with the same period of the previous year,10th March 2019 to 4th May 2019. RESULTS: In CL period, the cumulative incidence of ED visits for DAs increased from 86.88 to 272.13 per 1,000 children and the cumulative incidence of hospitalizations for DAs increased from 409.72 to 534.48 per 1,000 children. We reported in CL a decrease in the severity of ED presentation assessed by proxy measures: the level of priority ED visits reduced by 67% in CL period (OR: 0.33; 95%CI 0.22-0.48; p < 0.001); the likelihood of delayed time of presentation to ED increased by 65% in case of domestic injuries occurring in CL period (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.17-2.34; p = 0.004); the odds of transfer from other hospital decreased by 78% in CL (OR: 0.15-0.33; p < 0.001). Children were more at risk of poisoning (OR:3.35-106.11; p = 0.001), of body foreign ingestion (OR: 1.83-14.39; p = 0.002) and less at risk of animal bite trauma (OR:0.05-0.35; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although the need to stay home has made a decisive breakthrough on the spread of COVID-19, the experience from this study underlines how this preventive measure has also had a downside in term of increased cumulative incidence of ED visits and of hospitalizations for DA.

Children With a Soft Scalp Hematoma Presenting to the Emergency Department More Than 24 Hours After a Head Injury.

OBJECTIVES: The soft scalp hematoma is one of the clinical markers used as a predictor for the presence of intracranial injury in children with a head trauma. We evaluated the significance of time presentation in the management of these patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of children and adolescents aged 0 to <18 years by comparing the clinical, radiological, and epidemiological features in those presenting within 24 hours with those presenting greater than 24 hours after a head injury. RESULTS: We identified 188 and 98 patients with early presentation and late presentation, respectively. The percentage of children aged 0 to <6 months was lower in those with late presentation (6.12%) than those with early presentation (20.21%) with a significant difference (P < .001). Likewise, the percentage of children aged ≥24 months was lower in children with late presentation (7.14%) than those with early presentation (34.04%) with a significant difference (P < .001). The severe mechanism rate was more elevated in early presentation (38.83%) with a significant difference (-14.34%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -25.34% to -3.34%; P = .015). The symptom rate resulted higher in early presentation (14.36%) with a significant difference (-11.30%; 95% CI, -17.36% to 5.22%; P = .003). The parietal scalp hematoma occurred mostly in children with late presentation (85.71%) with a significant difference (19.76%; 95% CI, 10.07% to 29.45%; P < .001). The occipital scalp hematoma rate was higher in early presentation with a significant difference (-17.50%; 95% CI, -22.99% to -12.12%; P < .001). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of different types of intracranial injury, and the only 5 patients needing a neurosurgical intervention were exclusively children with an early presentation. CONCLUSION: Although children with soft scalp hematoma presenting to the emergency department greater than 24 hours after a head injury may have pathological findings on computed tomography, all of them had a good short- and long-term outcomes, and no neurological deterioration aroused the medical attention on follow-up. For this subset of patients that does not experience red flags (neurological symptoms, focal signs on examination, or severe injury mechanism), a wait-and-see approach might be more appropriate rather than neuroimaging.