Metabolic Benefit of Teleconsultation for Diabetes Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A French Observational Prospective Study.

Aim: To investigate the impact of teleconsultation on glycemic control in patients with diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: In this observational prospective study, the main outcome was the comparison of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) between patients with or without teleconsultation at 6-month follow-up. Results: From March 17 to May 31, 2020, 610 patients were included, 456 were followed-up using Teleconsultation présent (TC+) and 154 not using No Teleconsultation (TC-). Patients of TC+ Group were younger, 57 ± 17 versus 65 ± 15.5 years (p < 0.001), with a lower body mass index, 28 ± 6.2 kg/m2 versus 30 ± 5.8 kg/m2, compared to those of TC- Group (p < 0.001). HbA1c were comparable between the two groups: 7.35 ± 0.27% for TC+ versus 7.48 ± 0.22% for TC- Group. At 6-month follow-up, HbA1c was lower in TC+ versus TC- Group: 7.21 ± 0.15% versus 7.6 ± 0.18% (p = 0.004). Conclusion: Our findings point toward the feasibility and usefulness of teleconsultation for the follow-up of patients with diabetes in such exceptional circumstances.

Comparison of open versus minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have been developed for the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spinal metastases to reduce the morbidity associated with the operation. The purpose of our study was to compare the mean length of stay, change in pain levels, neurological symptoms, complications and survival after open versus MIS surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study based on a register of patients treated for vertebral metastases between January 2014 and October 2016. The collection included demographic data, cancer-related data, clinical data, the characteristics of the surgery, the length of stay, assessment of pain and the occurrence of death. These data were compared between open and MIS surgery groups. RESULTS: Out of 59 patients, 35 were treated with open surgery and 24 were treated with MIS surgery. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender and body mass index. Breast, kidney, prostate and lung cancers were the most frequent primary tumors. Prognostic and instability scores were comparable. Short- and medium-term pain assessment showed comparable results. Median survival was 208 days in the open surgery group and 224days in the MIS group (p=0.5299). CONCLUSION: MIS techniques aim to limit the surgical approach and allow a faster introduction of adjuvant treatments than after open surgery. Our study did not find any differences between open and MIS surgery in terms of pain, neurological evolution or survival time in patients treated for thoracolumbar spinal metastases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study.