ABSTRACT
In KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH), clinical case notes audits are conducted quarterly for compliance of approved acronym usage. Existing process involves the retrieval of mixed hardcopy and electronic case notes for referencing manually to the list of approved abbreviations by clinical coder. Through the use of process re-engineering and excel application, audit coverage can thus be expanded with reduction in human dependency and errors with significant resultant savings in time spent.
Subject(s)
Documentation , Electronics , Child , Humans , Female , Workflow , Engineering , Hospitals, PediatricABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The efficiency of postoperative handover of paediatric patients to the children's intensive care unit (CICU) varies according to institutions, clinical setup and workflow. Reorganisation of handover flow based on findings from observational studies has been shown to improve the efficiency of information transfer. This study aimed to evaluate a new handover process based on recipients' perceptions, focusing on completeness and comprehensiveness of verbal communication, and the usability of a situation, background, assessment and recommendation (SBAR) form. METHODS: This was a prospective interventional study conducted in the CICU of KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore. It comprised four phases: (1) evaluation of the current handover process through an audit and opinion survey; (2) development of a new handover process based on the opinion survey and hospital personnel feedback; (3) implementation; and (4) evaluation of the new handover process. The new handover process was based on a PETS (pre-handover, equipment handover, timeout and sign out) protocol with a 'single traffic communication' flow and a new SBAR handover document. It included relevant patient information, and the options 'not applicable' and 'none', to increase compliance and reduce ambiguity. RESULTS: Significantly more recipients indicated that the new SBAR form was the most important handover tool and provided more useful information. Recipients' perceptions indicated improvement in information sufficiency and clarity; reduction of omission errors; and fewer inconsistencies in patient descriptions in the new process. CONCLUSION: Dual customisation of the handover process, PETS protocol and SBAR form is necessary to meet the workflow and information demands of the receiving team.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Attitude of Health Personnel , Critical Care/methods , Intensive Care Units , Patient Handoff , Postoperative Care/methods , Child , Hospitals, Pediatric/organization & administration , Humans , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Nurses , Observational Studies as Topic , Pediatrics/methods , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Singapore , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
The advantages of video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in children have led to its increased usage over the years. VATS, however, requires an efficient technique for one lung ventilation. Today, there is an increasing interest in developing the technique for lung isolation to meet the anatomic and physiologic variations in infants and children. This article aims to provide an updated and comprehensive review on one-lung ventilation strategies for infants and children undergoing VATS. Search of terms such as 'One lung ventilation for infants and children', 'Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery for infants and children', and 'Physiologic changes during one lung ventilation for infants and children' were used. The search mechanics and engines for this review included the following: Kandang Kerbau Hospital (KKH) eLibrary, PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. During the search the author focused on significant current and pilot randomized control trials, case reports, review articles, and editorials. Critical decision making on what device to use based on the age, weight, and pathology of the patient; and how to use it for lung isolation are discussed in this article. Furthermore, additional information regarding the advantages, limitations, techniques of insertion and maintenance of each device for one lung ventilation in infants and children were the highlights in this article.
