Development and Effect Evaluation of an Action-Oriented Interdisciplinary Weaning Protocol for Cuffed Tracheostomy Tubes in Patients with Acquired Brain Injury.

The objective was to develop an interdisciplinary weaning protocol (IWP) for patients with tracheostomy tubes due to acquired brain injury, and to effect evaluate implementation of the IWP on decannulation rates and weaning duration. An expert panel completed a literature review in 2018 to identify essential criteria in the weaning process. Based on consensus and availability in clinical practice, criteria for guiding the weaning process were included in the protocol. Using the IWP, dysphagia is graded as either severe, moderate, or mild. The weaning process is guided through a protocol which specified the daily duration of cuff deflation until decannulation, along with recommendations for treatment and rehabilitation interventions. Data from 337 patient records (161 before and 176 after implementation) were included for effect evaluation. Decannulation rate during hospitalization was unchanged at 91% vs. 90% before and after implementation (decannulation rate at 60 days was 68% vs. 74%). After implementation, the weaning duration had decreased compared to before implementation, hazard ratio 1.309 (95%CI: 1.013; 1.693), without any increased risk of tube-reinsertion or pneumonia. Furthermore, a tendency toward decreased length of stay was seen with median 102 days (IQR: 73-138) and median 90 days (IQR: 58-119) (p = 0.061) before and after implementation, respectively. Scientific debate on weaning protocols for tracheostomy tubes are encouraged.

Subacute prognosis of oral nutrition (SPOON): Development of a multivariable prognostic model for complete oral intake in tube-fed subjects with acquired brain injury.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Enteral feeding is very common following an acquired brain injury. However, no prognostic models for oral food intake have been developed for subacute rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model and online tool, coined "subacute prognosis of oral nutrition" (SPOON), for complete oral intake in tube-fed subjects with acquired brain injury. METHODS: The model was developed using routinely gathered clinical data from a cohort of 1233 adult patients who were tube-fed at admission for sub-acute inpatient rehabilitation. Candidate predictors were included based on scientific evidence and their availability in the medical records within the first days following admission. The outcome was time until achieving complete oral food intake without any tube-feeding supplements. Time until complete oral intake was analyzed by discrete time-to-event analysis with logit-link and presented as daily odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The following predictors of complete oral intake were included in the model: age, diagnosis, cuffed tracheostomy tube, days from injury to admission for rehabilitation, and the Early Functional Abilities (EFA) sum score. Multiple adjusted analyses were performed stratified by cuffed tracheostomy tube status. Some of the strongest predictors of complete oral intake were age 18-40 years, OR 1.99 (95%CI: 1.53; 2.59); 0-2 weeks since injury, OR 3.75 (95%CI: 2.72; 5.16); and EFA 61-100 (slight/no disturbance in function), OR 5.81 (95%CI: 4.47; 7.55). The online prognostic tool SPOON was evaluated in a usability study. Based on feedback from clinicians, the tool was further refined to enable extraction of data for prediction directly from medical records. CONCLUSIONS: The objective of SPOON is to complement the planning of rehabilitation initiatives and inform discussions to determine if a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube should be inserted. SPOON is being implemented locally, but external validation based on appropriate data modeling is warranted before further clinical implementation.

Measuring mealtime performance in older adults with suspected oropharyngeal dysphagia: an updated systematic review of psychometric properties.

PURPOSE: To update a previous review of psychometric properties of performance-based outcome measurement instruments (PerFOMs) for task performance in the context of meal activity of older adults (≥65 years) with suspected oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. Studies on PerFOMs that covers items reflecting skills in the pre-oral, oral, and pharyngeal stages of ingestion during meals were included. Two review authors independently screened, extracted, and evaluated the methodological rigour and quality of the reported psychometric properties in the included studies using the guidelines of the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). RESULTS: Twenty-three articles featuring nine original PerFOMs and five translated versions were included. PerFOM development and content validity were rated with inadequate or doubtful methodological quality across all studies. The quality of the evidence across the additional psychometric properties of the PerFOMs was very low for two, ranged from very low to moderate for six, and from very low to high for five. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence of the psychometric properties of available PerFOMs for measuring task performance during meals in older adults with OD, and further validation is warranted.Implication for rehabilitationAssessing the mealtime performance of older adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) provides important information.Performance-based outcome measurement instruments (PerFOMs) need to be valid and reliable.Clinicians need to be careful when choosing PerFOMs to assess the mealtime performance of older adults with OD as there is insufficient evidence on the quality of available instruments.Established guidelines and standards should be used when developing and investigating psychometric properties of PerFOMs assessing mealtime performance of older adults with OD.

Regression-based prognostic models for functional independence after postacute brain injury rehabilitation are not transportable: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To identify and summarize validated multivariable prognostic models for the Functional Independence Measure® (FIM®) at discharge from post-acute inpatient rehabilitation in adults with acquired brain injury (ABI). METHODS: This review was conducted based on the recommendations of the Cochrane Prognosis Methods Group and adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Three databases were systematically searched in May 2021 and updated in April 2022. Main inclusion criteria were: a) adult patients with ABI, b) validated multivariable prognostic model, c) time of prognostication within 1-week of admission to post-acute rehabilitation, and d) outcome was the FIM® at discharge from post-acute rehabilitation. RESULTS: The search yielded 3,169 unique articles. Three articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria, accounting for n = 6 internally and n = 2 externally validated prognostic models. Discrimination was estimated as an area under the curve between 0.76 and 0.89. Calibration was deemed to be assessed insufficiently. The included models were judged to be of high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Current prognostic models for the FIM® in post-acute rehabilitation for patients with ABI lack the methodological rigor to support clinical use outside the development setting. Future studies addressing functional independence should ensure appropriate model validation and conform to uniform reporting standards for prognosis research.

Predicting length of stay with assessment of motor and process skills in subjects with acquired brain injury.

BACKGROUND: The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is a well-established predictor of length of stay (LOS) for rehabilitation. The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) is a more in-depth construct for measuring activities of daily living (ADL) and may therefore be a valuable adjunct when predicting LOS. This paper aimed to investigate AMPS as a candidate predictor of LOS in a statistical model including FIM. METHODS: A cohort study of 647 patients with acquired brain injuries admitted for rehabilitation. LOS was analyzed in a multiple regression model with the motor and process/cognitive domains of AMPS and FIM. RESULTS: Independence in ADL process ability and FIM cognition were associated with 31% (p < 0.001) and 38% (p < 0.001) shorter LOS, respectively, relative to patients needing total assistance. Independence in ADL motor ability was associated with a 26% (p = 0.002) shorter LOS, whereas FIM motor was not a predictor. CONCLUSIONS: The AMPS predicts LOS for rehabilitation at a level that is at least as good as that of FIM. Conducting the AMPS early in the course of inpatient rehabilitation provides clinicians and managers with valuable information for planning LOS.

Evaluation of the implementation of Armeo®Spring in a specialized neurorehabilitation center.

Rehabilitation of the upper extremity (UE) is an essential part of the process following an acquired brain injury, where robot technologies have the potential of making the rehabilitation more intensive and effective. However, the implementation of robot technologies in a clinical setting can be complicated and not always successful. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of the robot technology Armeo®Spring (Hocoma, Volketswil, Switzerland) at a specialized neurorehabilitation center, and to propose a list of actions for further implementation of the technology.The Study, Act and Plan phases of the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model for structuring technology implementations was applied as the methodological framework in this study. In the Study-phase, nine semi-structured interviews with therapists, using Armeo®Spring, were conducted to evaluate the current implementation. In the Act-phase, a workshop was held with 13 participants to discuss the findings of the Study-phase and to find possible solutions to the identified problems. The results were incorporated into a list of actions (Plan-phase) for further implementation of Armeo®Spring.Facilitating and inhibiting factors for the implementation of Armeo®Spring were identified. Facilitating factors were the practical "hands-on" approach during training, support from the management, support and sparring with colleagues as well as a positive work culture. The inhibiting factors were related to the retention of the therapists' acquired competencies, the identification of the type of patient that can benefit from this form of training, challenges due to the technical use of Armeo®Spring, and prioritization of the rehabilitation needs of the patients.Several solutions were proposed in the Act-phase, which subsequently resulted in eight concrete actions to facilitate the further implementation of Armeo®Spring. It is expected that these actions will contribute to the further implementation of Armeo®Spring at the neurorehabilitation center. As a first step, an Armeo®Spring group with therapists from all relevant wards was established.

Workplace discrimination as risk factor for long-term sickness absence: Longitudinal analyses of onset and changes in workplace adversity.

Workplace discrimination may affect the health of the exposed employees, but it is not known whether workplace discrimination is also associated with an increased risk of long-term sickness absence. The aim of this study was to examine the longitudinal associations of changes in and onset of workplace discrimination with the risk of long-term sickness absence. Data on workplace discrimination were obtained from 29,597 employees participating in survey waves 2004, 2006, 2008 and/or 2010 of the Finnish Public Sector Study. Four-year changes in long-term sickness absence (≥10 days of medically certified absence with a mental or non-mental diagnosis) were assessed. This covered successive study waves in analyses of onset of workplace discrimination as well as fixed effect analyses of change in workplace discrimination (concurrent i.e. during the exposure year and 1-year lagged i.e. within one year following exposure), by using each employee as his/her own control. The risk of long-term sickness absence due to mental disorders was greater for employees with vs. without onset of workplace discrimination throughout the 4-year period, reaching a peak at the year when the onset of discrimination was reported (adjusted risk ratio 2.13; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80-2.52). The fixed effects analyses showed that workplace discrimination was associated with higher odds of concurrent, but not 1-year lagged, long-term sickness absence due to mental disorders (adjusted odds ratio 1.61; 95% CI 1.33-1.96 and adjusted odds ratio 1.02; 95% CI 0.83-1.25, respectively). Long-term sickness absence due to non-mental conditions was not associated with workplace discrimination. In conclusion, these findings suggest that workplace discrimination is associated with an elevated risk of long-term sickness absence due to mental disorders. Supporting an acute effect, the excess risk was confined to the year when workplace discrimination occurred.

Externally validated model predicting gait independence after stroke showed fair performance and improved after updating.

OBJECTIVE: To externally validate recent prognostic models that predict independent gait following stroke. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic search identified recent models (<10 years) that predicted independent gait in adult stroke patients, using easily obtainable predictors. Predictors from the original models were assigned proxies when required, and model performance was evaluated in the validation cohort (n = 957). Models were updated to determine if performance could be improved. RESULTS: Three prognostic models met our criteria, all with high Risk of Bias. Validation data was only available for the Australian model. This model used National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and age to predict independent gait, using Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) walking item. For validation, Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) was a proxy for NIHSS, and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) locomotion item was a proxy for MAS. The Area Under the Curve was 0.77 (0.74-0.80) and had good calibration in the validation dataset. Adjustment of the intercept and regression coefficients slightly improved discrimination. By adding paretic leg strength, the model further improved (AUC 0.82). CONCLUSION: External validation of the Australian model with proxies showed fair discrimination and good calibration. Updating the model by adding paretic leg strength further improved model performance.

Assessment and rehabilitation interventions for central facial palsy in patients with acquired brain injury: a systematic review.

Objectives: To do a systematic review covering assessments and interventions for central facial palsy (CFP) in patients with acquired brain injury.Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, PsycInfo, and Web of Science were screened until April 2019. Assessments were defined as clinical- and instrumental tools and rating scales. Interventions were defined as rehabilitation interventions alleviating CFP.Results: 690 articles were screened based on the title and abstract. Interrater agreement was 98.12%. Sixteen articles were included: six clinical trials and 10 observational studies. Assessment: Commonest scale for assessing CFP was the House-Brackmann facial nerve Grading System. Strain gauges for measuring lip and cheek strength were applied in five studies and neurophysiological methods of assessing motor neuron pathways were applied in three studies. Interventions: An oral screen for improving lip strength was reported in three studies. Other interventions reported were neuromuscular electrical stimulation, Castillo Morales therapy, mirror therapy, exercises with electromyography feedback, and acupuncture.Conclusions: Scales for assessing peripheral facial palsy were applied for assessing CFP. Based on neurophysiological differences in the manifestation of peripheral facial palsy and CFP, these scales should be validated in patients with CFP. More studies on interventions for CFP are required before conclusions may be drawn about their effectiveness.