Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 26(3): 279-86, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24293350

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Quality monitoring has great relevance in stroke care. The Project "How to guarantee adherence to effective interventions in stroke care" aimed to estimate adherence to acute-phase guidelines in stroke care in Italy. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in 27 hospitals of 13 Italian Regions. Adherence to 15 process indicators was evaluated, comparing also stroke units (SU) with conventional wards. An overall score of care, defined as the sum of achieved indicators, was calculated. A multilevel hierarchical model described performance at patient, hospital and regional level. RESULTS: Overall, 484 consecutive stroke patients (mean age, 73.4 years; 52.7 % males) were included. Total score ranged from 2 to 15 (mean 8.5 ± 2.4). SU patients were more often evaluated with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) within 24 h, had more frequently an assessment of pre- and post-stroke disability, and a CT scan the same or the day after admission. Regional-hospital- and patient-level variability explained, respectively, 25, 34, and 41 % of total score variance. In multivariate models, patients >80 years vs. younger showed a change in total score of -0.45 (95 % CI -0.79 to -0.12), and those with NIHSS ≥14 vs. ≤5 of -0.92 (95 % CI -1.53 to -0.30). A negative change means a worse adjusted average adherence to process indicators. SU admission increased total score of 1.55 (95 % CI 0.52-2.58). CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the need of quality monitoring in stroke care. Although SU patients showed a better adherence to quality indicators, overall compliance was unsatisfactory.


Subject(s)
Quality Indicators, Health Care , Stroke/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospitals/standards , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Multivariate Analysis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Standard of Care , Stroke/diagnosis
2.
Chest ; 123(6): 2057-61, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12796189

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Noninvasive ventilation, although effective as treatment for patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema when prolonged for hours, is of limited use in the emergency department (ED). The aim of the study was to determine whether a short attempt at noninvasive pressure support ventilation avoids ICU admittance and to identify lack of response prediction variables. DESIGN: Prospective inception cohort study. SETTING: ED of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema who had been unresponsive to medical treatment and were admitted between January 1999 and December 2000. INTERVENTIONS: Pressure support ventilation was instituted through a full-face mask until the resolution of respiratory failure. A 15-min "weaning test" was performed to evaluate clinical stability. Responder patients were transferred to a medical ward. Nonresponding patients were intubated and were admitted to the ICU. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The included optimal length of intervention, the avoidance of ICU admittance, the incidence of myocardial infarction, and predictive lack of response criteria. RESULTS: Patients completed the trial (mean [+/- SD] duration, 96 +/- 40 min). None of the responders (43 patients; 74%) was subsequently ventilated or was admitted to the ICU. Two new episodes of myocardial infarction were observed. Thirteen of 58 patients died. A mean arterial pressure of < 95 mm Hg (odds ratio [OR], 10.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 60.8; p < 0.01) and COPD (OR, 9.4; 95% CI, 1.6 to 54.0; p < 0.05) at baseline predicted the lack of response to noninvasive ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: A short attempt at noninvasive ventilation is effective in preventing invasive assistance. A 15-min weaning test can identify patients who will not need further invasive ventilatory support. COPD and hypotension at baseline are negative predictive criteria.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Pulmonary Edema/therapy , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Acute Disease , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Edema/etiology , Time Factors
3.
Intensive Care Med ; 29(5): 834-40, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12684745

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the mortality of critically ill patients given either enteral feeding with an immune-enhancing formula or parenteral nutrition (PN). We report the results of a planned interim analysis on patients with severe sepsis which was undertaken earlier than planned once a meta-analysis suggested excess mortality in patients with severe sepsis given enteral immunonutrition. DESIGN: Randomised multicentre unblinded controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Thirty-three General Intensive Care Units in Italy. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Among the 237 recruited patients, 39 had severe sepsis or septic shock; 21 of them received PN. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients received either total PN or enteral nutrition, the latter containing extra L-arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin E, beta carotene, zinc, and selenium. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The primary endpoint for the subgroup analysis on patients with severe sepsis was mortality on Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The ICU mortality of patients with severe sepsis given enteral nutrition (EN) was higher than for those given PN (44.4% vs 14.3%; p=0.039). More patients given EN than patients given PN still had severe sepsis when they died (38.9% vs 9.5%, p=0.055). Recruitment of patients with severe sepsis was subsequently stopped. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that enteral immunonutrition, compared to PN, may be associated with excess mortality in patients with severe sepsis.


Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition , Parenteral Nutrition , Sepsis , APACHE , Energy Intake , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Sepsis/classification , Sepsis/mortality , Sepsis/therapy
4.
Intensive Care Med ; 28(11): 1661-3, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12415458

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the activities carried out by the staff of Italian ICUs and to quantify the amount of working time devoted to ICU patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, observational, multicenter study in 110 ICUs to report the non-ICU-related activities performed by ICU staff, together with the time such activities require. Of the 110 ICUs 80 participated in the project. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We found substantial variation in the number of activities carried out and in the working time allocated to such activities. Considering the differences in the number of employees, their salaries, and the amount of time spent performing various activities, it was found that the personnel cost for ICU activity was 83.4% (range 55-100%) of the total personnel costs. CONCLUSIONS: Given the wide variation in the number of activities performed and in the proportion of working time spent performing non-ICU related activities, data comparing costs between different ICUs should be interpreted with caution.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units/economics , Salaries and Fringe Benefits , Costs and Cost Analysis , Hospital Costs , Humans , Italy , Prospective Studies , Workforce , Workload
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...