ABSTRACT
Breast preservation has been shown to be a good alternative to mastectomy in selected patients with breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of cancer developing in the opposite breast to determine if breast preservation should be attempted in that breast as well. From 1979 to 1988, 172 women underwent tylectomy, axillary dissection and irradiation for carcinoma of the breast. All had follow-up mammogram. Mean age was 55 years. Mean follow-up time was 50 months. Thirteen patients (7.6%) developed cancer in the opposite breast. Three cancers were carcinoma in situ, nine were stage I, and one was stage IIa. Nine of 13 patients had breast preservation therapy, and four had mastectomies. Ten patients are alive with no evidence of disease, two are alive with disease and one died with disease. Breast preservation for bilateral breast cancer is a safe alternative if patients can be followed closely.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma/therapy , Neoplasms, Second Primary/therapy , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma in Situ/therapy , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Louisiana/epidemiology , Mastectomy , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Second Primary/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Survival RateABSTRACT
Infrarenal circumaortic occlusion devices were operatively placed in 74 New Zealand white rabbits. Two days after operation the animals were randomly assigned to one of seven treatment groups: I, control, n = 23; II, halothane, n = 8; III, thiopental, n = 12; IV, ketamine (30 mg/kg intravenously), n = 6; V, halothane+hypothermia, n = 8; VI, thiopental+hypothermia, n = 12; VII, ketamine+hypothermia, n = 5. In each group, the infrarenal aorta was occluded for 21 minutes. Final neurologic recovery after restitution of blood flow was graded as acute paraplegia, delayed paraplegia (neurologic deficit developing after initial recovery), or normal. Halothane alone was of no benefit. Hypothermia with any anesthetic was completely protective and reduced neurologic deficits to 0% compared with 91% in controls (p less than 0.05). Thiopental and ketamine treatment each reduced acute paraplegia to 17% (as compared with 61% in controls) and increased delayed paraplegia from 30% in controls to 75% and 50%, respectively (p less than 0.05 for thiopental, p = 0.10 for ketamine). The authors interpret the increase in delayed deficits and decrease in acute deficits as being the result of partial spinal cord protection. These findings document that this model of spinal cord ischemia is sufficiently sensitive to identify interventional treatments that protect the ischemic spinal cord.
