ABSTRACT
Background: Possible association between minerals contributing and mortality related to stroke were seen, but prospective data on the relation of vitamin D, magnesium and calcium serum levels with stroke were inconsistent. Consideration about the potential health effects of minerals and nutrients, the current study was conducted. Methods: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on 216 stroke survivors who were referred to the Ayatollah Rouhani Hospital of Babol, Iran. Demographic characteristics, clinical variables, and serum mineral levels were completed in the checklist. Admit score and discharge scale of these patients were determined according to the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale. A path model was constructed to explore the interrelationship between variables and to verify the relationship between variables and disability discharges. Results: Of 216 stroke patients, 185 (85.6%) cases were ischemic. The discharge status of 29 (12.9%) cases were severe or expired. The patients with moderate and severe admit scores, hemorrhagic stroke type, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and live in the village significantly had a poor discharge disability scale (all of p<0.05). Of all direct paths, Mg (ß=-2.85), and among indirect paths, calcium(ß=-3.59) had the highest effect on the discharge scale. Only mg had affected the discharge scale through direct and indirect (ß=-2.45) paths and had the greatest reverse effect on the discharge scale (ß=-5.30; totally). Conclusion: Hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia play a mediatory role in poor outcomes. Especially, hypomagnesemia was the direct parameter for poor outcomes. The independent role of each mineral in this issue is difficult to define and suggested for future study.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diabetic neuropathic pain (DNP) is a common complication of diabetes and has a profound effect on patients' quality of life. Therefore. The purpose of the present study was to compare the analgesic effects of duloxetine and nortryptiline in the management of patients with diabetic neuropathy. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial in subjects with a proven diagnosis of DM and suffered from neuropathic pain. Patients were recruited in this study from 20 February 2016 (first patient, first visit) to 22 June 2017 (last patient, last visit), including 5 weeks follow-up. A diagnosis of DNP was based on history, clinical examination, Nerve conduction velocity and Diabetic neuropathy symptom score (more than one point). RESULTS: Both drugs reduced pain when compared with placebo. A significant VAS reduction from 6.4 at baseline to 3.75 at endpoint was observed in the duloxetine group. However, there was no significant difference in the efficacy between nortriptyline and duloxetine based on patient's visual analogue scale (VAS) (p>0.05). No clinically significant changes or serious adverse events were found among treatment groups including changes in vital signs, laboratory assessments, physical examination or electrocardiograms. The decrease in the mean pain intensity was significantly greater in the duloxetine and nortriptyline group compared to the placebo group both in the primary analysis and in the by-visit analysis (p<0.003). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of both duloxetine and nortriptyline in the management of DNP.
