Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 48(10): 827-831, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31077871

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: to assess the agreement between saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) and transvaginal sonography (TVS) in the evaluation of cesarean section scar defect (CSD) regarding its width, depth, and shape and also in assessing the anterior myometrium, and residual myometrium related to the scar. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a prospective study during the period between August 2017 and January 2018 was conducted in which 102 consecutive participants underwent primary cesarean section in Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital were assessed six weeks after CS to evaluate for CSD presence by using both SCSH and TVS. RESULTS: CSD could be detected only in 59.8% of women by TVS and 70.5% by SCSH with good agreement strength (Cohen kappa = 0.805). TVS was 84.72% sensitive and 100.00% specific in identifying CSD diagnosed by SCSH. The PPV, NPV, and accuracy of TVS were 100.00%, 73.17%, and 89.21%, respectively. The mean anterior myometrial thickness (AMT) did not differ when assessed by both TVS and SCSH, while the mean niche width was 2.56 ± 1.98 mm with SCSH compared to 2.17 ± 1.63 mm with TVS(r = 0.954), and its mean depth was 2.76 ± 2.02 mm for SCSH and 1.57 ± 1.51 mm in TVS(r = 0.812). The mean residual myometrium was 10.09 ± 2.74 mm in SCSH while was 11.18 ± 2.50 mm for TVS(r = 0.914) CONCLUSION: cesarean scar defects in non-pregnant women are better evaluated at SCSH than at unenhanced TVS as more defects detected by SCSH and better evaluation of its shape, borders and size.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Cicatrix/diagnostic imaging , Myometrium/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Adult , Cicatrix/epidemiology , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Saline Solution , Sample Size , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
3.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 299(3): 665-673, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30564928

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of alpha lipoic acid (ALA) on uterine wound healing after primary cesarean section (CS). METHODS: A parallel-group, triple-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted in Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, involving 102 women undergoing pre-labor primary CS. The participants were randomly assigned using a computer-generated list of random numbers to receive oral ALA or a placebo twice daily for 6 weeks after CS. Allocation to either group was in a 1:1 ratio by an independent statistician (not involved in the treatment or data collection). The primary outcome was the presence of CS defect and measuring its depth and width. Secondary outcomes were measurements of the anterior myometrial and residual myometrium thicknesses, healing ratio and the presence of intrauterine adhesions. Assessment was done using saline contrast sonohysterography. RESULTS: Twenty (39.2%) women in the treatment group and ten (19.6%) controls had no niche (P value = 0.03, 95% CI - 0.388, - 0.0037). The absolute and relative risk reduction of forming a niche was 19.61% and 24.39%, respectively. The number of women needed to treat was five to avoid one niche formation. ALA use was associated with gastrointestinal upset in only three participants; however, none of the women withdrew during the study. CONCLUSION: In women undergoing primary CS, the administration of ALA for 6 weeks postpartum improved uterine healing and decreased the incidence of scar niche.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Thioctic Acid/metabolism , Uterine Diseases/drug therapy , Wound Healing/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Cesarean Section/methods , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...