Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 48(6): 810-823, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30442550

ABSTRACT

This study was performed to investigate sinus floor augmentation with two different particle sizes of demineralized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) by means of histological and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. A randomized clinical trial was conducted involving 10 individuals requiring two-stage bilateral maxillary sinus augmentation for implant installation. The patients were randomly divided into two groups following a split-mouth design: the maxillary sinus on one side was filled with small-sized particles (0.25-1mm) and on the contralateral side with large-sized particles (1-2mm). After a healing period of 8 months, 25 implants were placed. During implant site preparation, bone biopsies were obtained from each sinus, perpendicular to the long axis of the implant (buccal-palatal direction), for descriptive and histomorphometric analyses. IHC staining for protein expression of osteocalcin (OCN), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) was also performed. Histomorphometric analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the percentage of biomaterial (32.4±8.56% and 38.0±6.92%), newly formed bone (36.1±9.60% and 36.7±5.79%), or connective tissue (30.4±8.63% and 23.8±6.16%) between the small- and large-sized particle groups, respectively. IHC analysis did not reveal differences in the expression of OCN, VEGF, or TRAP. These findings suggest that both particle sizes of DBBM are effective for bone augmentation in the maxillary sinus.


Subject(s)
Bone Substitutes , Sinus Floor Augmentation , Animals , Bone Transplantation , Cattle , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Humans , Maxillary Sinus , Minerals , Particle Size , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 45(12): 1556-1563, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27692642

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare implant stability after maxillary sinus floor augmentation using small- or large-sized particles of Bio-Oss. Ten partially edentulous patients requiring bilateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation were enrolled. The subjects were assigned randomly to one of two experimental groups: maxillary sinus was filled with 0.25-1mm particle size (small particles) and the contralateral side was filled with 1-2mm particle size (large particles). After 8 months, a total of 25 implants were placed in the two maxillary sinuses. Primary implant stability was measured immediately after implant placement (T0) using a torque controller and resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Six months after implant placement (T1), the implant stability was measured again. There were no postoperative complications in either particle size group, and the success rate for implant survival was 100%. All implants showed good primary stability as evidenced by high torque for the implant insertion in both groups. RFA revealed high ISQ values for all implants installed in both groups at T0 and T1. These results indicate that the size of the Bio-Oss particles (small and large) did not influence implant stability in the maxillary sinus. Indeed, small and large particles of Bio-Oss presented optimal properties, supporting their possible use as osteoconductive grafts.


Subject(s)
Bone Substitutes/therapeutic use , Maxillary Sinus/surgery , Minerals/therapeutic use , Sinus Floor Augmentation/methods , Adult , Aged , Animals , Bone Transplantation , Cattle , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dental Restoration Failure , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Particle Size , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...