Analysis of rod/cone gap junctions from the reconstruction of mouse photoreceptor terminals.

Electrical coupling, mediated by gap junctions, contributes to signal averaging, synchronization, and noise reduction in neuronal circuits. In addition, gap junctions may also provide alternative neuronal pathways. However, because they are small and especially difficult to image, gap junctions are often ignored in large-scale 3D reconstructions. Here, we reconstruct gap junctions between photoreceptors in the mouse retina using serial blockface-scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy, and confocal microscopy for the gap junction protein Cx36. An exuberant spray of fine telodendria extends from each cone pedicle (including blue cones) to contact 40-50 nearby rod spherules at sites of Cx36 labeling, with approximately 50 Cx36 clusters per cone pedicle and 2-3 per rod spherule. We were unable to detect rod/rod or cone/cone coupling. Thus, rod/cone coupling accounts for nearly all gap junctions between photoreceptors. We estimate a mean of 86 Cx36 channels per rod/cone pair, which may provide a maximum conductance of ~1200 pS, if all gap junction channels were open. This is comparable to the maximum conductance previously measured between rod/cone pairs in the presence of a dopamine antagonist to activate Cx36, suggesting that the open probability of gap junction channels can approach 100% under certain conditions.

Neurons can talk to each other in two ways: they can send chemical messengers across specialized junctions between two cells, or they can directly pass electrical signals to one another. This latter process is made possible by gap junctions, a system of channel-like structures which connect neighbouring cells and let ions move between them. In most neurons, gap junction channels are made from a specialized protein called connexin 36. Gap junctions are small, difficult to observe, and therefore often ignored by researchers studying neural circuits. In response, Ishibashi et al. focused on nerve cells in the mouse retina, in particular the cones (which detect color during the day) and the rods (which are essential for night vision). Gap junctions between rods and cones allow them to communicate; for example, they enable rod signals to directly activate cones. This provides an alternative route for rod signaling known as the 'secondary rod pathway', which seems to be open at night and switches to closed around dawn. Both rods and cones only produce connexin 36, so Ishibashi et al. labeled these proteins with fluorescent tags to pinpoint gap junctions. This showed that each cone makes around 50 gap junctions with nearby rods; however, gap junctions were not detected between cells of the same type. In addition, 3D reconstruction helped to establish the length of each gap junction. Further experiments showed that a typical rod was connected to a cone by about 80 connexin 36 channels. Finally, calculations revealed that the gap junction channels would all need to open to account for the level of electrical activity required for the secondary rod pathway. This suggests that gap junctions may be much more active and important than previously thought. The work by Ishibashi et al. provides a new understanding of the number, size and activity of gap junctions in the retina, potentially paving the way to prevent diseases where light-sensing cells degenerate and cause blindness.

Genetic elimination of rod/cone coupling reveals the contribution of the secondary rod pathway to the retinal output.

In the retina, signals originating from rod and cone photoreceptors can reach retinal ganglion cells (RGCs)-the output neurons-through different pathways. However, little is known about the exact sensitivities and operating ranges of these pathways. Previously, we created rod- or cone-specific Cx36 knockout (KO) mouse lines. Both lines are deficient in rod/cone electrical coupling and therefore provide a way to selectively remove the secondary rod pathway. We measured the threshold of the primary rod pathway in RGCs of wild-type mice. Under pharmacological blockade of the primary rod pathway, the threshold was elevated. This secondary component was removed in the Cx36 KOs to unmask the threshold of the third rod pathway, still below cone threshold. In turn, the cone threshold was estimated by several independent methods. Our work defines the functionality of the secondary rod pathway and describes an additive contribution of the different pathways to the retinal output.

Molecular and functional architecture of the mouse photoreceptor network.

Mouse photoreceptors are electrically coupled via gap junctions, but the relative importance of rod/rod, cone/cone, or rod/cone coupling is unknown. Furthermore, while connexin36 (Cx36) is expressed by cones, the identity of the rod connexin has been controversial. We report that FACS-sorted rods and cones both express Cx36 but no other connexins. We created rod- and cone-specific Cx36 knockout mice to dissect the photoreceptor network. In the wild type, Cx36 plaques at rod/cone contacts accounted for more than 95% of photoreceptor labeling and paired recordings showed the transjunctional conductance between rods and cones was ~300 pS. When Cx36 was eliminated on one side of the gap junction, in either conditional knockout, Cx36 labeling and rod/cone coupling were almost abolished. We could not detect direct rod/rod coupling, and cone/cone coupling was minor. Rod/cone coupling is so prevalent that indirect rod/cone/rod coupling via the network may account for previous reports of rod coupling.

Sensory Processing: Visual Sensitivity Gets High at Night.

Every day and night, the retina undergoes dramatic changes in its physiology and function. The prevailing view is that these daily changes affect the retinal output and thereby visual perception. Recent evidence suggests that modifications in higher-order processing centers, and not in retinal computations, account for variations in visual sensitivity.

Chloride currents in cones modify feedback from horizontal cells to cones in goldfish retina.

In neuronal systems, excitation and inhibition must be well balanced to ensure reliable information transfer. The cone/horizontal cell (HC) interaction in the retina is an example of this. Because natural scenes encompass an enormous intensity range both in temporal and spatial domains, the balance between excitation and inhibition in the outer retina needs to be adaptable. How this is achieved is unknown. Using electrophysiological techniques in the isolated retina of the goldfish, it was found that opening Ca(2+)-dependent Cl(-) channels in recorded cones reduced the size of feedback responses measured in both cones and HCs. Furthermore, we show that cones express Cl(-) channels that are gated by GABA released from HCs. Similar to activation of I(Cl(Ca)), opening of these GABA-gated Cl(-) channels reduced the size of light-induced feedback responses both in cones and HCs. Conversely, application of picrotoxin, a blocker of GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors, had the opposite effect. In addition, reducing GABA release from HCs by blocking GABA transporters also led to an increase in the size of feedback. Because the independent manipulation of Ca(2+)-dependent Cl(-) currents in individual cones yielded results comparable to bath-applied GABA, it was concluded that activation of either Cl(-) current by itself is sufficient to reduce the size of HC feedback. However, additional effects of GABA on outer retinal processing cannot be excluded. These results can be accounted for by an ephaptic feedback model in which a cone Cl(-) current shunts the current flow in the synaptic cleft. The Ca(2+)-dependent Cl(-) current might be essential to set the initial balance between the feedforward and the feedback signals active in the cone HC synapse. It prevents that strong feedback from HCs to cones flood the cone with Ca(2)(+). Modulation of the feedback strength by GABA might play a role during light/dark adaptation, adjusting the amount of negative feedback to the signal to noise ratio of the cone output.

Connexin hemichannel mediated ephaptic inhibition in the retina.

Connexins are the building blocks of gap-junctions; sign conserving electrical synapses. Recently it has been shown that connexins can also function as hemichannels and can mediate a sign inverting inhibitory synaptic signal from horizontal cells to cones via an ephaptic mechanism. In this review we will discuss the critical requirements for such an ephaptic interaction and relate these to the available experimental evidence. The highly conserved morphological structure of the cone synapse together with a number of specific connexin proteins and proteoglycans present in the synaptic complex of the cones creates a synaptic environment that allows ephaptic interactions. The connexins involved are members of a special group of connexins, encoded by the GJA9 and GJA10 genes. Surprisingly, in contrast to many other vertebrates, mouse and other rodents seem to lack a GJA9 encoded connexin. The specific combination of substances that block feedback and the highly specific modification of feedback in a zebrafish lacking Cx55.5 hemichannels all point to an ephaptic feedback mechanism from horizontal cells to cones. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Electrical Synapses.

Synaptic transmission from horizontal cells to cones is impaired by loss of connexin hemichannels.

In the vertebrate retina, horizontal cells generate the inhibitory surround of bipolar cells, an essential step in contrast enhancement. For the last decades, the mechanism involved in this inhibitory synaptic pathway has been a major controversy in retinal research. One hypothesis suggests that connexin hemichannels mediate this negative feedback signal; another suggests that feedback is mediated by protons. Mutant zebrafish were generated that lack connexin 55.5 hemichannels in horizontal cells. Whole cell voltage clamp recordings were made from isolated horizontal cells and cones in flat mount retinas. Light-induced feedback from horizontal cells to cones was reduced in mutants. A reduction of feedback was also found when horizontal cells were pharmacologically hyperpolarized but was absent when they were pharmacologically depolarized. Hemichannel currents in isolated horizontal cells showed a similar behavior. The hyperpolarization-induced hemichannel current was strongly reduced in the mutants while the depolarization-induced hemichannel current was not. Intracellular recordings were made from horizontal cells. Consistent with impaired feedback in the mutant, spectral opponent responses in horizontal cells were diminished in these animals. A behavioral assay revealed a lower contrast-sensitivity, illustrating the role of the horizontal cell to cone feedback pathway in contrast enhancement. Model simulations showed that the observed modifications of feedback can be accounted for by an ephaptic mechanism. A model for feedback, in which the number of connexin hemichannels is reduced to about 40%, fully predicts the specific asymmetric modification of feedback. To our knowledge, this is the first successful genetic interference in the feedback pathway from horizontal cells to cones. It provides direct evidence for an unconventional role of connexin hemichannels in the inhibitory synapse between horizontal cells and cones. This is an important step in resolving a long-standing debate about the unusual form of (ephaptic) synaptic transmission between horizontal cells and cones in the vertebrate retina.

Hemichannel-mediated and pH-based feedback from horizontal cells to cones in the vertebrate retina.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies designed to identify the mechanism by which retinal horizontal cells communicate with cones have implicated two processes. According to one account, horizontal cell hyperpolarization induces an increase in pH within the synaptic cleft that activates the calcium current (Ca(2+)-current) in cones, enhancing transmitter release. An alternative account suggests that horizontal cell hyperpolarization increases the Ca(2+)-current to promote transmitter release through a hemichannel-mediated ephaptic mechanism. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To distinguish between these mechanisms, we interfered with the pH regulating systems in the retina and studied the effects on the feedback responses of cones and horizontal cells. We found that the pH buffers HEPES and Tris partially inhibit feedback responses in cones and horizontal cells and lead to intracellular acidification of neurons. Application of 25 mM acetate, which does not change the extracellular pH buffer capacity, does lead to both intracellular acidification and inhibition of feedback. Because intracellular acidification is known to inhibit hemichannels, the key experiment used to test the pH hypothesis, i.e. increasing the extracellular pH buffer capacity, does not discriminate between a pH-based feedback system and a hemichannel-mediated feedback system. To test the pH hypothesis in a manner independent of artificial pH-buffer systems, we studied the effect of interfering with the endogenous pH buffer, the bicarbonate/carbonic anhydrase system. Inhibition of carbonic anhydrase allowed for large changes in pH in the synaptic cleft of bipolar cell terminals and cone terminals, but the predicted enhancement of the cone feedback responses, according to the pH-hypothesis, was not observed. These experiments thus failed to support a proton mediated feedback mechanism. The alternative hypothesis, the hemichannel-mediated ephaptic feedback mechanism, was therefore studied experimentally, and its feasibility was buttressed by means of a quantitative computer model of the cone/horizontal cell synapse. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the data presented in this paper offers further support for physiologically relevant ephaptic interactions in the retina.

Lateral gain control in the outer retina leads to potentiation of center responses of retinal neurons.

The retina can function under a variety of adaptation conditions and stimulus paradigms. To adapt to these various conditions, modifications in the phototransduction cascade and at the synaptic and network levels occur. In this paper, we focus on the properties and function of a gain control mechanism in the cone synapse. We show that horizontal cells, in addition to inhibiting cones via a "lateral inhibitory pathway," also modulate the synaptic gain of the photoreceptor via a "lateral gain control mechanism." The combination of lateral inhibition and lateral gain control generates a highly efficient transformation. Horizontal cells estimate the mean activity of cones. This mean activity is subtracted from the actual activity of the center cone and amplified by the lateral gain modulation system, ensuring that the deviation of the activity of a cone from the mean activity of the surrounding cones is transmitted to the inner retina with high fidelity. Sustained surround illumination leads to an enhancement of the responses of transient ON/OFF ganglion cells to a flickering center spot. Blocking feedback from horizontal cells not only blocks the lateral gain control mechanism in the outer retina, but it also blocks the surround enhancement in transient ON/OFF ganglion cells. This suggests that the effects of the outer retinal lateral gain control mechanism are visible in the responses of ganglion cells. Functionally speaking, this result illustrates that horizontal cells are not purely inhibitory neurons but have a role in response enhancement as well.

Ephaptic interactions within a chemical synapse: hemichannel-mediated ephaptic inhibition in the retina.

The two best-known types of cell-cell communication are chemical synapses and electrical synapses, which are formed by gap junctions. A third, less well known, form of communication is ephaptic transmission, in which electric fields generated by a specific neuron alter the excitability of neighboring neurons as a result of their anatomical and electrical proximity. Ephaptic communication can be present in a variety of forms, each with their specific features and functional implications. One of these is ephaptic modulation within a chemical synapse. This type of communication has recently been proposed for the cone-horizontal cell synapse in the vertebrate retina. Evidence indicates that the extracellular potential in the synaptic terminal of photoreceptors is modulated by current flowing through connexin hemichannels at the tips of the horizontal cell dendrites, mediating negative feedback from horizontal cells to cones. This example can be added to the growing list of cases of ephaptic communication in the central nervous system.