Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 43
Filter
1.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 25(2): e14240, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38150580

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Monte Carlo (MC) simulations or measurements in anthropomorphic phantoms are recommended for estimating fetal dose in pregnant patients in radiotherapy. Among the many existing phantoms, there is no commercially available physical phantom representing the entire pregnant woman. PURPOSE: In this study, the development of a low-cost, physical pregnant female phantom was demonstrated using commercially available materials. This phantom is based on the previously published computational phantom. METHODS: Three tissue substitution materials (soft tissue, lung and bone tissue substitution) were developed. To verify Tena's substitution tissue materials, their radiation properties were assessed and compared to ICRP and ICRU materials using MC simulations in MV radiotherapy beams. Validation of the physical phantom was performed by comparing fetal doses obtained by measurements in the phantom with fetal doses obtained by MC simulations in computational phantom, during an MV photon breast radiotherapy treatment. RESULTS: Materials used for building Tena phantom are matched to ICRU materials using physical density, radiation absorption properties and effective atomic number. MC simulations showed that percentage depth doses of Tena and ICRU material comply within 5% for soft and lung tissue, up to 25 cm depth. In the bone tissue, the discrepancy is higher, but again within 5% up to the depth of 5 cm. When the phantom was used for fetal dose measurements in MV photon breast radiotherapy, measured fetal doses complied with fetal doses calculated using MC simulation within 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Physical anthropomorphic phantom of pregnant patient can be manufactured using commercial materials and with low expenses. The files needed for 3D printing are now freely available. This enables further studies and comparison of numerical and physical experiments in diagnostic radiology or radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Pregnant Women , Radiometry , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Photons/therapeutic use , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Computer Simulation , Phantoms, Imaging , Monte Carlo Method , Radiotherapy Dosage
2.
Phys Med ; 115: 103159, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37852021

ABSTRACT

It is well known that foetuses are highly sensitive to ionising radiation and special attention to justification and optimisation of radiological procedures involving a pregnant patient is required. A task to review, validate and compare different approaches to managing the pregnant patient and to estimating the associated foetal doses arising from a diagnostic or interventional radiology (DIR) procedure was designed in the framework of EURADOS working group 12. As a first step, a survey of radiation protection practice including dosimetry considerations among EURADOS members was performed using online questionnaire. Then, to evaluate the possible differences in the estimated foetal doses, a comparison of assessed dose values was made for three cases of pregnant patients that underwent different CT procedures. More than 120 professionals from 108 institutions and 17 countries that are involved in managing pregnant patients undergoing DIR procedures answered the questionnaire. Most of the respondents use national or hospital guidelines on the management of pregnant patients undergoing DIR procedures. However, the guidelines differ considerably among respondents. Comparison of foetal dose assessments performed by dosimetry experts showed the variety of methods used as well as large variability of estimated foetal doses in all three cases. Although European and International commission on radiation protection guidelines already exist, they are more than 20 years old and, in some aspects, they are obsolete. This paper shows that there is a need to revise and update these guidelines.


Subject(s)
Radiation Protection , Radiology, Interventional , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiography , Radiometry
3.
Insights Imaging ; 14(1): 108, 2023 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37336849

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Contact shielding (CS) of patients during X-ray studies has been used for decades to protect radiosensitive organs. This practice has not changed much despite increasing evidence that CS is not useful in many cases. The Gonad And Patient Shielding (GAPS) group-founded by representatives of the main European bodies involved in radiology-promoted this survey to assess the current practice of CS among European radiology departments and the attitude towards a non-shielding policy. METHODS: Over a four-month period (15 May-15th September 2021) European Society of Radiology and European Society of Paediatric Radiology radiologist members were invited to respond to a web-based questionnaire consisting of 59 questions. RESULTS: 225 centres from 35 countries responded to this survey. CS was routinely applied in at least one radiological modality in 49.2% of centres performing studies in adults, 57.5% of centres performing studies in children, and 47.8% of centres performing studies on pregnant women. CS was most frequently used in conventional radiography, where the most frequently shielded organs were the gonads, followed by thyroid, female breasts, and eye lens. 83.6% respondents would follow European recommendations on the use of CS when provided by the main European bodies involved in radiology. CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that CS is still largely used across Europe. However, a non-shielding policy could be adopted in most departments if European professional societies provided recommendations. In this regard, a strong commitment by European and national professional societies to educate and inform practitioners, patients and carers is paramount. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: According to this survey expectations of patients and carers, and skepticism among professionals about the limited benefits of CS are the most important obstacles to the application of a no-shielding policy. A strong commitment from European and national professional societies to inform practitioners, patients and carers is fundamental.

4.
Phys Med ; 108: 102565, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36989975

ABSTRACT

The paper presents the results of the activities under the IAEA Technical Cooperation programme in Europe and Central Asia, aiming to improve utilization of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in the region through identifying status, problems, and gaps in establishing and utilization of the DRLs, and suggesting potential solutions. Status was identified through a survey with two electronic questionnaires answered by the regulatory bodies for radiation protection of 26 IAEA Member States and 34 representatives of relevant professional bodies of medical physics, radiology, nuclear medicine or radiographers. Problems, good practices and potential solutions were identified as a result of the discussion during a regional workshop with 50 nominated representatives of 21 countries. Results were disseminated through open webinars. Existing gaps are related to the lack of adequate regulations in some countries, inadequate awareness of radiological professionals of DRLs as a tool for optimization, insufficient cooperation among relevant stakeholders, education, and staffing. Strengthening of the cooperation between regulatory and professional bodies could benefit the awareness and consequently the utilization of DRLs in clinical practice. The need of improved education and training of the DRL process was highlighted. Improved inspection procedures and education of inspectors would also support the process. Access to clinically qualified medical physicists was found to be critical for the DRL utilization. Suggestions were placed for continuous IAEA assistance through training, guidance and expert support.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Reference Levels , Nuclear Medicine , Europe , Surveys and Questionnaires , Referral and Consultation , Asia , Radiation Dosage
5.
Radiol Oncol ; 56(4): 541-551, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36259318

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of carcinoma during pregnancy is reported to be 1:1000-1:1500 pregnancies with the breast carcinoma being the most commonly diagnosed. Since the fetus is most sensitive to ionizing radiation during the first two trimesters, there are mixed clinical opinions and no uniform guidelines on the use of radiotherapy during pregnancy. Within this study the pregnant female phantom in the second trimester, that can be used for radiotherapy treatment planning (as DICOM data), Monte Carlo simulations (as voxelized geometry) and experimental dosimetry utilizing 3D printing of the molds (as .STL files), was developed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The developed phantom is based on MRI images of a female patient in her 18th week of pregnancy and CT images after childbirth. Phantom was developed in such a manner that a pregnant female was scanned "in vivo" using MRI during pregnancy and CT after childbirth. For the treatment of left breast carcinoma, 3D conformal radiotherapy was used. The voxelized geometry of the phantom was used for Monte Carlo (MC) simulations using Monte Carlo N-Particle transport codeTM 6.2 (MCNP). CONCLUSIONS: The modeled photon breast radiotherapy plan, applied to the phantom, indicated that the fetus dose is 59 mGy for 50 Gy prescribed to the breast. The results clearly indicate that only 9.5% of the fetal dose is caused by photons that are generated in the accelerator head through scattering and leakage, but the dominant component is scattered radiation from the patient's body.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Photons , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Phantoms, Imaging , Monte Carlo Method , Photons/therapeutic use , Radiometry/methods , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy
6.
Phys Med ; 96: 198-203, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34955383

ABSTRACT

Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control (AEC) systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff.


Subject(s)
Radiology Department, Hospital , Radiology , Child , Consensus , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Radiography , Radiology/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
7.
Insights Imaging ; 12(1): 194, 2021 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34939154

ABSTRACT

Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff.

8.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 50(8): 20210117, 2021 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34233497

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to determine the empirical formula for calculating the incident air kerma (Ki), used as a patient dose descriptor in the intraoral radiographic imaging. METHODS: The data for the formula were collected during the regular annual inspection of intraoral dental X-ray units in 2018, 2019 and early 2020. The measurement data of 50 X-ray units were processed to develop the formula. Exposure factors for imaging molars of the upper jaw of an average patient in a clinical setting were used in the measurement. The formula validity was statistically evaluated using coefficient of correlation, standard error of the fitted function and the mean relative percentage deviation. RESULTS: The measurement values of the radiation doses and calculated values obtained by using the final formula showed good agreement - the mean relative percentage deviation values less than ±15%. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are differences in X-ray units, voltages, manufacturers and device architectures (single-phase and high-frequency), the measurement data comply well with computed ones in all cases.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Humans , Radiography
9.
Phys Med ; 86: 44-56, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34052671

ABSTRACT

The use of patient contact-shielding has become a topic of intensive scientific debate. While it has been common practice during the last decades, some studies have questioned the efficiency of using such shielding while others have highlighted the inconsistencies in its application. The objective of this work is to review current recommendations and legislative documents on the use of out-of-field shielding in X-ray imaging, including those from national authorities and from international and national organisations and professional bodies. The review, performed within the framework of the activities of EURADOS Working Group 12, covers available recommendations on use of contact shielding in adult, pregnant and paediatric patients in general radiography, fluoroscopy, computed tomography, mammography and dental radiology. It includes a comprehensive search of 83 documents from 32 countries and 6 international organisations over the last 39 years. In general, using shielding is recommended only under two conditions: if it does not compromise the diagnostic task and the performance of the procedure and/or if it reassures the patient and comforters that they are appropriately protected against potentially harmful effects of radiation. There are very few specific regulatory requirements to use shielding in a particular imaging modality, although they may consider use of shielding either as part of good radiological practice or as requirements for availability of protective or ancillary tools, without further specification of their use. There is a wide variety of positions among documents that recommend out-of-field shielding, those that do not recommend it and those that are not specific. Therefore, evidence-based consensus is still needed to ensure best and consistent practice.


Subject(s)
Radiology , Adult , Child , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Radiography , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , X-Rays
10.
J Med Phys ; 45(1): 36-43, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32355433

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Introduction of dual-layer multileaf collimator (MLC) radiotherapy linear accelerators into clinical practice is an important development in advanced external beam radiotherapy. A method of delivering comparable high-resolution fluences with a single-layer MLC is presented. AIMS: The aims of this study are to present new algorithms and approaches to define high-resolution hypermodulated fluences, obtain orthogonal decomposition of fluences, and deliver them on a linear accelerator with single MLC from two perpendicular collimator settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: High-resolution fluences were defined using Monte Carlo (MC) calculation. A novel use of a limited-memory, bounded, Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno algorithm was used to decompose such fluences to ones deliverable with a pair of fields with mutually orthogonal collimator settings. Such a technique, here named cross motion leaf calculator (XMLC), is compared against single sliding window (SSW) technique typically used in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). An electronic portal imaging device (EPID) is used, and the results were compared with gamma analysis. Furthermore, MC was used to determine dose distributions for computed tomography images of ten head-and-neck cancer patients. RESULTS: Gamma analysis (3%, 3 mm) against ideal fluence is considerably more favorable to XMLC (94% ± 4%) versus SSW (76% ± 5%). Furthermore, the dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis showed that XMLC enables delivery of fluences superior to that of IMRT and these results in clinically relevant enhancements in DVH results. CONCLUSIONS: At the time of writing of this study, there were more than 12,000 medical linear accelerators in clinical use, and XMLC can prove itself useful wherever linac is equipped with MLC but cannot delivery latest techniques, such as volumetric modulated arc therapy.

11.
Radiol Oncol ; 54(2): 247-252, 2020 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32374291

ABSTRACT

Background High energy electron linear accelerators (LINACs) producing photon beams with energies higher than 10 MeV are widely used in radiation therapy. In these beams, fast neutrons are generated, which results in undesired contamination of the therapeutic beam. In this study, measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were used to obtain neutron spectra and dose equivalents in vicinity of linear accelerator. Materials and methods LINAC Siemens Oncor Expression in Osijek University Hospital is placed in vault that was previously used for 60Co machine. Then, the shielding of the vault was enhanced using lead and steel plates. Measurements of neutron dose equivalent around LINAC and the vault were done using CR-39 solid state nuclear track detectors. To compensate energy dependence of detectors, neutron energy spectra was calculated in measuring positions using MC simulations. Results The vault is a source of photoneutrons, but a vast majority of neutrons originates from accelerator head. Neutron spectra obtained from MC simulations show significant changes between the measuring positions. Annual neutron dose equivalent per year was estimated to be less than 324 µSv in the measuring points outside of the vault. Conclusions Since detectors used in this paper are very dependent on neutron energy, it is extremely important to know the neutron spectra in measuring points. Though, patient dosimetry should include neutrons, estimated annual neutron doses outside the vault were far below exposure limit of ionizing radiation for workers.


Subject(s)
Fast Neutrons , Particle Accelerators , Radiation Protection/methods , Monte Carlo Method , Neutrons , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiometry/methods , Time Factors
12.
Eur J Radiol ; 126: 108923, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32171911

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with hematuria and renal colic often undergo CT scanning. The purpose of our study was to assess variations in CT protocols and radiation doses for evaluation of hematuria and urinary stones in 20 countries. METHOD: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) surveyed practices in 51 hospitals from 20 countries in the European region according to the IAEA Technical cooperation classification and obtained following information for three CT protocols (urography, urinary stones, and routine abdomen-pelvis CT) for 1276 patients: patient information (weight, clinical indication), scanner information (scan vendor, scanner name, number of detector rows), scan parameters (such as number of phases, scan start and end locations, mA, kV), and radiation dose descriptors (CTDIvol, DLP). Two radiologists assessed the appropriateness of clinical indications and number of scan phases using the ESR Referral Guidelines and ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Descriptive statistics and Student's t tests were performed. RESULTS: Most institutions use 3-6 phase CT urography protocols (80 %, median DLP 1793-3618 mGy.cm) which were associated with 2.4-4.9-fold higher dose compared to 2-phase protocol (20 %, 740 mGy.cm) (p < 0.0001). Likewise, 52 % patients underwent 3-5 phase routine abdomen- pelvis CT (1574-2945 mGy.cm) as opposed to 37 % scanned with a single-phase routine CT (676 mGy.cm). The median DLP for urinary stones CT (516 mGy.cm) were significantly lower than the median DLP for the other two CT protocols (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Few institutions (4/13) use low dose CT for urinary stones. There are substantial variations in CT urography and routine abdomen-pelvis CT protocols result in massive radiation doses (up to 2945-3618 mGy.cm).


Subject(s)
Hematuria/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Urinary Calculi/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Urinary Tract/diagnostic imaging , Urography/methods
13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33383971

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Injectable synthetic bone grafts (ISBG) are widely used biomaterials for regeneration purposes. The aim of this case report was to examine the efficacy of ISBG in the management of buccal fenestration in the case of a 25-year-old female. CASE REPORT: After a traumatic tooth extraction, the defect was filled with ISBG and covered with a resorbable membrane. The ISBG showed easy handling and the patient had no complications during healing. Six months after augmentation, a bone biopsy was taken during implant bed preparation. The histological results showed good integration of ISBG into the newly formed bone and no signs of tissue inflammation. Additionally, a CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) analysis was performed to support the histological results. CONCLUSION: The use of the examined ISBG led to successful treatment of the buccal fenestration defect.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , Bone Regeneration , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal , Adult , Biocompatible Materials , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Tooth Extraction
14.
J Radiol Prot ; 38(4): 1412-1427, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30264736

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of the effective dose and dose area product (DAP) in dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations and to propose conversion factors for estimation of effective doses of the patients using DAP. Dependence of organ doses on DAP was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Different exposure geometries in Cranex3Dx CBCT device were simulated using Monte Carlo simulation and computational anthropomorphic phantom. Then organ doses and effective dose for every exposure geometry was compared to DAP and analysed. RESULTS: The effective dose in all simulated CBCT protocols and positions with 180° tube rotation ranged from 5 µSv for 50 × 50 mm2 field of view (FOV) localised on one tooth using lowest resolution to 265 µSv for the largest FOV and highest resolution. In case of 360° tube rotation the effective dose ranges from 6 to 332 µSv for the same FOV sizes and positions as well as resolutions as in 180° tube rotation. CONCLUSIONS: Though the DAP introduces a large uncertainty in the risk measure in dental CBCT, it represents the dose and FOV size which are the most important scanning parameters affecting the dose. To decrease uncertainty in the risk measure, the effective dose has to be estimated for usual clinical positions of the FOV.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Dental/methods , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiometry
15.
Radiol Oncol ; 52(3): 346-352, 2018 04 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30210046

ABSTRACT

Background The accuracy of dose calculation is crucial for success of the radiotherapy treatment. One of the methods that represent the current standard for patient-specific dosimetry is the evaluation of dose distributions measured with an ionization chamber array inside a homogeneous phantom using gamma method. Nevertheless, this method does not replicate the realistic conditions present when a patient is undergoing therapy. Therefore, to more accurately evaluate the treatment planning system (TPS) capabilities, gamma passing rates were examined for beams of different complexity passing through inhomogeneous phantoms. Materials and methods The research was performed using Siemens Oncor Expression linear accelerator, Siemens Somatom Open CT simulator and Elekta Monaco TPS. A 2D detector array was used to evaluate dose distribution accuracy in homogeneous, semi-anthropomorphic and anthropomorphic phantoms. Validation was based on gamma analysis with 3%/3mm and 2%/2mm criteria, respectively. Results Passing rates of the complex dose distributions degrade depending on the thickness of non-water equivalent material. They also depend on dose reporting mode used. It is observed that the passing rate decreases with plan complexity. Comparison of the data for all set-ups of semi-anthropomorphic and anthropomorphic phantoms shows that passing rates are higher in the anthropomorphic phantom. Conclusions Presented results raise a question of possible limits of dose distribution verification in assessment of plan delivery quality. Consequently, good results obtained using standard patient specific dosimetry methodology do not guarantee the accuracy of delivered dose distribution in real clinical cases.


Subject(s)
Radiometry , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Humans , Models, Anatomic , Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
16.
Med Dosim ; 43(4): 363-369, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29306538

ABSTRACT

Advanced dose calculation algorithms for radiation therapy treatment planning can report external beam photon dose 2-sided, in terms of dose-to-medium (Dm) and dose-to-water (Dw). The purpose of our study was to determinate the effect of Dw and Dm reporting modes built in Elekta Monaco treatment planning system on intensity-modulated radiotherapy dose distributions for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer. For 13 patients involved in this retrospective study, 2 plans were created: 1 using Dw and another according to Dm reporting mode. Treatment plans were normalized such that 100% planning target volume should be covered by 95% of prescribed dose. Dose-volume constraints were assigned according to international standards. The comparison between dose distributions was performed evaluating quantities important for respective volumes of interest. For target volumes, heterogeneity index and conformity index methodology were used along with the maximum dose concept. Also, for the comparisons over particular organ at risk, maximum dose or mean dose as well as dose-volume concepts were used. For all target volumes and majority of organs at risk, the differences between 2 reporting modes are statistically insignificant, but this is not the case for bony structured organs at risks: mandible and cochlea. It was observed that Dw is higher than Dm with mean difference of 9.91% (p = 0.000009) of the mandible volume covered with 70 Gy. The same trend was observed for left and right cochlea with difference in mean dose of 8.74% (p = 0.037) and 6.87% (p = 0.029), respectively. The comparative analysis of dosimetric parameters in this study shows that the selection of reporting modes in Monaco treatment planning system can produce dose differences up to 15% in high-density volumes such as mandible and cochlea, which might have clinical consequences.


Subject(s)
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Cochlea/radiation effects , Humans , Mandible/radiation effects , Organs at Risk , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
17.
PLoS One ; 12(6): e0180057, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28662092

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study presents national surveys of patient exposure from nuclear medicine (NM) diagnostic procedures in 2010 and 2015 in the Republic of Croatia. METHODS: The survey was performed according to the European Commission Dose DataMed (DDM) project methodology. 28 most frequent NM diagnostic procedures were identified. Data about frequencies of procedures and average administered activities of radioisotopes used in those procedures were collected. Average administered activities were converted to effective doses according to the dose conversion coefficients. Then the collective effective dose to the population and an effective dose per capita were calculated based on the number of the most frequent NM diagnostic procedures and the average effective dose per procedure. RESULTS: In 2010, 41200 NM diagnostic procedures led to 146.7 manSv collective effective dose to the population and in 2015, 42000 NM diagnostic procedures led to 146.8 manSv collective effective dose to the population. The frequencies of NM diagnostic procedures were 9.7 and 9.8 annually per 1000 population with 34.1 µSv and 34.2 µSv effective dose per capita for 2010 and 2015, respectively. The main contributors to the annual collective dose from NM in Croatia are examinations of the bone, heart, thyroid and PET/CT tumour diagnostic. Average administered activities have not changed considerably from 2010 to 2015. Nevertheless, within the frequency of some of the procedures, significant changes were found in five-year period. CONCLUSIONS: Frequencies, average administered activities and collective effective dose to the population from NM diagnostic procedures in Croatia are comparable to the values reported by other European surveys. Changes were found between 2010 and 2015 and we intend to perform this study periodically to identify possible trends, but also to raise awareness about the potential dose optimization.


Subject(s)
Nuclear Medicine , Radiation Dosage , Croatia , Humans , Uncertainty
18.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 165(1-4): 259-62, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25848111

ABSTRACT

The number of coronary interventions increased substantially in the recent years. Although of great benefit to patients, these procedures can subject patients to considerable radiation doses. There is a legal framework for patient dose measurements in Croatia during radiological procedures, but in practice, it applies only occasionally. A quality control manual, established at the University Hospital Osijek, was accepted by other major cardiology centres in Croatia; besides checking the technical characteristics of the device, it provides constant measurement and analysis of patient doses in interventional cardiology. It also includes patient examination for radiation skin injuries in case of dose of >2 Gy. The aim of the study was to determine and compare patient radiation doses during cardiological interventions measured within 4 y in four major cardiology centres with the values proposed by the European Commission and other professional bodies. The local reference dose levels were also set.


Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Radiation Dosage , Radiology, Interventional/methods , Radiometry/methods , Cardiology/methods , Croatia , Fluoroscopy/adverse effects , Hospitals , Humans , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Patient Safety , Protective Devices , Quality Control , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/methods , Skin/radiation effects
19.
Eur Radiol ; 23(3): 623-31, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22940731

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To survey procedures and protocols in paediatric computed tomography (CT) in 40 less resourced countries. METHODS: Under a project of the International Atomic Energy Agency, 146 CT facilities in 40 countries of Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America responded to an electronic survey of CT technology, exposure parameters, CT protocols and doses. RESULTS: Modern MDCT systems are available in 77 % of the facilities surveyed with dedicated paediatric CT protocols available in 94 %. However, protocols for some age groups were unavailable in around 50 % of the facilities surveyed. Indication-based protocols were used in 57 % of facilities. Estimates of radiation dose using CTDI or DLP from standard CT protocols demonstrated wide variation up to a factor of 100. CTDI(vol) values for the head and chest were between two and five times those for an adult at some sites. Sedation and use of shielding were frequently reported; immobilisation was not. Records of exposure factors were kept at 49 % of sites. CONCLUSION: There is significant potential for improvement in CT practice and protocol use for children in less resourced countries. Dose estimates for young children varied widely. This survey provides critical baseline data for ongoing quality improvement efforts by the IAEA.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Protection/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Africa/epidemiology , Asia/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Latin America/epidemiology , Radiation Dosage
20.
Med Dosim ; 38(1): 100-4, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23246197

ABSTRACT

Implementation of advanced techniques in clinical practice can greatly improve the outcome of radiation therapy, but it also makes the process much more complex with a lot of room for errors. An important part of the quality assurance program is verification of treatment planning system (TPS). Dosimetric verifications in anthropomorphic phantom were performed in 4 centers where new systems were installed. A total of 14 tests for 2 photon energies and multigrid superposition algorithms were conducted using the CMS XiO TPS. Evaluation criteria as specified in the International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Reports Series (IAEA TRS) 430 were employed. Results of measurements are grouped according to the placement of the measuring point and the beam energy. The majority of differences between calculated and measured doses in the water-equivalent part of the phantom were in tolerance. Significantly more out-of-tolerance values were observed in "nonwater-equivalent" parts of the phantom, especially for higher-energy photon beams. This survey was done as a part of continuous effort to build up awareness of quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) importance in the Croatian radiotherapy community. Understanding the limitations of different parts of the various systems used in radiation therapy can systematically improve quality as well.


Subject(s)
Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Radiation Oncology/standards , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/standards , Croatia , Guideline Adherence , Guidelines as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...