Evaluation of aspirin platelet inhibition in left ventricular assist device population.

INTRODUCTION: Aspirin therapy is recommended in durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients to prevent thromboembolic complications. Up to 30% of patients treated with aspirin may demonstrate aspirin resistance, which has been related to thrombotic complications. However, it is unknown whether individual patients exhibit temporal alterations in aspirin sensitivity during LVAD support. We hypothesized that aspirin platelet inhibition would wane after the initial postimplant period. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, single center study conducted at an academic medical center. This study evaluated changes in aspirin platelet inhibition over the first 6 months of LVAD support. Patients who underwent placement of centrifugal LVAD with aspirin platelet sensitivity assays were included for analysis. Aspirin responsiveness was assessed postimplant after 5 days, 3 months, and 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were included for analysis of which 7% of patients were aspirin resistant initially. At 3 months, 32% (odds ratio [OR], 6.1, p = .03) of patients were aspirin resistant and 28% (OR, 4.1, p = .1) at 6 months. Over the first 3 months postimplant, the odds of aspirin resistance increased sixfold and remained relatively constant at 6 months. Patients who were aspirin resistant and received an increase in aspirin dose at 3 months subsequently had a sensitive ARU at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Aspirin responsiveness not only varies between patients but can significantly wane within individual LVAD patients over time. Additional study is needed to determine if monitoring aspirin resistance may prevent thrombotic complications after LVAD implantation.

Best Practices in Specialized Amyloidosis Centers in the United States: A Survey of Cardiologists, Nurses, Patients, and Patient Advocates.

BACKGROUND: Because transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) poses unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, referral of patients with known or suspected disease to specialized amyloidosis centers is recommended. These centers have developed strategic practices to provide multidisciplinary comprehensive care, but their best practices have not yet been well studied as a group. METHODS: A qualitative survey was conducted by telephone/email from October 2019 to February 2020 among eligible healthcare providers with experience in the management of ATTR-CM at US amyloidosis centers, patients with ATTR-CM treated at amyloidosis centers, and patient advocates from amyloidosis patient support groups. RESULTS: Fifteen cardiologists and 9 nurse practitioners/nurses from 15 selected amyloidosis centers participated in the survey, with 16 patients and 4 patient advocates. Among participating healthcare providers, the most frequently cited center best practices were diagnostic capability, multidisciplinary care, and time spent on patient care; the greatest challenges involved coordination of patient care. Patients described the "ideal" amyloidosis program as one that provides physicians with expertise in ATTR-CM, sufficient time with patients, comprehensive patient care, and opportunities to participate in research/clinical trials. The majority of centers host patient support group meetings, and patient advocacy groups provide support for centers with physician/patient education and research. CONCLUSIONS: Amyloidosis centers offer comprehensive care based on staff expertise in ATTR-CM, a multidisciplinary approach, advanced diagnostics, and time dedicated to patient care and education. Raising awareness of amyloidosis centers' best practices among healthcare providers can reinforce the benefits of early referral and comprehensive care for patients with ATTR-CM.

Management of heart failure in cardiac amyloidosis using an ambulatory diuresis clinic.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent congestion in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) remains a management challenge, often requiring high dose diuretics and frequent hospitalizations. Innovative outpatient strategies are needed to effectively manage heart failure (HF) in patients with CA. Ambulatory diuresis has not been well studied in restrictive cardiomyopathy. Therefore, we aimed to examine the outcomes of an ambulatory diuresis clinic in the management of congestion related to CA. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively studied patients with CA seen in an outpatient HF disease management clinic for (1) safety outcomes of ambulatory intravenous (IV) diuresis and (2) health care utilization. Forty-four patients with CA were seen in the clinic a total of 203 times over 6 months. Oral diuretics were titrated at 96 (47%) visits. IV diuretics were administered at 56 (28%) visits to 17 patients. There were no episodes of severe acute kidney injury or symptomatic hypotension. There was a significant decrease in emergency department and inpatient visits and associated charges after index visit to the clinic. The proportion of days hospitalized per 1000 patient days of follow-up decreased as early as 30 days (147.3 vs 18.1/1000 patient days of follow-up, P< .001) and persisted through 180 days (33.6 vs 22.9/1000 patient days of follow-up, P< .001) pre- vs post-index visit to the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of ambulatory IV diuresis in patients with CA. Our findings also suggest that use of a HF disease management clinic may reduce acute care utilization in patients with CA. Leveraging multidisciplinary outpatient HF clinics may be an effective alternative to hospitalization in patients with HF due to CA, a population who otherwise carries a poor prognosis and contributes to high health care burden.

Postpartum dyspnea in a breast cancer survivor.

: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and the second leading cause of cancer death in the world. As treatments advance and survival increases among breast cancer survivors, we will continue to see more obstetric patients exposed to anthracycline drugs. Anthracycline toxicity risk is dose dependent, and any exposure to anthracyclines places obstetric patients at risk to cardiotoxicity. In this case report, we explore the potential chemotherapy toxicities of anthracycline exposure.

Seven factors predict a delayed diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis.

INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic delay of cardiac amyloidosis (CAm) continues to challenge clinicians. We investigated features associated with delay and ascertained if a diagnostic delay had negative implications for the patient. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review identifying 82 subjects with biopsy-proven and mass-spectrometry-identified CAm with clinical and epidemiologic data including first potential symptom of amyloidosis. Pathology slides were scored for extent of amyloid. Robust statistical analyses including generalized linear and ordered logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: There was a 22 month (median) delay in diagnosis, more pronounced (34 months) in subjects with transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis. Seven factors predict a delayed diagnosis including ATTR amyloid type (ratio =2.17, 95% CI 1.31-3.59), having carpal tunnel syndrome (2.13, CI 1.49-3.03) and age <70 at first symptom (1.85, CI 1.30-2.61). Individuals with delays of 1+ years had higher levels of NT proBNP (4451 vs. 2559 pg/mL, p = .016) and longer PR intervals (225 vs. 162 ms, p < .001) at the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic delays negatively affect cardiac function. Of the predictive clinical features, carpal tunnel syndrome was frequent and its presence should lead to a more aggressive analysis for CAm in the appropriate clinical settings.