ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend supervised exercise therapy (SET) as the preferred initial treatment for patients with intermittent claudication. The availability of SET programmes is, however, limited and such programmes are often not reimbursed. Evidence for the long-term cost-effectiveness of SET compared with endovascular revascularization (ER) as primary treatment for intermittent claudication might aid widespread adoption in clinical practice. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to determine the incremental costs, incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of SET versus ER for a hypothetical cohort of patients with newly diagnosed intermittent claudication, from the Dutch healthcare payer's perspective. In the event of primary treatment failure, possible secondary interventions were repeat ER, open revascularization or major amputation. Data sources for model parameters included original data from two RCTs, as well as evidence from the medical literature. The robustness of the results was tested with probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Considering a 5-year time horizon, probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that SET was associated with cost savings compared with ER (-6412, 95 per cent credibility interval (CrI) -11 874 to -1939). The mean difference in effectiveness was -0·07 (95 per cent CrI -0·27 to 0·16) QALYs. ER was associated with an additional 91 600 per QALY gained compared with SET. One-way sensitivity analysis indicated more favourable cost-effectiveness for ER in subsets of patients with low quality-of-life scores at baseline. CONCLUSION: SET is a more cost-effective primary treatment for intermittent claudication than ER. These results support implementation of supervised exercise programmes in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures/economics , Exercise Therapy/economics , Intermittent Claudication/therapy , Aged , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Exercise Therapy/methods , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Reperfusion/economics , Reperfusion/methods , Walking/economics , Walking/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Long-term comparisons of supervised exercise therapy (SET) and endovascular revascularization (ER) for patients with intermittent claudication are scarce. The long-term clinical effectiveness of SET and ER was assessed in patients from a randomized trial. METHODS: Consenting patients with intermittent claudication were assigned randomly to either SET or ER. Outcome measures on functional performance (pain-free and maximum walking distance, ankle : brachial pressure index), quality of life (QoL) and number of secondary interventions were measured at baseline and after approximately 7 years of follow-up. Repeated-measurement and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to analyse the data on an intention-to treat-basis. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were randomized initially to either SET or ER. After 7 years, functional performance (P < 0.001) and QoL (P ≤ 0.005) had improved after both SET and ER. Long-term comparison showed no differences between the two treatments, except in the secondary intervention rate, which was significantly higher after SET (P = 0.001). Nevertheless, the total number of endovascular and surgical interventions (primary and secondary) remained higher after ER (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the longer term, SET-first or ER-first treatment strategies were equally effective in improving functional performance and QoL in patients with intermittent claudication. The substantially higher number of invasive interventions in the ER-first group supports a SET-first treatment strategy for intermittent claudication. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR199 (http://www.trialregister.nl).
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon/methods , Exercise Therapy/methods , Intermittent Claudication/therapy , Stents , Food Quality , Humans , Intermittent Claudication/physiopathology , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Reperfusion/methods , Treatment Outcome , Walking/physiologyABSTRACT
The present work examines the role of uremia and the effect of dialysis treatment on red blood cells (RBCs) membrane properties of hemodialysis patients. The results showed that, the uremic patients had a lower values of erythrocyte deformability than that of healthy control subject. The median osmotic fragility (MOF) showed a significant increase in hemodialyzed patients than that for control group. The osmotic resistance to hemolysis was improved after dialysis. The solubilization process of the RBCs membrane showed that the detergent concentration needed to solubilize the RBCs membrane for uremic patient was much higher than that for control group. The abnormalities of the present results for RBCs membrane properties are mostly related to membrane fluidity, which are slightly improved after dialysis. Biochemical analysis showed a decreasing trend in RBCs count, urea nitrogen, creatinine, potassium,
