ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Identifying a patient's dominant language hemisphere is an important evaluation performed prior to epilepsy surgery and is commonly assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). However, the lack of standardization and resultant heterogeneity of fMRI paradigms used in clinical practice limits the ability of cross-center comparisons to be made regarding language laterality results. METHODS: Through surveying Canadian Epilepsy Centres in combination with reviewing supporting literature, current fMRI language lateralization practices for the clinical evaluation of patients with epilepsy were assessed. To encourage standardization of this practice, we outlined a two-part paradigm series that demonstrates widespread acceptance, reliability and accessibility in lateralizing various aspects of language functioning in individuals with average or near-average IQ and normal literacy skills. RESULTS: The collected data confirm a lack of standardization in fMRI laterality assessments leading to clinical heterogeneity in stimulation and control tasks, paradigm design and timing, laterality index calculations, thresholding values and analysis software and technique. We suggest a Sentence Completion (SC) and Word Generation (WG) paradigm series as it was most commonly employed across Canada, demonstrated reliability in lateralizing both receptive and expressive language areas in supporting literature, and could be readily intelligible to an inclusive population. CONCLUSION: Through providing recommendations for a two-part paradigm series, we hope to contribute to the standardization of this practice across Canada to reduce clinical heterogeneity, encourage communicability between institutions, and enhance methodologies for the surgical treatment of epilepsy for the benefit of all individuals living with epilepsy in Canada.
ABSTRACT
Electrophysiological characterization of live human tissue from epilepsy patients has been performed for many decades. Although initially these studies sought to understand the biophysical and synaptic changes associated with human epilepsy, recently, it has become the mainstay for exploring the distinctive biophysical and synaptic features of human cell-types. Both epochs of these human cellular electrophysiological explorations have faced criticism. Early studies revealed that cortical pyramidal neurons obtained from individuals with epilepsy appeared to function "normally" in comparison to neurons from non-epilepsy controls or neurons from other species and thus there was little to gain from the study of human neurons from epilepsy patients. On the other hand, contemporary studies are often questioned for the "normalcy" of the recorded neurons since they are derived from epilepsy patients. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of the distinct biophysical features of human cortical neurons and glia obtained from tissue removed from patients with epilepsy and tumors. We then explore the concept of within cell-type diversity and its loss (i.e., "neural homogenization"). We introduce neural homogenization to help reconcile the epileptogenicity of seemingly "normal" human cortical cells and circuits. We propose that there should be continued efforts to study cortical tissue from epilepsy patients in the quest to understand what makes human cell-types "human".
