ABSTRACT
The biocompatibility of titanium implants in bone depends on the response shown by cells in contact with the implant surface. Several developments have been targeted at achieving successful implant treatment. The aim of this study was to develop a novel preparation procedure to evaluate the bone cell response produced at the bone-implant interface using the technique scanning electron microscopy with backscattered electron imaging (SEM-BSE). Dental prostheses with an SLA-modified or TOP-modified surface were implanted in a toothless part of the mandibula in female pigs. The animals were sacrificed 12 weeks after surgery, at which time block specimens containing the implants were obtained. These specimens were then processed for SEM-BSE by optimizing a protocol involving chemical fixation and heavy metal staining. In addition, element distribution maps for the implant-bone tissue interface were obtained using a microanalytical system based on energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS). This novel visualisation approach enabled a comprehensive study of the extracellular matrix and cell components of the host tissues neoformed around the implant. SEM-BSE images also provided ultrastructural details of the bone cells. This technique appears to be an effective and very promising tool for detailed studies on the implant-bone tissue interface and the host response to the bone incorporation process.
Subject(s)
Bone and Bones/ultrastructure , Dental Implants , Osseointegration , Animals , Electron Probe Microanalysis , Female , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Swine , TitaniumABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The present report demonstrates the usefulness of flow cytometry for a quantitative assessment of adhesion inhibition of a Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain to human epithelial cells to acquire more information about the nature of its adhesins. METHODS: The inhibition of the adhesive process to Hep-2 was assayed by adding several monosaccharides to infected cells monolayers. The quantification of the adherent bacteria, labeled with a specific primary antibody plus a secondary fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated antibody, was performed by flow cytometry in comparison with light microscopy. The adherence was quantified in terms of the proportion of cells with adherent V. parahaemolyticus and as the mean of adherent bacteria per cell. RESULTS: The adhesion showed a percentage of 98% with a mean fluorescence channel of 331 comparable to those obtained by light microscopy. The addition of monosaccharides resulted in a D-mannose and N-acetyl-galactosamine sensitive adherence. Even if this environmental strain also showed a mannose-sensitive cell-associated hemoagglutination that could mediate V. parahaemolyticus adherence, our results suggest that different sites for an irreversible adherence to host cell are involved. CONCLUSIONS: Flow cytometry in combination with indirect immunofluorescence is an effective tool to investigate the adhesive process of bacteria to epithelial cells because it is more sensitive and reproducible than visual counting of bacteria performed in light microscopy.