Cytoreductive nephrectomy in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a US Food and Drug Administration pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: This pooled analysis of patient-level data from trials evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with or without cytoreductive nephrectomy before a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor and antiangiogenic therapy. METHODS: Data from 5 trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus antiangiogenic therapy were pooled. Only patients with stage 4 disease at initial diagnosis were included to ensure that nephrectomy was performed for cytoreductive purposes and not to previously treat an earlier stage of disease. The effect of cytoreductive nephrectomy before immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy on outcomes was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards regression model, adjusted for age, sex, risk group, performance status, and the presence of sarcomatoid differentiation. RESULTS: A total of 981 patients were included. The estimated median progression-free survival with and without nephrectomy was 15 and 11 months, respectively; the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.71 (95% confidence interval = 0.59 to 0.85). The estimated median overall survival with and without nephrectomy was 46 and 28 months, respectively; the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.63 (95% confidence interval = 0.51 to 0.77). Objective response was 60% of patients with vs 46% of patients without cytoreductive nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who undergo cytoreductive nephrectomy before immune checkpoint inhibitor plus antiangiogenic therapy had improved outcomes compared with patients without cytoreductive nephrectomy. Selection factors for cytoreductive nephrectomy may be prognostic and could not be fully controlled for in this retrospective analysis. Prospective determination of and stratification by prior cytoreductive nephrectomy may be considered when designing clinical trials to assess the impact of this factor on prognosis.

Efficacy of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors by Individual Genes in Homologous Recombination Repair Gene-Mutated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A US Food and Drug Administration Pooled Analysis.

PURPOSE: We performed a pooled analysis of multiple trials of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to investigate the efficacy of PARPi in each individual homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutated (m) gene. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We pooled patient-level data from trials of PARPi in mCRPC that reported mutation status in individual HRR genes. Any HRR gene with available data across all the randomized trials of PARPi in first-line mCRPC was selected. The hazard ratios (HRs; 95% CI) for radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; by blinded independent review) and overall survival (OS) of a PARPi plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) relative to placebo plus an ARPI in the pool of three randomized trials in first-line mCRPC were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In ATMm (N = 268), rPFS HR was 1.05 (0.74 to 1.49) and OS HR was 1.18 (0.82 to 1.71). In BRCA1m (N = 64), rPFS HR was 0.51 (0.23 to 1.1) and OS HR was 0.74 (0.34 to 1.61). In BRCA2m (N = 422), rPFS HR was 0.31 (0.23 to 0.42) and OS HR was 0.66 (0.49 to 0.89). In CDK12m (N = 164), rPFS HR was 0.50 (0.32 to 0.80) and OS HR was 0.63 (0.39 to 0.99). In CHEK2m (N = 172), rPFS HR was 1.06 (0.67 to 1.66) and OS HR was 1.53 (0.95 to 2.46). In PALB2m (N = 41) rPFS HR was 0.52 (0.23 to 1.17) and OS HR was 0.78 (0.34 to 1.8). CONCLUSION: In this pooled analysis, benefit from PARPi appeared greatest for patients with BRCA1m, BRCA2m, CDK12m, and PALB2m. Given limitations of this exploratory analysis, the apparent lack of benefit from PARPi in patients with CHEK2m or ATMm should be further explored in future clinical trials.

FDA Approval Summary: Olaparib in Combination With Abiraterone for Treatment of Patients With BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: This article summarizes the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review of the data leading to approval of olaparib plus abiraterone for the treatment of patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious BRCA-mutated (BRCAm) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), as determined by an FDA-approved companion diagnostic test. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Approval was based on the results from PROpel, a double-blind trial that randomly assigned 796 patients with mCRPC to abiraterone plus prednisone or prednisolone with either olaparib or placebo. The primary end point was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per investigator assessment. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement in rPFS for olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone, with a median rPFS of 25 versus 17 months and a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.81) in the intention-to-treat population. In an exploratory analysis of the subgroup of 85 patients with BRCAm mCRPC, the HR for rPFS was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.45) and the HR for overall survival (OS) was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.59). In an exploratory analysis of the subgroup of 711 patients without an identified BRCA mutation, the HR for rPFS was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.96) and the HR for OS was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.14). Adding olaparib to abiraterone resulted in increased toxicity, including anemia requiring transfusion in 18% of patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with mCRPC, efficacy of the combination of olaparib plus abiraterone was primarily attributed to the treatment effect in the BRCAm subgroup, the indicated population for the approval. For patients without BRCAm, the FDA determined that the modest rPFS improvement, combined with clinically significant toxicities, did not demonstrate a favorable risk/benefit assessment.

A U.S. Food and Drug Administration-pooled Analysis of Frontline Combination Treatment Survival Benefits by Risk Groups in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: While frontline immuno-oncology/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO/TKI) combination therapy has established a benefit in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), this may differ by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk grouping. Looking at individual trials, we noted an apparently smaller magnitude of benefit for favorable-risk disease. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess treatment benefit by risk groupings, especially in favorable-risk, augmenting patient numbers via a pooled analysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We pooled four frontline mRCC trials of IO/TKI combinations including 3,098 patients (839 favorable-risk) with approvals from 2019 to 2021. INTERVENTION: All trials used IO/TKI combinations as the treatment option and sunitinib as the control. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We analyzed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by IMDC groupings. To specifically address the favorable-risk group, we combined all others into an intermediate/poor-risk group. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In this exploratory analysis adjusted for baseline covariates, IO/TKI combinations have yet to demonstrate an OS benefit in favorable-risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86, 1.78) despite demonstrating an OS benefit in the intermediate/poor-risk group (HR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.75). In contrast, IO/TKI demonstrated a PFS benefit for both the favorable-risk (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.79) and the intermediate/poor-risk (HR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.60) group. For objective response rate, a smaller difference was observed between the combination and sunitinib arms in favorable-risk (68.2% vs 49.9%) versus intermediate/poor-risk (59.9% vs 36.5%) groups, while the difference in complete response rate was larger for favorable-risk (15.3% vs 6.0%) versus intermediate/poor-risk (9.1% vs 3.4%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: The frontline IO/TKI combination therapy benefit was shown to be greater in the intermediate/poor-risk group than in the favorable-risk group. The OS benefit observed with IO/TKI for mRCC has yet to be demonstrated for favorable-risk patients; longer follow-up is needed. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with intermediate/poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma derive an overall survival benefit from immuno-oncology/tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations, while data for favorable-risk remain immature.

FDA Approval Summary: Lutetium Lu 177 Vipivotide Tetraxetan for Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

On March 23, 2022, the FDA approved Pluvicto (lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan, also known as 177Lu-PSMA-617) for the treatment of adult patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have been treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibition and taxane-based chemotherapy. The recommended 177Lu-PSMA-617 dose is 7.4 gigabecquerels (GBq; 200 mCi) intravenously every 6 weeks for up to six doses, or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The FDA granted traditional approval based on VISION (NCT03511664), which was a randomized (2:1), multicenter, open-label trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus best standard of care (BSoC; n = 551) or BSoC alone (n = 280) in men with progressive, PSMA-positive mCRPC. Patients were required to have received ≥1 androgen receptor pathway inhibitor, and one or two prior taxane-based chemotherapy regimens. There was a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS), with a median OS of 15.3 months in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus BSoC arm and 11.3 months in the BSoC arm, respectively (HR: 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.74; P < 0.001). The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) occurring at a higher incidence in patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617 were fatigue, dry mouth, nausea, anemia, decreased appetite, and constipation. The most common laboratory abnormalities that worsened from baseline in ≥30% of patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617 were decreased lymphocytes, decreased hemoglobin, decreased leukocytes, decreased platelets, decreased calcium, and decreased sodium. This article summarizes the FDA review of data supporting traditional approval of 177Lu-PSMA-617 for this indication.

Advancing Clinical Trial Design for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent drug development for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), few therapies have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and there remains an unmet clinical need. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) supply issues underscore the importance of developing safe and effective drugs for NMIBC. OBJECTIVE: On November 18-19, 2021, the FDA held a public virtual workshop to discuss NMIBC research needs and potential trial designs for future development of effective therapies. METHODS: Representatives from various disciplines including urologists, oncologists, pathologists, statisticians, basic and translational scientists, and the patient advocacy community participated. The workshop format included invited lectures, panel discussions, and opportunity for audience discussion and comment. RESULTS: In a pre-workshop survey, 92% of urologists surveyed considered the development of alternatives to BCG as a high drug development priority for BCG-naïve high-risk patients. Key topics discussed included definitions of disease states; trial design for BCG-naïve NMIBC, BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ, and BCG-unresponsive papillary carcinoma; strengths and limitations of single-arm trial designs; assessing patient-reported outcomes; and considerations for assessing avoidance of cystectomy as an efficacy measure. CONCLUSIONS: The workshop discussed several important opportunities for trial design refinement in NMIBC. FDA encourages sponsors to meet with the appropriate review division to discuss trial design proposals for NMIBC early in drug development.

FDA Approval Summary: Belzutifan for von Hippel-Lindau Disease-Associated Tumors.

On August 13, 2021, the FDA approved belzutifan (WELIREG, Merck), a first-in-class hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) inhibitor for adult patients with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease who require therapy for associated renal cell carcinoma (RCC), central nervous system (CNS) hemangioblastomas, or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET), not requiring immediate surgery. The FDA granted approval based on the clinically meaningful effects on overall response rate (ORR) observed in patients enrolled in Study MK-6482-004. All 61 patients had VHL-associated RCC; some also had CNS hemangioblastomas and/or pNET. For VHL disease-associated RCC, ORR was 49% [95% confidence interval (CI), 36-62], median duration of response (DoR) was not reached, 56% of responders had DoR ≥12 months, and median time to response was 8 months. Twenty-four patients had measurable CNS hemangioblastomas with an ORR of 63% (95% CI, 41-81), and 12 patients had measurable pNET with an ORR of 83% (95% CI, 52-98). For these tumors, median DoR was not reached, with 73% and 50% of patients having response durations ≥12 months for CNS hemangioblastomas and pNET, respectively. The most common adverse reactions, including laboratory abnormalities, reported in ≥20% were anemia, fatigue, increased creatinine, headache, dizziness, increased glucose, and nausea. Belzutifan can render some hormonal contraceptives ineffective and can cause embryo-fetal harm during pregnancy. This article summarizes the data and the FDA thought process supporting traditional approval of belzutifan for this indication.

Survival outcomes in older men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor inhibitors: a US Food and Drug Administration pooled analysis of patient-level data from three randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the benefit-risk profile of second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors in older men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors in men aged 80 years or older with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: We searched for all randomised controlled clinical trials evaluating second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration before Aug 15, 2020, and pooled data from three trials that met the selection criteria. All three trials enrolled patients who were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, castration-resistant prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 2·0 µg/L or greater, PSA doubling time of 10 months or less, and no evidence of distant metastatic disease on conventional imaging per the investigator's assessment at the time of screening. All patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate without neuroendocrine differentiation or small-cell features. All patients who were randomly assigned to androgen receptor inhibitor or placebo groups in these trials were considered assessable and were included in this pooled analysis. We evaluated the effect of age on metastasis-free survival and overall survival across age groups (<80 years vs ≥80 years) in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were done in patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. FINDINGS: Between Oct 14, 2013, and March 9, 2018, 4117 patients were assigned to androgen receptor inhibitor (apalutamide, enzalutamide, or daralutamide; n=2694) or placebo (n=1423) across three randomised trials. The median follow-up duration for metastasis-free survival was 18 months (IQR 11-26) and for overall survival was 44 months (32-55). In patients aged 80 years or older (n=1023), the estimated median metastasis-free survival was 40 months (95% CI 36-41) in the androgen receptor inhibitor groups and 22 months (18-29) in the placebo groups (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·37 [95% CI 0·28-0·47]), and the median overall survival was 54 months (50-61) versus 49 months (43-58), respectively (adjusted HR 0·79 [0·64-0·98]). In patients younger than 80 years of age (n=3094), the estimated median metastasis-free survival was 41 months (95% CI 36-not estimable [NE]) in the androgen receptor inhibitor groups and 16 months (15-18) in the placebo groups (adjusted HR 0·31 [95% CI 0·27-0·35]), and the median overall survival was 74 months (74-NE) versus 61 months (56-NE), respectively (adjusted HR 0·69 [0·60-0·80]). In patients aged 80 years or older, grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in 371 (55%) of 672 patients in the androgen receptor inhibitor groups and 140 (41%) of 344 patients in the placebo groups, compared with 878 (44%) of 2015 patients in the androgen receptor inhibitor groups and 321 (30%) of 1073 patients in the placebo groups among patients younger than 80 years. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (168 [8%] of 2015 patients aged <80 years and 51 [8%] of 672 patients aged ≥80 years in the androgen receptor inhibitor groups vs 53 [5%] of 1073 patients aged <80 years and 22 [6%] of 344 patients aged ≥80 years in the placebo groups) and fracture (61 [3%] and 36 [5%] in the androgen receptor inhibitor groups vs 15 [1%] and 11 [3%] in the placebo groups). INTERPRETATION: The findings of this pooled analysis support the use of androgen receptor inhibitors in older men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Incorporating geriatric assessment tools in the care of older adults with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer might help clinicians to offer individualised treatment to each patient. FUNDING: None.

Identifying Prostate Surface Antigen Patterns of Change in Patients with Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Abiraterone and Prednisone.

BACKGROUND: Despite treatment with abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AA/P), most patients with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) will develop castration-resistant disease (metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer [mCRPC]). The early identification of who will progress on AA/P is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the role of prostate surface antigen (PSA) kinetics as a predictor of progression in mHSPC patients treated with AA/P. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with mHSPC who initiated androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and AA/P from June 2017 to February 2019 at the Cleveland Clinic were eligible. PSA-mCRPC was defined as a PSA rise at two consecutive time points. Patients were followed until first mCRPC or last contact after AA/P. Patterns of PSA change were evaluated using a longitudinal mixed model at time 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from AA/P initiation. The association between PSA profile at 3 months and PSA-mCRPC was examined using survival analysis. Radiographic progression (Rad-mCRPC) was also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 130 men with follow-up were included. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up time was 15.3 (10.5, 22.5) months. Eighty-two percent were Caucasian (median age 68.5 years); participants had a median (IQR) PSA of 16.8 (5.3, 48.0) ng/mL. Half of the patients had de novo disease, and 46.2% had high-risk disease (61% had a Gleason score ≥ 8, 16% had visceral disease, and 54% had three or more bony lesions). The greatest PSA percentage reduction from baseline after AA/P initiation occurred at the first 3 months (median 98.3%). The reduction at 6-12 months from baseline was small (99.7-100%). Patients without PSA-mCRPC had a significantly greater 3-month reduction of PSA values compared to patients who developed PSA-mCRPC (p interaction = 0.0002). 50.8% of patients were able to achieve a non-detectable PSA (median 13.1 months). PSA-mCRPC (n = 20) was observed from 4 to 24 months after AA/P, with the majority of events occurring within the first 12 months. Patients with PSA < 0.3 ng/mL (12-month PSA-mCRPC-free 94.5% vs. 69.4%, p = 0.0004) or a ≥ 98% reduction (94.9% vs. 68.0%, p = 0.0002) at 3 months had better PSA-mCRPC-free survival compared to their counterparts. Absolute reduction at 3 months was not associated with PSA-mCRPC. Similar PSA patterns were seen in those who had Rad-mCRPC compared to no Rad-mCRPC (p interaction < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The degree of PSA decline at 3 months predicted serologic progression to mCRPC. Those who developed castration-resistant disease had higher PSA and a lower percentage reduction by 3 months. Tracking early PSA pattern changes may alert clinicians to poor treatment effect and potential progression; they should consider frequent PSA measurement and imaging, as well as the initiation of sequential therapy.

On the Shoulders of Giants: The Evolution of Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatment-Cytokines, Targeted Therapy, and Immunotherapy.

The treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has evolved dramatically over the past 30 years, as has a better understanding of the biology of the disease, knowledge of multiple subtypes with distinct molecular abnormalities, and improved comprehension of the perturbed pathways that lead to the development and growth of RCC. This is no longer a monolithic disease, although the majority of tumors are of the clear cell subtype. However, progress is being made in other subtypes as well, as molecular profiles are better understood and as new agents show activity. Immunotherapies remain a major category of treatment, from cytokines to checkpoint inhibitors to ex vivo activated cellular therapy. Antiangiogenesis tyrosine kinase inhibitors are also an important part of the armamentarium. Because these approaches have evolved, we are now in the era of combination therapy using agents of differing mechanisms to try to achieve synergy to increase response rates and create durable responses leading to prolonged survival. Renal cell carcinoma as a tumor is unique in that there has always been a subset of patients who achieve complete responses that last for many years without subsequent treatment. Thus, the goal of further development is to enlarge this subset using new therapeutic approaches and to achieve further durable responses and treatment-free survival.

Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Nonmetastatic Urothelial Carcinoma of Bladder Is Associated With Pathologic Complete Response and Overall Survival.

BACKGROUND: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) have immunosuppressive activity and enhance tumor progression. We hypothesized that lower blood MDSC would correlate with pathologic complete response and better outcomes in nonmetastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Before cystectomy, blood MDSC were measured in whole blood (WB) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells using flow cytometry. MDSC were defined as CD33+/HLA-DR-. MDSC subtypes were polymorphonuclear MDSC (CD15+/CD14-), monocytic (M)-MDSC (CD15-/CD14+), and uncommitted (UnC) MDSC (CD15-/CD14-). The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare MDSC between pathologic complete response groups. The optimal cutoff points for MDSC were identified using recursive partitioning analysis with cross-validation. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to associate MDSC and other clinical factors with recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Overall, 109 patients were included: 86% men with median (range) age of 67 (30-88) years, 76% with pure UC, 29% intravesical therapy, and 41% neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-one patients (19%) had pT0N0 and 23 (24%) < pT2N0. Median (range) follow-up time was 17.4 (0.4-42.4) months. Total MDSC and polymorphonuclear MDSC percentage in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was significantly lower in patients with pT0N0 disease (P = .03). One- and 2-year OS rates were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90-99) and 83% (95% CI, 75-93), respectively. In the multivariate Cox model after adjusting for age and gender, patients with higher WB M-MDSC and UnC-MDSC had shorter OS (optimal cutoff points by recursive partitioning analysis, hazard ratio = 7.5 [95% CI, 2.5-22.8], P = .0004; hazard ratio = 3.4 [95% CI, 1.0-11.0], P = .046, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with nonmetastatic UC of bladder, higher WB M-MDSC and UnC-MDSC before cystectomy had negative prognostic value. Prospective validation is warranted.

Diagnostic and therapeutic splenectomy for splenic lymphomas: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the use of splenectomy, chemotherapy, and subsequent overall survival (OS) in contemporary patients with splenic lymphomas. METHODS: We analyzed records of 6450 patients with various splenic lymphomas recorded in the National Cancer Data Base (2004-2013). Survival was compared using Mantel-Byer test to account for guarantee-time bias, stratified by age, sex, comorbidities, and lymphoma stage. RESULTS: Splenectomy rate was overall 58%, and varied from 49% in splenic marginal zone (SMZL) to 77% in follicular lymphoma (FL). It significantly decreased across all histologies over time (overall from 69% in 2004, to 44% in 2013). Thirty-day mortality after splenectomy was 4%. Chemotherapy use varied from 40% in FL to 76% in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but increased significantly only for SMZL and T-cell lymphomas over time. Overall, 57% of splenectomies were performed as diagnostic procedures, which was significantly less common in academic hospitals (p < 0.0001). Following a diagnostic splenectomy, chemotherapy was not administered to 29% of patients with DLBCL, 49% with mantle cell, and 42% with T-cell lymphomas. Median OS ranged from 12.4 years for FL to 1.0 year for T-cell lymphomas. We found no association between performance of splenectomy and OS across all histologies. Patients with DLBCL who did not receive chemotherapy after a diagnostic splenectomy had significantly worse OS (p = 0.001). The association between post-splenectomy chemotherapy and OS was not observed in FL or SMZL. CONCLUSION: many splenic lymphomas may be treated without surgery, but a high proportion of diagnostic splenectomies indicates an ongoing need for less invasive diagnostic modalities.

HIF Inhibitors: Status of Current Clinical Development.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, the importance of the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) pathway in tumorigenesis and cancer treatment outcomes will be discussed. The outcomes of phase II and III clinical trials of direct HIF inhibitors in the treatment of cancer will be reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: The HIF signaling pathway is activated by tumor-induced hypoxia or by inactivating mutations of the VHL gene. HIF is a transcription factor which regulates the expression of genes involved in adjusting mechanisms to hypoxia such as angiogenesis or apoptosis as well as tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. The HIF pathway has a key role in development of resistance to different treatment modalities and higher expression of the HIF molecule is associated with poor prognosis. Clinical studies of the HIF inhibitors in patients with advanced/refractory cancers suggest benefit and warrant further studies of the HIF inhibitors either as a single agent or in combination with other therapeutic agents.

Human immunodeficiency virus-associated lymphomas in the antiretroviral therapy era: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

BACKGROUND: Antiviral therapy has altered the prognosis of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), but patterns of lymphoma-directed therapy in the community are unknown. METHODS: The authors analyzed the National Cancer Data Base records of 10,769 patients who were diagnosed with HIV-associated lymphoma from 2004 through 2012. Changes in clinical characteristics and chemotherapy delivery over time were evaluated. Factors that were associated with not receiving chemotherapy were studied using multivariable logistic regression, reporting odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The proportion of black or Hispanic patients with HIV-associated NHL increased from 41% in 2004 to 55% in 2012 (P < .0001). Chemotherapy was received by 81% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 90% of those with Burkitt lymphoma, 61% of those with primary effusion lymphoma (PEL), and 35% of those with primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL). Between 2004 and 2012, this proportion increased only for patients with PCNSL (P < .00001). Chemotherapy was less likely to be received by patients who were older, black, or without private insurance. It was delivered more frequently in hospitals designated as academic (OR for nonreceipt, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92) or in hospitals that had ≥3 HIV-positive cases per year (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.86). Survival improved in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (P = .007), Burkitt lymphoma (P = .0002), and PCNSL (P = .019), but not in those with PEL (P = .94). Receipt of chemotherapy in patients with PEL was not associated with better survival. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in chemotherapy delivery need attention, because a majority of HIV-positive patients with NHL in the United States are now black or Hispanic. Higher volume centers were associated with an increased likelihood of chemotherapy administration. Survival gains in patients with PCNSL parallel an increase in chemotherapy use, supporting its role in therapy. [See Editorial on pages 000-000, this issue.] Cancer 2016. © 2016 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2016;122:2689-2697. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Therapy and outcomes of primary central nervous system lymphoma in the United States: analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Although the role of radiation therapy and chemotherapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has evolved considerably over the past decade, the application of treatment modalities in the community has not been evaluated. We analyzed the use of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and associated overall survival, among 9165 HIV-negative PCSNL cases reported to the US National Cancer Database in 2004-2013. During this time, the proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy significantly increased from 65.6% to 78.8% (P for trend <.0001), whereas the proportion receiving radiation therapy decreased from 37.6% to 18.8% (P < .0001). Adjusting for the varying distribution of clinical and sociodemographic characteristics by type of treating facility, the risk of not receiving chemotherapy was significantly lower in academic/research cancer programs compared with community programs (adjusted relative risk, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.76; P < .0001). Furthermore, omission of chemotherapy was associated with increasing age, comorbidities, black race, and indicators of poor socioeconomic status. Overall survival at 3 years was 37.7% (95% CI, 36.6-38.8) and ranged from 14.1% for patients treated with radiation therapy alone to 51.8% for those who received multiagent chemotherapy. There was evidence of improved survival over time (P for trend =.0002). The disparities in application of chemotherapy for PCNSL underscore the need to provide access to expert management for this rare disease and improve safe delivery of systemic treatment in the community setting, where most older patients receive their care.