Psychosocial stress, sleep quality and interest in mind-body integrative health sleep intervention among urban adolescents in the school-based health setting.

BACKGROUND: Mind-body integrative health (MBIH) interventions to improve adolescent sleep are lacking. The study characterized sleep quality and bedtime-related psychosocial stressors among urban minority adolescents, explored associations between demographics factors, stressors and sleep quality, and gauged interest in a MBIH sleep intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 167 school-based health center (SBHC) patients (mean age = 16.3; 64 % female; 68 % Latino) participated in a needs assessment as part of a quality improvement project. They reported bedtime-related psychosocial stressors using items from the Adolescent Sleep Hygiene Scale (ASHS), sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and interest in a MBIH-based sleep intervention. Chi-square and logistic regression examined associations between demographics, stressors, sleep quality, and interest in the intervention. RESULTS: 67 % had poor sleep quality. Females, compared to males, had 2.23 higher odds (95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.12, 4.42) of having poor sleep quality. Nearly 80 % experienced bedtime-related stressors (25 % experienced one stressor, 17 % two stressors and 37 % three or more stressors); relative to those reporting no stressors, those reporting 3+ stressors had 3.15 higher odds (95 % CI: 1.27, 7.84) of having poor sleep quality. Most (77 %) reported they would participate in an SBHC-based intervention that utilized MBIH modalities preferring both one-on-one and group sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Urban, predominantly Hispanic and Black, SBHC adolescent patients have poor sleep quality and report bedtime-related psychosocial stressors. Their interest in MBIH interventions to address sleep problems represents a unique opportunity for practitioners and complementary therapists to offer MBIH interventions to a population at high-risk for poor sleep quality.

"If You Don't Ask, I'm Not Going to Tell You": Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Inform Pregnancy Intention Screening Processes for Black and Latina Women in Primary Care.

BACKGROUND: Public health and medical professional organizations recommend screening women of reproductive age for pregnancy intention (PI) routinely in primary care. Existing PI screening tools may not address the complexity of intentions for women of color or lower socioeconomic status or be well-suited to primary care settings. This study sought to inform recommendations for carrying out PI screening meaningfully in primary care settings. METHODS: This community-based participatory research project united staff from a research institution, community health organization, and federally qualified health center in a predominantly Latina community in New York City. The Community Advisory Board members designed the research question, developed qualitative interview guides, and conducted in-depth interviews with 30 English- and Spanish-speaking female federally qualified health center patients ages 15 to 49. Community Advisory Board members developed an initial codebook using an inductive approach and refined themes throughout the coding process. After coding, Community Advisory Board members created a conceptual map representing relationships between key themes, and generated data-informed recommendations for PI screening practices that are relevant and feasible in the community context. RESULTS: Participants expressed a range of experiences with PI screening processes, depending on medical histories, attitudes, norms, and perceived benefits of screening. Three central themes emerged through frequency of occurrence, consistency in content, and relevance as reflected in concept mapping: agency, judgment and shame, and expertise versus authority. Recommendations included specific strategies and wording providers could use to explain the rationale and context for discussing PI. CONCLUSIONS: Future work should examine the experience and effectiveness of implementing these community-based participatory research-derived recommendations in primary care.

Building Community Capacity for Qualitative Research to Improve Pregnancy Intention Screening.

BACKGROUND: Community-based participatory research (CBPR), with an emphasis on co-learning and collaboration, holds promise for exploring the pregnancy intention (PI) screening needs of Latina patients and their health care providers. We describe a CBPR partnership exploring PI screening processes at a federally qualified health center in New York City, and lessons learned related to community participation, training, and collaboration between partners. METHODS: Stakeholders convened a community advisory board (CAB) to carry out CBPR. The CAB administered a biannual process evaluation to assess members' experiences with the project. RESULTS: Despite challenges, the CAB prioritized community participation, training, and collaboration. At three time points, members reported gaining research skills (93%, 100%, 100%), and believing in the project's potential to improve PI screening (100%, 100%, 100%). CONCLUSIONS: Building capacity for CBPR requires providing iterative training, navigating discrepancies between CAB members' interests and training needs, facilitating the meaningful participation of members with limited time and/or technical skills, and ensuring an equitable division of labor.

Primary care providers' responses to pregnancy intention screening challenges: community-based participatory research at an urban community health centre.

BACKGROUND: Incorporating pregnancy intention screening into primary care to address unmet preconception and contraception needs may improve delivery of family planning services. A notable research gap exists regarding providers' experiences conducting this screening in primary care. OBJECTIVE: To explore primary care providers' perceived challenges in conducting pregnancy intention screening with women of reproductive age and to identify strategies to discuss this in primary care settings. METHODS: This qualitative study emerged from a 2017 community-based participatory research project. We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 10 primary care providers who care for women of reproductive age at an urban federally qualified health centre. Analysis consisted of interview debriefing, transcript coding and content analysis with the Community Advisory Board. RESULTS: Across departments, respondents acknowledged difficulties conducting pregnancy intention screening and identified strategies for working with patients' individual readiness to discuss pregnancy intention. Strategies included: linking patients' health concerns with sexual and reproductive health, applying a shared decision-making model to all patient-provider interactions, practicing goal setting and motivational interviewing, fostering non-judgmental relationships and introducing pregnancy intention in one visit but following up at later times when more relevant for patients. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist for health centres to address pregnancy intention screening challenges, such as implementing routine screening and waiting room tools to foster provider and patient agency and sharing best practices with providers across departments by facilitating comprehensive training and periodic check-ins. Exploring providers' experiences may assist health centres in improving pregnancy intention screening in the primary care setting.

Individual and Neighborhood Factors Associated with Undiagnosed Asthma in a Large Cohort of Urban Adolescents.

Undiagnosed asthma adds to the burden of asthma and is an especially significant public health concern among urban adolescents. While much is known about individual-level demographic and neighborhood-level factors that characterize those with diagnosed asthma, limited data exist regarding these factors and undiagnosed asthma. This observational study evaluated associations between undiagnosed asthma and individual and neighborhood factors among a large cohort of urban adolescents. We analyzed data from 10,295 New York City adolescents who reported on asthma symptoms and diagnosis; a subset (n = 6220) provided addresses that we were able to geocode into US Census tracts. Multivariable regression models estimated associations between undiagnosed asthma status and individual-level variables. Hierarchical linear modeling estimated associations between undiagnosed asthma status and neighborhood-level variables. Undiagnosed asthma prevalence was 20.2%. Females had higher odds of being undiagnosed (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.13-1.37). Compared to White, non-Hispanic adolescents, Asian-Americans had higher risk of being undiagnosed (AOR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.01-1.95); Latinos (AOR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.45-0.83); and African-Americans/Blacks (AOR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.52-0.87) had lower risk; Latinos and African-Americans/Blacks did not differ significantly. Living in a neighborhood with a lower concentration of Latinos relative to White non-Latinos was associated with lower risk of being undiagnosed (AOR = 0.66; CI = 0.43-0.95). Living in a neighborhood with health care provider shortages was associated with lower risk of being undiagnosed (AOR = 0.80; 95% CI =0.69-0.93). Public health campaigns to educate adolescents and their caregivers about undiagnosed asthma, as well as education for health care providers to screen adolescent patients for asthma, are warranted.