Metabolic changes during gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy for prostate cancer: differences from the classic metabolic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: In men with prostate cancer, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists increase fat mass, decrease insulin sensitivity, and increase triglycerides, features that are shared with metabolic syndrome. To the authors' knowledge, however, less is known regarding the effects of GnRH agonists on other attributes of the metabolic syndrome. METHODS: In an open-label prospective study, 26 men with recurrent or locally advanced prostate cancer were treated with leuprolide for 12 months. Outcomes included changes in blood pressure, body composition, lipids, adipocytokines, and C-reactive protein. RESULTS: The mean weight, body mass index, and waist circumference increased significantly from baseline to Month 12 (P < .001 for each comparison). Fat mass increased by 11.2% +/- 1.5% (P < .001) and the percentage lean body mass decreased by 3.6% +/- 0.5% (P < .001). The total abdominal fat area increased by 16.5% +/- 2.6% (P < .001), with the accumulation of subcutaneous fat accounting for 94% of the observed increase. The waist-to-hip ratio and blood pressure did not change significantly. Serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations increased significantly (P = .002). Serum adiponectin levels increased by 36.4 +/- 5.9% from baseline to Month 3 and remained significantly elevated through Month 12 (P < .001). Resistin and C-reactive protein levels did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The term metabolic syndrome does not appear to adequately describe the effects of GnRH agonists in men with prostate cancer. In contrast to the metabolic syndrome, GnRH agonists increase subcutaneous fat mass, HDL cholesterol, and adiponectin, and do not alter the waist-to-hip ratio, blood pressure, or C-reactive protein level.

Adipocytokines, obesity, and insulin resistance during combined androgen blockade for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists increase fat mass, decrease insulin sensitivity, and increase serum triglycerides. To better characterize the metabolic effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment, we prospectively evaluated the changes in body composition, insulin sensitivity, and levels of adiponectin, resistin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1). We also assessed the relationships among changes in adipocytokines, body composition, and insulin sensitivity. METHODS: In this prospective, 12-week study, 25 nondiabetic men with locally advanced or recurrent prostate cancer and no radiographic evidence of metastases were treated with leuprolide depot and bicalutamide. The outcomes studied included changes from baseline to week 12 in body composition, insulin sensitivity, and levels of adiponectin, resistin, CRP, and PAI-1. RESULTS: The mean +/- standard error percentage of fat body mass increased by 4.3% +/- 1.3% from baseline to week 12 (P = 0.002). The insulin sensitivity index decreased by 12.9% +/- 7.6% (P = 0.02). The serum adiponectin levels increased by 37.4% +/- 7.2% from baseline to week 12 (P <0.001). In contrast, the resistin, CRP, and PAI-1 levels did not change significantly. Changes in body composition tended to be associated with changes in adiponectin, but not insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Combined androgen blockade with leuprolide and bicalutamide significantly increased fat mass and adiponectin levels and decreased insulin sensitivity but did not alter the resistin, CRP, or PAI-1 levels. This pattern of metabolic changes appears distinct from the classic metabolic syndrome.

Randomized controlled trial of annual zoledronic acid to prevent gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-induced bone loss in men with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists decrease bone mineral density (BMD) and increase fracture risk in men with prostate cancer. Annual zoledronic acid increases BMD in postmenopausal women, but its efficacy in hypogonadal men is not known. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a 12-month study, 40 men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer who were receiving a GnRH agonist and had T scores more than -2.5 were randomly assigned to zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously on day 1 only) or placebo. BMD of the posteroanterior lumbar spine and proximal femur were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SE) BMD of the posteroanterior lumbar spine decreased by 3.1% +/- 1.0% in men assigned to placebo and increased by 4.0% +/- 1.0% in men assigned to zoledronic acid (P < .001). BMD of the total hip decreased by 1.9% +/- 0.7% in men assigned to placebo and increased by 0.7% +/- 0.5% in men assigned to zoledronic acid (P = .004). Similar between-group differences were observed for the femoral neck and trochanter. Serum N-telopeptide, a marker of osteoclast activity, decreased significantly after zoledronic acid treatment. CONCLUSION: In men receiving a GnRH agonist, a single treatment with zoledronic acid significantly increased BMD and durably suppressed serum N-telopeptide levels for 12 months. Annual zoledronic acid may be a convenient and effective strategy to prevent bone loss in hypogonadal men.

Raloxifene to prevent gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-induced bone loss in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

GnRH agonists decrease bone mineral density and increase fracture risk in men with prostate cancer. Raloxifene increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women, but its efficacy in hypogonadal men is not known. In a 12-month open-label study, men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer (n = 48) who were receiving a GnRH agonist were assigned randomly to raloxifene (60 mg/d) or no raloxifene. Bone mineral densities of the posteroanterior lumbar spine and proximal femur were measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Mean (+/-se) bone mineral density of the posteroanterior lumbar spine increased by 1.0 +/- 0.9% in men treated with raloxifene and decreased by 1.0 +/- 0.6% in men who did not receive raloxifene (P = 0.07). Bone mineral density of the total hip increased by 1.1 +/- 0.4% in men treated with raloxifene and decreased by 2.6 +/- 0.7% in men who did not receive raloxifene (P < 0.001). Similar between-group differences were observed in the femoral neck (P = 0.06) and trochanter (P < 0.001). In men receiving a GnRH agonist, raloxifene significantly increases bone mineral density of the hip and tends to increase bone mineral density of the spine.

High-dose calcitriol, zoledronate, and dexamethasone for the treatment of progressive prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical and clinical data have suggested that high-dose calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol) has activity against prostate carcinoma. Pulse-dosed calcitriol and dexamethasone may maximize tolerability and efficacy. The authors examined the toxicity of pulse-dosed calcitriol with zoledronate and with the addition of dexamethasone at the time of disease progression. METHODS: Patients with progressive prostate carcinoma were eligible for the current study. In cohorts of 3-6 patients, calcitriol was administered for 3 consecutive days per week, starting at a dose of 4 microg per day. Doses were escalated to 30 microg per day. Intravenous zoledronate (4 mg) was administered monthly. Dexamethasone could be added to the regimen at disease progression. Toxicities, markers of bone turnover, plasma calcitriol levels, and clinical outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were treated in cohorts that were defined by the calcitriol dose administered (4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 20, 24, or 30 microg). Seven patients received dexamethasone. Three patients had their doses reduced due to calcium-related laboratory findings. Patients tolerated therapy well, even in the 30 microg cohort; therefore, a maximum tolerated dose was not defined. Peak plasma levels observed in the 24 microg and 30 microg cohorts ranged from 391 to 968 pg/mL. Minimal antitumor effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Calcitriol was well tolerated at doses up to and including 30 microg 3 times per week in combination with intravenous zoledronate 4 mg monthly, with or without dexamethasone, in patients with progressive prostate carcinoma. Peak plasma levels in the 24 microg and 30 microg cohorts were greater than the levels associated with antitumor effects preclinically. Due to the cumbersome dosing schedule and the lack of significant activity observed, Phase II trials of this regimen are not planned.

Dose escalation study of intravenous estramustine phosphate in combination with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose is to determine a safe weekly dose of i.v. estramustine phosphate (EMP) to combine with weekly paclitaxel and monthly carboplatin in patients with advanced prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced prostate cancer (castrate and noncastrate) were administered escalating doses of weekly 1-h infusion of i.v. EMP (500-1000-1500 mg/m(2)) in combination with weekly paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2) over 1 h) and i.v. carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/ml-min every 4 weeks). Four weeks of therapy were considered one cycle. In the first three cohorts, EMP was given i.v. 3 h before paclitaxel. Cohorts 4 and 5 reversed the administration order: EMP (doses 1000-1500 mg/m(2)) was given immediately after the end of paclitaxel infusion. Plasma levels of EMP and its metabolites, estramustine and estromustine, were monitored at time 0, at 120 min, and approximately at 20, 21, and 168 h from the start of EMP infusion. Paclitaxel concentrations were determined at basal (0), 30, 60, 90, and 120 min and 18 h after the start of paclitaxel infusion, and a concentration-time curve was estimated. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed in cycles 1 and 2 during the first week of therapy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were entered on the initial three dose levels (cohorts 1-3). Dose-limiting transient hepatic toxicity was encountered in cohort 3 (EMP = 1500 mg/m(2)). An additional 13 patients were treated with paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2)) first, followed by i.v. EMP at 1000 mg/m(2) (cohort 4), and 1500 mg/m(2) (cohort 5). No dose-limiting toxicities were seen, and cohort 5 was determined safe for Phase II studies. Thromboembolic events were observed in 9% of patients (no prophylactic coumadin was used). Plasma concentrations of EMP and metabolites increased proportionally with dose. In all cohorts, there was a slight decrease in EMP and estramustine plasma concentrations between cycles 1 and 2. Although not significant, higher levels of estromustine at cycle 2 were observed in comparison to cycle 1. Decreased clearance of paclitaxel leading to higher than expected paclitaxel plasma concentrations was observed during the first cycle of therapy. Paclitaxel plasma concentrations were lower during cycle 2. In 17 patients with androgen-independent disease, 59% had >/=50% posttherapy decline in PSA and 22% showed measurable disease regression. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen of weekly i.v. EMP in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin can be safely administered with hepatic toxicity being transient and reversible. Pharmacokinetic results suggest that EMP competitively inhibits the biotransformation of paclitaxel after the first administration. This effect is counterbalanced, after repeated administrations, by a possible induction of the metabolic system caused by EMP. Phase II testing is ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of this combination.

Cross-sectional study of bone turnover during bicalutamide monotherapy for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Monotherapy with bicalutamide increases serum concentrations of testosterone and estradiol. Because estrogens play an important role in male bone metabolism, bicalutamide monotherapy may have fewer adverse effects on bone than androgen-deprivation therapy with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we compared gonadal steroid levels and biochemical markers of bone turnover among three groups of men with prostate cancer: hormone-naive men, men treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, and men receiving bicalutamide monotherapy. Men with bone metastases or metabolic bone disease were excluded. Fifty-five eligible subjects were included in the analyses. RESULTS: Serum testosterone and estradiol concentrations were lower in men treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist than in hormone-naive men or men receiving bicalutamide monotherapy (P <0.001 for each comparison). Serum testosterone and estradiol concentrations were higher in men receiving bicalutamide monotherapy than in the hormone-naive men (P <0.001). The mean serum urinary excretion of deoxypyridinoline, urinary excretion of N-telopeptide, and serum osteocalcin were significantly higher in men treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist than in the other groups (P <0.05 for each comparison). In contrast, biochemical markers of bone turnover were similar for hormone-naive men and men receiving bicalutamide monotherapy (P >0.05 for each comparison). CONCLUSIONS: Biochemical markers of bone turnover are elevated in men receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment but not in men receiving bicalutamide monotherapy. These observations suggest that bicalutamide monotherapy may maintain bone mineral density and prevent fractures.

Measurement of body fat by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioimpedance analysis in men with prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to determine the percentage of body fat (%BF) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) using a standard adult equation and BIA using a standard geriatric equation in a population of older men with prostate cancer and to compare the results from these different methods. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 38 men with locally advanced, node-positive, or recurrent prostate cancer and no history of androgen-deprivation therapy. Body composition was evaluated by DXA with the use of a Hologic 4500A densitometer and BIA. BIA %BF was calculated by using standard equations developed for adult and geriatric populations. RESULTS: %BF by DXA, BIA with the standard adult equation, BIA with the standard geriatric equation, and BIA with the age-appropriate equation were 26.7 +/- 5.3%, 22.5 +/- 5.6%, 38.2 +/- 6.9%, and 35.4 +/- 9.6%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between %BF by DXA and all BIA estimates. By using the methods described by Bland and Altman (Lancet 1986;1(8476):307), the standard adult equation showed the least bias and variability. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of men with prostate cancer, BIA with the standard adult equation provided a reasonable estimate of %BF compared with DXA, although the differences were statistically significant. BIA with the standard geriatric equation, however, markedly overestimated %BF compared with DXA, even when its use was restricted to elderly men.

Changes in body composition during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of initial treatment with a GnRH agonist on body composition in asymptomatic men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Forty men with locally advanced, node-positive or biochemically recurrent prostate cancer, no radiographic evidence of metastases, and no prior androgen deprivation therapy were treated with leuprolide 3-month depot 22.5 mg im every 12 wk for 48 wk. The main outcome measures were percentage changes in weight, percentage fat body mass, percentage lean body mass, fat distribution, and muscle size after 48 wk. Thirty-two subjects were evaluable. Serum T concentrations decreased by 96.3% plus or minus 0.4% (P < 0.001). Weight increased by 2.4% plus or minus 0.8% (P = 0.005). Percentage fat body mass increased by 9.4% plus or minus 1.7% (P < 0.001), and percentage lean body mass decreased by 2.7% plus or minus 0.5% (P < 0.001). Cross-sectional areas of the abdomen and abdominal sc fat increased by 3.9% plus or minus 1.2% (P = 0.003) and 11.1% plus or minus 3.4% (P = 0.003), respectively. In contrast, the cross-sectional area of intraabdominal fat did not change significantly (P = 0.94). Cross-sectional paraspinal muscle area decreased by 3.2% plus or minus 1.3% (P = 0.02). GnRH agonists increase weight and percentage fat body mass and decrease percentage lean body mass and muscle size in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Increased fatness resulted primarily from accumulation of sc rather than intraabdominal adipose tissue.