The multidisciplinary audit in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) colorectal surgery: experience in a single Italian center.

BACKGROUND: Current literature underlines the role of periodical feed-back to improve Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) path adherence during implementation program. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical impact of an audit program in an ERAS path. METHODS: All elective patients submitted to elective colorectal surgery from November 2018 to January 2020 in our Institution were considered. The sample was divided into two study groups: group 1, including patients enrolled in the first sixth months of ERAS program until the first audit; group 2, patients enrolled in a time period of a six months after the first audit. RESULTS: The final analysis included 46 patients in group 1 and 64 in group 2. Group 2 showed a higher ASA Score (P<0.03), a higher prevalence of right hemicolectomy, and a lower prevalence of left hemicolectomy and anterior rectum resection (RAR) (P<0.016). Group 2 also had a lower prevalence of anastomotic leakage (AL) (P<0.004). Intraoperative normothermia (T>36 C°) in this group was achieved in a larger number of patients in comparison with group 1 (39% vs. 19.5%) (P<0.01). Group 2 experienced a higher average body temperature at admission in recovery room (RR) when compared to Group 1 (35.8 vs. 35.1 C°, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Audit program may represent a useful tool to promote advantageous changes in clinical practice and to favor a better compliance to ERAS program.

The Role of the Recovery Room in Improving Adherence During an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Implementation Program for Colorectal Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of thisstudy was to evaluate the clinical impact of the Recovery Room (RR) in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway in colorectal surgery. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective study. METHODS: From November 2019 until September 2021, a total of 149 consecutive patients that underwent to colon-rectal surgery were enrolled. The patients were divided into two study groups: RR Group if admitted to RR after surgery, and no-Recovery Room (NRR) Group if monitored directly on the ward, bypassing the RR. The postoperative ERAS items adherence was assessed in the two study groups. FINDINGS: Final analysis included 119 patients in the RR Group and 30 patients in NRR Group. Patients that started clear liquid oral intake within two hours postoperatively were 118 in the RR group and 19 in the NRR group (99.1% vs 63.3%, P < .001). A total of 98 patients and 18 patients were mobilized on day 0 in the RR group and in NRR group, respectively (84.4% vs 15.5%, P < .05). In the RR group, postoperative adherence to the ERAS protocol components was higher in comparison with the NRR group (P < .003); adherence to the all protocol components was also higher (P < .004). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing colorectal surgery admitted to RR after surgery, the RR nurse guaranteed effective patient assistance and ensured appropriate compliance to the postoperative ERAS items.

Diathermy haemorrhoidectomy: reasons for a therapeutic choice.

BACKGROUND: Diathermy haemorrhoidectomy is an effective technique for the management of 2nd, 3rd and 4th degree haemorrhoids. The anal cushions are excised by use of diathermy without ligature of the vascular pedicles. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of this technique. METHODS: Between September 1999 and September 2003, 84 patients with 2nd, 3rd, and 4th degree haemorrhoids underwent diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Patients were discharged the same day or the day after. All the patients were asked to complete two questionnaires one on the level of pain they experienced and the other on their expectation of pain. Patients were followed-up for 1 to 4 years (range 12-48 months, mean 20.5). RESULTS: The average pain severity score on a visual analogue scale (0-10) was 3.06 +/- 0.38 and consistently lower than expected. The majority of patients returned to their usual daily activities within 4 days and all of them returned to work within 11 days. A mild residual secretion persisted for 4 to 5 weeks. None of our patients experienced postoperative haemorrhage, complete stenosis or sphincteric disturbances. CONCLUSIONS: Diathermy haemorrhoidectomy appears to be a safe, low cost and effective technique for the treatment of haemorrhoids. It is well tolerated by patients.

Plasma levels of t-PA and PAI-1 correlate with the formation of experimental post-surgical peritoneal adhesions.

This study has evaluated whether systemic changes of plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) parallel the adhesions development and whether they could be used as predictors of adhesion risk. This has been studied in an animal model of post-surgical peritoneal adhesion by monitoring for 10 days the plasma and tissue levels of t-PA and PAI-1. The results showed that both tissular and plasmatic levels of t-PA were decreased in concomitance with the development of peritoneal adhesions. In contrast, PAI-1 was found increased into the tissue and into the plasma samples of the rats taken at 5 and 10 days time points. Inflammatory mediators such as ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and IL-6 within the peritoneal lavage fluid also correlated with the adhesion formation process. In conclusion, post-surgical peritoneal adhesions provide alterations of local inflammatory components and local and systemic fibrinolytic components, possibly with PAI-1 quenching t-PA. This may have potential for the identification of high-risk patients.

Iatrogenic splenic injuries.

Inadvertent intraoperative injuries to the spleen by the surgical team represent an underestimated complication of many abdominal procedures. Surgical reports often lack the necessary details and frequently a clear justification as why a splenectomy was indicated is not provided. The wide variability of the incidence reported in literature makes it is difficult to evaluate the morbidity and mortality associated to these injuries and to assess the early and late consequences of this complication, although it is still possible to infer some of the reasons for these inconsistencies and to roughly estimate both clinical and socio-economical effects of this injury. Given the degree of uncertainty on the incidence of iatrogenic and traumatic splenic injuries and on the immediate and long-term sequelae suffered by asplenic patients, we thought that a multicentric prospective study was warranted. We are therefore announcing the start of a study involving several Institutions within the Regione Campania, aimed at obtaining an unbiased estimate of the incidence of these injuries, together with the extent and severity of their long-term complications. We also aim to help promoting a more effective prevention.