Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Pathologica ; 103(6): 325-30, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22558889

ABSTRACT

Data on 2436 primary breast carcinomas diagnosed between 1992 and 2006 were collected to evaluate the rate of frozen section procedures performed over time. Frozen section procedures performed to evaluate resection margins for conservative surgery or sentinel node status were excluded. Over time, there was a decrease in the use of frozen sections indistinctly extended to all pT cancer categories. The rate of cancers diagnosed with frozen sections was 51.2% in 1999, and 0% in 2005-2006. In the same period, the adoption of cytology and core biopsy for breast cancer diagnosis increased from 40% in 1992 to more than 90% since 1999. In an audited diagnostic activity on breast pathology, the routine use of frozen sections on primary lesions was considered inappropriate, particularly in assessment of clinically non-palpable lesions, and should be limited to cases with inadequate pre-surgical sampling.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Frozen Sections/statistics & numerical data , Frozen Sections/trends , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging
2.
Radiol Med ; 112(2): 287-303, 2007 Mar.
Article in English, Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17361369

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the role of real-time reading in the mammography screening programme carried out at the Hospital of Marzana, Verona, Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the 5-year period 1999-2004, 54,472 women attended the screening programme (32,291 first calls: unadjusted uptake 41.4%, adjusted uptake 50.3%; 21,551 2- year routine recalls: unadjusted uptake 86.4%, adjusted uptake 89.9%). Further diagnostic investigations [(FDI), imaging and cytohistological] were performed immediately after real-time reading of the screening mammograms (FDI rate among first calls 10.9%; FDI rate among 2-year recalls 5.4%). Overall, cytohistological FDI were requested in 27% of imaging FDI, with a clear prevalence of cytological [fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) 87%] over histological procedures [core needle biopsy (CNB) 11%; vacuum aspiration biopsy (VAB) 2%]. RESULTS: Imaging FDI proved to be conclusive in 73%. Cytohistological FDI led to the use of surgical biopsy (SB) in 39.5% (ratio between benign and malignant SB: 0.19/first calls, 0.14/2-year recalls). There were a total of 427 screen-detected breast cancers (BC), with a very good breast cancer detection rate (BCDR/first calls 9.7 per thousand; BCDR/2-year recalls 5.1 per thousand). In the 427 screen-detected BC, the incidence of pTis, pT1a,b cancers was 59.6% (diagnostic anticipation); the incidence of pN0 cancers was 61.2%; the incidence of conservative surgical procedures was 78.6%. In interval cancers, the false negative rate was 8.3% only, whereas the proportional incidence was very low indeed (14% first year; 38% second year). CONCLUSIONS: The high sensitivity exhibited by the Marzana mammography screening programme suggests that the value of real-time reading should be validated by other programmes adopting a similar approach.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mammography/methods , Biopsy , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Italy , Mass Screening/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...