PErsonalized TReatment for Endometrial Carcinoma (PETREC): study design and methods of a prospective Finnish multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial carcinomas can be classified into four molecular subgroups - mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), p53 abnormal (p53abn), polymerase-ϵ (POLE) ultramutated, and 'no specific molecular profile' (NSMP). Retrospective data imply that the response to adjuvant therapies may depend on the molecular subgroup. These findings emphasize the need for adjuvant therapy trials where patients are randomized to treatment arms separately within each molecular subgroup. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The PErsonalized TReatment for Endometrial Carcinoma (PETREC) trial clarifies the value of molecular classification in the determination of adjuvant therapies of high-intermediate risk and early-stage high-risk endometrial carcinoma. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Compared with vaginal brachytherapy, the utilization of whole pelvic radiotherapy may result in improved outcomes for either MMRd or NSMP high-intermediate risk carcinomas. Early-stage high-risk p53abn and nonendometrioid carcinomas are postulated to gain benefits from chemoradiotherapy, as opposed to chemotherapy alone. POLE ultramutated carcinomas harboring high-intermediate or high-risk clinicopathologic features are speculated to have favorable prognosis without any adjuvant therapy. TRIAL DESIGN: This prospective, multicenter, phase 3 trial compares the efficacy of vaginal brachytherapy vs whole pelvic radiotherapy in high-intermediate risk MMRd and NSMP molecular subgroups, and chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy in early-stage high-risk p53abn subtype and nonendometrioid carcinomas. Eligible women who consent to participation in the trial are randomly allocated (1:1) to treatment arms. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Women with stages I-II molecular integrated high-intermediate risk or high-risk endometrial carcinoma will be included. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The primary endpoint is the 5 year cumulative incidence of disease recurrence. SAMPLE SIZE: A total sample size of 294 patients (49 subjects in each treatment arm of the three subgroups intended for randomization) was estimated to be sufficient. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: Patient recruitment will be completed in 2025, and follow-up will be completed in 2030. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05655260.

Effects of letrozole on serum estradiol and estrone in postmenopausal breast cancer patients and tolerability of treatment: a prospective trial using a highly sensitive LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) method for estrogen measurement.

PURPOSE: To analyze serum estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1) during letrozole treatment and their association to Quality of Life (QoL) and side-effects. METHODS: Postmenopausal breast cancer patients starting adjuvant letrozole were eligible. Serum samples were taken at baseline, three, and 12 months. E2 and FSH were measured with routine chemiluminescent immunoassays. E2 and E1 were analyzed after trial completion with a highly sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method (LC-MS/MS) with lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) of 5 pmol/L. QoL was measured at baseline and at 12 months with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 and the Women's Health questionnaires, and menopause-related symptoms with the modified Kupperman Index. RESULTS: Of 100 screened patients 90 completed the trial. Baseline mean LC-MS/MS E2 and E1 were 12 pmol/L (range < 5-57) and 66 pmol/L (< 5-226), respectively. E2 levels measured by immunoassay and LC-MS/MS showed no correlation. E2 and E1 were completely suppressed by letrozole except for one occasion (E1 11 pmol/L at 3 months). Pain, side effects of systemic therapy, vasomotor symptoms, joint and muscle aches, and vaginal dryness increased during letrozole treatment. A high baseline E2 was significantly associated with increased aching joints and muscles, but not with the other side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole supresses E2 and E1 completely below the LLOQ of the LC-MS/MS in postmenopausal women. High pre-treatment E2 levels were associated with more joint and muscle pain during letrozole. Automated immunoassays are unsuitable for E2 monitoring during letrozole therapy due to poor sensitivity.

Chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: the choice of treatment modality.

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced oesophageal cancer can be treated with definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) or with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCRT + S), but treatment modality choice is not always clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the choice of treatment modality in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 149 patients treated with dCRT(n = 85) or nCRT + S (n = 64) for oesophageal cancer in Helsinki University Hospital in 2008-2018. Logistic regression was used to analyse factors associated with choice of treatment modality and to compare dosimetric factors with postoperative complications. Multivariate analyses identified factors associated with survival. RESULTS: Surgery was performed after chemoradiation as planned on 64/91 patients (70%). 28/64 had pathological complete response (44%). Probability of nCRT + S was higher in stages I-III versus IV (OR 3.62, 95% CI 1.53-8.53; P = .003), ECOG 0-1 versus 2 (OR 6.99, 95% CI 1.81-26.96; P = .005) or in the middle/lower vs upper oesophageal tumours (OR 5.61, 95% CI 1.83-17.16, P = .003). Probability for surgery was lower, if patient had lost > 10% of body weight (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21-0.98, P = 0.043). Patients in the nCRT + S group had significantly better median overall survival (mOS) and local control than the dCRT group (60 vs. 10 months, P < .001 and 53 vs. 6 months, P < 0.0001, respectively). 10/85 (12%) patients died within three months after dCRT. In multivariate analysis, nCRT + S was associated with improved mOS (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.17-0.44, P < .001). Current smokers had worse mOS (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.04-3.92, P = .037) compared to never-smokers. No significant dosimetric factor associated with postoperative complications was found. CONCLUSION: The overall clinical status of the patients and the stage of the cancer guide the choice of treatment modalities, leading to overtreatment. Patients with better prognoses were more likely operated after chemoradiation, although there is no evidence of OS benefit in previous randomized trials. On the other hand, the prognosis was poor for patients with poor general health and advanced cancers, despite the chemoradiation. Thus, there are signs of overtreatment. MDT practice should be recommended to optimise the choice of treatment modalities. Smoking status is an independent factor associated with survival.

Monitoring serum estradiol levels in breast cancer patients during extended adjuvant letrozole treatment after five years of tamoxifen: a prospective trial.

PURPOSE: To analyze whether monitoring serum estradiol (E2) levels using a highly sensitive and specific liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method may identify patients with AI failure with E2 levels below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) after schwitching from tamoxifen to letrozole. METHODS: In a prospective study of breast cancer patients switching to letrozole treatment after previous tamoxifen, plasma estrogen levels were measured at baseline and after 3- and 12-months using LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were classified postmenopausal and entered into the final analysis. Thirty-nine (85%) patients had three- and 12-month E2 concentrations below the LLOQ (5 pmol/L). In the seven patients classified as AI-failures during letrozole treatment, serum E2-MS level rose above 5 pmol/L at 3 months with a mean E2-MS 77.5 pmol/L or 12 months with a mean E2-MS 21 pmol/L. None of the baseline variables i.e., age at diagnosis, age at study entry, age at menarche, BMI, endometrial thickness, total ovarian volume, baseline FSH, E2-IA, or E2-MS were significantly associated with the risk of AI failure in logistic regression. E2 levels at baseline measured by E2-IA did not significantly correlate to the levels measured by E2-MS. CONCLUSIONS: There is a relatively high risk of inadequate estrogen suppression in patients who switch from tamoxifen treatment to AIs. The use of sensitive and specific assays, such as LC-MS/MS methods, to monitor estrogen levels during AI treatment is essential to minimize the risk of a proceeding inefficient endocrine therapy.

Family history influences the tumor characteristics and prognosis of breast cancers developing during postmenopausal hormone therapy.

Long term use of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) has been reported to increase breast cancer risk. On the other hand, observational studies suggest that breast cancers diagnosed during HT may have a more favorable prognosis. While family history is a risk factor for breast cancer, and genetic factors also influence prognosis, the role of family history in combination with HT use has been little studied. We investigated the relationship between HT, family history, and prognosis in 584 (267 exposed) familial and 952 (460 exposed) non-familial breast cancer cases, using three survival end points: death from breast cancer (BCS), distant disease free survival (DDFS), and local recurrence free survival (LRFS). Among non-familial cases, HT was associated with better BCS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.94; p = 0.025), and DDFS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.85; p = 0.005), with a consistent but not statistically significant effect in LRFS. This effect was not seen in familial cases (HR > 1.0), and family history was found to interact with HT in BCS (p(interaction) = 0.0067) (BC-death) and DDFS (p(interaction) = 0.0070). There was phenotypic heterogeneity between HT-associated tumors in familial and non-familial cases, particularly on estrogen receptor (ER) status, although the interaction between HT and family history appears to be at least partially independent of these markers (p = 0.0370 after adjustment for standard prognostic factors). If confirmed by further studies, our results suggest that family history should be taken into consideration in clinical counseling before beginning a HT regimen.