U.S.-Based Obstetrician/Gynecologists' Experiences with Delivering Care to Women with Female Genital Cutting.

Background: There has been an increase of women living in the United States who have experienced female genital cutting (FGC). However, limited research exists evaluating the experiences of obstetrician/gynecologists delivering care to this patient population. This study aimed to assess the overall experiences, including barriers and facilitators, of U.S.-based obstetrician/gynecologists (OBGYNs) with delivering care to patients with female genital cutting at a single academic health center in the United States. Materials and Methods: This is a qualitative study of OBGYNs at a large, U.S., urban, academic health center. OBGYNs participated in a one-on-one semistructured interview. Thematic analysis using a grounded theory approach was conducted to identify predominating themes regarding the overall experiences, barriers, and facilitators to delivering care to patients with FGC. Results: Analysis of 15 study interviews revealed 4 main themes impacting the ability of OBGYNs to deliver care to patients with FGC: (1) limited educational training on FGC, (2) challenges with identifying that a patient had FGC and with using the World Health Organization classification system, (3) questions regarding "normative" anatomy and reinfibulation after vaginal procedures, and (4) navigating affective responses of patient and self when FGC is encountered. Conclusion: The above findings have practical implications, showing that the limited educational experience and lack of a clear policy on how to manage the care of women with FGC lead to variation and even limitations in how care is delivered to these women. We encourage OBGYN professional societies to consider creating education and policy to aid clinicians in caring for patients with FGC.

Race/Ethnicity and Insurance's Impact on Delays to Kidney Stone Surgery Scheduling.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between ethnicity/insurance status and time to kidney stone surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed all patients with evaluation of nephrolithiasis in the emergency room (ED), followed by definitive stone surgery (ureteroscopy/percutaneous nephrolithotomy/ESWL) at our major academic health system consisting of 3 hospitals in a dense, urban center. RESULTS: A total of 682 patients were included. A total of 2.8% (n = 19) were uninsured, 19.3% (n = 132) were enrolled in Medicaid, 23.3% (n = 159) were enrolled in Medicare and 54.5% (n = 372) had commercial insurance. Uninsured patients had a short median time to surgery of only 21 days (IQR 6-49), while Medicare patients had a longer time at 39 days, (IQR 17-64), although these were not significantly different (P =.12). Black race was associated with a higher percentage of uninsured and Medicaid patients (P ≤.001). There was no difference in clinical or patient reported characteristics between the insurance groups (all P >.05) 6.9%, 17.7%, 26.7%, and 48.6% of patients self-identified as Hispanic, Other, Black, and White, respectively. Hispanic patients had the shortest median time to surgery of 28 days (IQR 10-48), while Black patients the longest with a median of 38.5 days (18-72) (P =.007). Clinical variables at presentation including nausea/vomiting, hydronephrosis and sepsis were not statistically significant between the patient groups (all P >.05). CONCLUSION: Our study illustrates persistent delays in surgery scheduling for Black patients regardless of insurance status. This should inform practice patterns for urology providers, highlighting our need to enact institutional safety nets to promote expedient follow up for a vulnerable population.

Imagining the 'structural' in medical education and practice in the United States: A curricular investigation.

A number of conceptual frameworks have emerged with the goal of helping clinicians understand and navigate the intersections of the health system and broader political, economic, and cultural processes when they care for patients. In this study, we analyze the impact that one emerging framework, "structural competency," had on medical students' and physicians' understanding of societal problems affecting patient health and the practices of health systems. In this sub-analysis of a longitudinal qualitative study conducted between August and December 2020, we analyzed 19 semi-structured interviews with 7 first-year medical students, 7 upper-level medical students, and 5 physician course facilitators who participated in a course called Introduction to Medicine and Society at an medical school in the United States affiliated with a large urban academic medical center. This paper focuses on three main findings: how medical students and faculty describe "structures" and their effects on patients and patient care; how they use or imagine using structural competency to improve patient-physician communication and work interprofessionally to address social needs; and the emotional and personal reactions that confronting societal challenges provokes. We conclude that structural competency enhances existing efforts to improve patient-physician communication and to address patients' social needs. However, we highlight how structural competency efforts might fall short of their goal to shift physicians' perspectives "upstream" to the determinants of health due to both critical ambiguities in the concept and inattention to the emotional and personal impacts of addressing societal problems in the clinic. These findings have practical implications for how clinicians are trained to act on societal issues from within the health system and conceptual implications for refining how existing frameworks and curricula conceive of the intersection between healthcare and broader processes.

Urologic emergencies before and after COVID-19: a retrospective chart review.

INTRODUCTION During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, decreased presentations for various emergent conditions have been observed. Our objective was to compare the volume of patients with urologic emergencies presenting to emergency departments (EDs) within a single health system before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for 3 EDs within a single health system in the United States to identify all ED consults to urology from January 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020. For emergent consults, covariates were extracted, including demographic information, insurance status, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, travel distance from home to the ED, and whether the patient had seen a provider in the hospital system before. Data were compared between COVID-19 months (March-May 2020) and corresponding months in 2019. RESULTS: The study period encompassed 1,179 consults and 373 urologic emergencies. We observed not only a 22% decrease in urologic presentations to the ED compared to corresponding months in 2019, but also a 54% decrease in the proportion of urologic presentations that were truly emergent. For patients with emergent diagnoses, April 2020 saw an increase in Medicare/Medicaid coverage and a decrease in private insurance, May 2020 saw a decreased travel distance from home to the ED, and March and May 2020 saw an increase in patients who had previously seen a health system provider outside of the ED. No changes were seen in demographic characteristics or CCI. CONCLUSIONS: During the early COVID-19 pandemic, urologic emergencies within a single health system decreased by 54% compared to the corresponding months pre-pandemic. Those who do present for care may be influenced by both locality and provider familiarity.

Adapting to the Educational Challenges of a Pandemic: Development of a Novel Virtual Urology Subinternship During the Time of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To design, implement, and evaluate learner attitudes of a virtual urologic surgery clinical rotation for medical students. METHODS: Ten senior medical students at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania were enrolled. Students were administered a precourse test on their perceived confidence of their urologic knowledge, confidence in identifying urologic conditions, comfort with performing urologic evaluations, and confidence placing consults for urologic issues. Students participated in a 2-week curriculum that included both asynchronous and synchronous content. Asynchronous content included prerecorded lectures, self-paced problem-based learning modules, directed reading and video content, and an online discussion board. Synchronous content included real-time videoconferences covering case discussions, simulated patient presentations, and critical literature reviews. At the conclusion of the course, students were administered the postcourse survey evaluating changes in their ability to identify and understand urologic conditions. RESULTS: The postcourse survey demonstrated this course significantly increases students' scores in: self-perceived urologic knowledge, confidence in naming urologic conditions, comfort with performing urologic evaluations, and confidence placing consults for urologic conditions (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Virtual medical student rotations are scalable and effective at delivering surgical material and can approximate the interpersonal teaching found in clinical learning environments. They may be a useful tool to supplement or augment clinical learning in select situations.