Exposed Intramedullary Fixation Produces Similar Outcomes to Buried Fixation for Acute Pediatric Monteggia Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures requires ulnar length stability to maintain reduction of the radiocapitellar joint. When operative care is indicated, intramedullary ulna fixation can be buried or left temporarily exposed through the skin while under a cast. The authors hypothesized that treatment with exposed fixation yields equivalent results to buried fixation for Monteggia fractures while avoiding secondary surgery for hardware removal. METHODS: A retrospective review of children with acute Monteggia fractures at our Level 1 pediatric trauma center was performed. Patient charts and radiographs were evaluated for age, fracture type, fracture location, Bado classification, type of treatment, complications, cast duration, time to fracture union, time to hardware removal, and range of motion. RESULTS: Out of 59 acute Monteggia fractures surgically treated (average age 6 y, range 2 to 14), 15 (25%) patients were fixed with buried intramedullary fixation and 44 (75%) with exposed intramedullary fixation under a cast. There were no significant differences between buried and exposed intramedullary fixation in cast time after surgery (39 vs. 37 d; P =0.55), time to fracture union (37 vs. 35 d; P =0.67), pronation/supination (137 vs. 134 degrees; P =0.68) or flexion/extension (115 vs. 114 degrees; P =0.81) range of motion. The exposed fixation had a return to OR of 4.5% (2 out of 44), and the buried fixation returned to the OR for removal on all patients. CONCLUSION: Exposed intramedullary fixation yielded equivalent clinical outcomes to buried devices in the treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures while eliminating the need for a second surgery to remove hardware, reducing the associated risks and costs of surgery and anesthesia, but had a higher complication rate. Open Monteggia fractures or patterns with a known risk of delayed union may benefit from buried instead of exposed intramedullary fixation for earlier mobilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Pre-operative nutrition assessments do not improve outcomes in cerebral palsy patients undergoing varus derotational osteotomy.

ABSTRACT: Pre-operative nutritional assessments have been used as a "cornerstone" to help optimize nutritional status and weight in children with cerebral palsy (CP) to lower the risk of postoperative complications. However, the potential value of nutritional assessments on surgical outcomes in patients with CP undergoing major orthopedic surgery remains unproven.Do pre-operative nutritional assessments reduce complication rates of varus derotational osteotomy surgery in children with CP? Are complication rates higher in patients with a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) and can they be decreased by pre-operative nutritional assessment?One-hundred fifty-five patients with CP who underwent varus derotational osteotomy from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2017 at a tertiary pediatric hospital with minimum 6 months follow-up were retrospectively identified. One-hundred-ten (71%) were categorized as "non-ambulatory" (Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] IV-V), and 45 (29%) as "ambulatory" (GMFCS I-III). Variables assessed included age, GMFCS level, G-tube, body mass index (BMI) percentile, complications, and if patients underwent pre-operative nutritional assessment.One-hundred-eleven patients (71.6%) underwent pre-operative nutritional assessment. Sixty-two of 155 patients (40.0%) had G-tubes. In non-ambulatory patients with G-tubes, BMI percentile changes were not significantly different between patients with a pre-operative nutritional assessment compared to those without at 1 (P = .58), 3 (P = .61), 6 (P = .28), and 12 months (P = .21) postoperatively. In non-ambulatory patients who underwent pre-operative nutritional assessment, BMI percentile changes were not significantly different between those with and without G-tubes at 1 (P = .61), 3 (P = .71), 6 (P = .19), and 12 months (P = .10). Pulmonary complication rates were significantly higher in non-ambulatory patients with G-tubes than in non-ambulatory patients without G-tubes (20% vs 4%, P = .03). Pre-operative nutritional assessments did not influence postoperative complication rates for non-ambulatory patients with or without a G-tube (P = .12 and P = .16, respectively). No differences were found in postoperative complications between ambulatory patients with and without G-tubes (P = .45) or between ambulatory patients with or without nutritional assessments (P = .99).Nutritional assessments, which may improve long term patient nutrition, should not delay hip surgery in patients with CP and progressive lower extremity deformity. Patients and their families are unlikely to derive any short-term nutritional improvement using routine pre-operative evaluation and surgical outcomes are unlikely to be improved.Level of Evidence: III, retrospective comparative.