Pan-Canadian Analysis of Practice Patterns in Small Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: Insights from a Multidisciplinary Survey.

Small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNECC) is a rare cancer with poor prognosis, with limited data to guide its treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate practice patterns in the management of SCNECC. A 23-question online survey on management of SCNECC was disseminated to Canadian gynecologic oncologists (GO), radiation oncologists (RO) and medical oncologists (MO). In total, 34 practitioners from eight provinces responded, including 17 GO, 13 RO and four MO. During staging and diagnosis, 74% of respondents used a trimodality imaging approach, and 85% tested for neuroendocrine markers. In early-stage (1A1-1B2) SCNECC, 87% of practitioners used a surgical-based approach with various adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments. In locally advanced (1B3-IVA) SCNECC, 53% favored primary chemoradiation, with cisplatin and etoposide, with the remainder using surgical or radiation-based approaches. In metastatic and recurrent SCNECC, the most common first-line regimen was etoposide and platinum, and 63% of practitioners considered clinical trials in the first line setting or beyond. This survey highlights diverse practice patterns in the treatment of SCNECC. Interdisciplinary input is crucial to individualizing multimodality treatment, and there is a need for prospective trials and intergroup collaboration to define the optimal approach towards managing this rare cancer type.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: An Opportunity for Targeted Systemic Therapies in a High-Need Patient Population.

PURPOSE: Trastuzumab deruxtecan is a new treatment option for patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer (BC). Although HER2-low status has been characterized in early and advanced BC, it has yet to be fully characterized in brain metastases (BrM). METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for BC BrM at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and for whom HER2 status was available on resected BrM were studied. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status were assessed on the basis of ASCO/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines. HER2-zero was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0; HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+ with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-negative status. HER2-positive (HER2+) was defined as IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ with positive FISH. Clinicopathologic features were recorded. We also assessed the prognostic association between extent of HER2 expression and (1) brain-specific progression-free survival (bsPFS), as well as (2) overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In this retrospective cohort of 102 patients with resected BC BrM, 53% (n = 54) were HER2+, 29.4% (n = 30) were HER2-low, and 17.6% (n = 18) had HER2-zero status. Among BrM that were triple-negative on the basis of ASCO/CAP guidelines, 63.6% (n = 14/22) were reclassified as being HER2-low. Sixty percent (n = 15/25) of BrM that were hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) were reclassified as being HER2-low. In total, 51 patients had matched primary breast and BrM tissue available; results of HER2 status when categorized as HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2+ were concordant in 82.3% (n = 42/51) of cases (Cohen's kappa, 0.58; P = .07). There was no significant association between HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2+ status in BrM and either bsPFS or OS. CONCLUSION: Among patients with surgically resected BrM, a high proportion of those with metastatic triple-negative BC and HR+/HER2- disease have HER2-low BrM with potential to benefit from HER2-targeted therapy.

Androgen Receptor Is Expressed in the Majority of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases and Is Subtype-Dependent.

We aimed to evaluate the expression of the "targetable" androgen receptor (AR) in breast cancer brain metastases (BrM). An established, retrospective 57-patient cohort with metastatic breast cancer who underwent surgery for BrM at the Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre between 1999-2013 was studied. AR expression in BrM samples was assessed in triplicate using immunohistochemistry (IHC). AR positive status was defined as nuclear AR expression ≥ 10% by IHC using the SP107 antibody. The median age of patients was 52 years (range 32-85 years). 28 (49%) of BrM were HER2+, 17 (30%) were hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-, and 12 (21%) were triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs). 56% (n = 32/57) of BrM were AR positive, and median AR expression was 20% (CI 1.6-38.3%). AR expression was different across breast cancer subtypes; AR was most frequently expressed in HER2+ (n = 21/28), followed by HR+/HER2- (n = 9/17), and lowest in TNBC (n = 2/12) BrM (p = 0.003). Patients with AR positive versus AR negative BrM had similar overall survival (12.5 vs. 7.9 months, p = 0.6), brain-specific progression-free survival (8.0 vs. 5.1 months, p = 0.95), and time from breast cancer diagnosis to BrM diagnosis (51 vs. 29 months, p = 0.16). AR is expressed in the majority of breast cancer BrM and represents a potential therapeutic target.

Type and timing of systemic therapy use predict overall survival for patients with brain metastases treated with radiation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate whether systemic therapy (ST) use surrounding radiation therapy (RT) predicts overall survival (OS) after RT for patients with brain metastases (BMs). METHODS: Provincial RT and pharmacy databases were used to review all adult patients in British Columbia, Canada, who received a first course of RT for BMs between 2012 and 2016 (n = 3095). Multivariate analysis on a randomly selected subset was used to develop an OS nomogram. RESULTS: In comparison to the 2096 non-recipients of ST after RT, the median OS of the 999 recipients of ST after RT was 5.0 (95% Confidence interval (CI) 4.1-6.0) months longer (p < 0.0001). Some types of ST after RT were independently predictive of OS: targeted therapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, CI 0.37-0.48), hormone therapy (HR 0.45, CI 0.36-0.55), cytotoxic chemotherapy (HR 0.71, CI 0.64-0.79), and immunotherapy (HR 0.64, CI 0.37-1.06). Patients who discontinued ST after RT had 0.9 (CI 0.3-1.4) months shorter median OS than patients who received no ST before or after RT (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis of the 220-patient subset, established prognostic variables (extracranial disease, performance status, age, cancer diagnosis, and number of BMs), and the novel variables "ST before RT" and "Type of ST after RT" independently predicted OS. The nomogram predicted 6- and 12-month OS probability and median OS (bootstrap-corrected Harrell's Concordance Index = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: The type and timing of ST use surrounding RT predict OS for patients with BMs.