Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 59: 121-128, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35841845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the emergency department, delirium associated with serious adverse outcomes is common in geriatric patients. We performed a meta-analysis and estimated the prevalence of delirium and its related factors among geriatric emergency department patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and CBM databases were searched before November 7, 2021. The random-effects model was used to estimate the prevalence of delirium. In addition, subgroup analyses were performed based on continent or region, publication year, age, sample size, and diagnostic criteria or assessment methods. RESULTS: 30 studies involving 19,534 geriatric patients in the emergency department were included. The overall pooled crude prevalence estimate of delirium was 15.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.5-18.0%]. Subgroup analyses revealed that the region, publication year, age, sample size, and delirium assessment methods were significantly correlated with the prevalence of delirium. Meta-regression analysis showed that the publication year was positively, while the sample size was negatively associated with the pooled prevalence of delirium. CONCLUSION: In the emergency department, delirium is common in geriatric patients. We should pay specific attention to delirium screening, prevention, and treatment in geriatric patients. Overall appropriate interventions should be utilized to reduce the occurrence of delirium and the adverse outcomes.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Aged , Delirium/diagnosis , Delirium/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Mass Screening , Prevalence
2.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr ; 98: 104534, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34601314

ABSTRACT

Background The effect of preoperative sarcopenia on postoperative complications and prognosis in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer has been controversial. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of preoperative sarcopenia on postoperative complications and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer through meta-analysis method, providing new ideas for the prognosis study of patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods From databases establishment to April 2021, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, WanFang Data, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) to collect cohort studies on the effect of sarcopenia on postoperative complications or prognosis of gastric cancer. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted the data. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies and Revman 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. Result A total of 20 studies (11 prospective cohort studies and 9 retrospective cohort studies) involving 7615 patients were finally included. Meta-analysis showed that: 1) preoperative sarcopenia significantly increased the risk of overall complications (risk ratio[RR] =2.89, 95% confidence interval[CI]: 1.86, 4.49; P < 0.000 01), serious complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III, RR = 3.01, 95% CI: 1.73, 5.23; P < 0.000 01), pneumonia (RR =2.64, 95% CI: 1.71, 4.09; P < 0.0001), and obstruction (RR = 3.96, 95% CI: 2.27, 6.90; P < 0.000 01), but did not increase the risk of postoperative delayed gastric emptying (RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.63, 3.25; P = 0.38), intra-abdominal infection (RR =2.09, 95% CI: 0.88, 5.00; P = 0.10), and anastomotic leakage (RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.69, 2.32; P = 0.45); 2) preoperative sarcopenia reduced the overall survival rate (HR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.53, 1.91; P < 0.00001). Conclusion Preoperative sarcopenia increased the risk of postoperative complications and reduced the overall survival rate of patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Therefore, for patients with gastric cancer, preoperative risk assessment and active intervention for sarcopenia are necessary to reduce the risk of postoperative complications and improve poor prognosis. Future studies should focus on the effect of preoperative sarcopenia on the quality of life after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.


Subject(s)
Sarcopenia , Stomach Neoplasms , Cohort Studies , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Humans , Postoperative Complications , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Sarcopenia/complications , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...