Partial resection of lateral discoid meniscus changes lower limb axial alignment - A retrospective cohort study.

AIM: This study aimed to explore the changes in lower limb axial alignment and knee joint function after arthroscopic partial resection of the discoid lateral meniscus. METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative full-length weight-bearing radiographs of the lower limb were obtained from a total of 161 patients with lateral menisci tears from September 2018 to September 2020 who underwent partial meniscal resection. The patients were divided into discoid meniscus group (DMG) and ordinary meniscus group (OMG). The measured mechanical axis deviation (MAD), proximal tibia angle (PTA), and distal femoral angle (DFA) in the axial alignment of the lower limb were determined before and after surgery. Knee joint function on the affected side was determined using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scale and the Lysholm knee scoring scale before surgery and at one, six, 12, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: For MAD and DFA, there were statistically significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative findings within each group (P < 0.01); the MAD and DFA were smaller after surgery. The difference in preoperative and postoperative PTA of the DMG was statistically significant (P < 0.01), meaning that the PTA becomes larger after surgery. The differences in preoperative and postoperative PTA of the OMG, preoperative PTA between the two groups, and postoperative PTA between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Intragroup comparisons of the IKDC subjective scale and the Lysholm knee scoring scale before and after surgery revealed significant differences (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic partial resection of the discoid lateral meniscus is a safe and effective surgical method that can significantly improve knee joint function. Although the axial arrangement of the lower limbs will be slightly changed in the early stage, it will still be within the normal range after surgery in patients with normal lower limb axial alignment. For patients with varus or valgus before surgery, this procedure should be applied with caution.

Metal allergy in total-joint arthroplasty: Case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Due to the low incidence and lack of effective diagnostic measures for the diagnosis of metal allergy in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA), diagnosis relies mainly on the exclusion of other causes, in particular infection. It remains a relatively unpredictable and poorly understood cause of implant failure. At present, skin patch testing, leukocyte migration inhibition test (LMIT) and lymphocyte transformation tests (LTT) are being commonly used to assess metal hypersensitivity.This report presents both a case and literature review. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 61-year-old female patient experienced continuous swelling and pain in the right knee joint for 9 months after a right-side total knee arthroplasty (TKA). DIAGNOSES: We believe this is the case report of metal allergy in TKA. The following were the reasons for this. First, no definite symptoms of infection during revision arthroplasty were observed, but with obvious hyperplasia of synovium. Furthermore, a frozen biopsy revealed an extremely low neutrophil count, which was considered to be caused by chronic inflammation. Second, the results of repeated post-operation reexaminations indicate a clear increase in the number of eosinophils, while no bacteria were found in the tissue bacterial smear performed during the operation. Third, improvements were clearly observed in the patient following synovectomy, revision of the polyethylene insert and anti-anaphylactic treatment. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent synovectomy, revision of the polyethylene insert and anti-anaphylactic treatment. OUTCOMES: The patient's right knee remained mildly swollen; however, the pain has been relieved significantly. The range of motion could achieve 0 degrees of extension and 90 degrees of flexion. LESSONS: No consensus has been reached about the best diagnostic criteria for this disease, and most physicians would consider it to be a possibility when other diseases including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have been excluded. Although this case followed the same course, the outcome following synovectomy and anti-anaphylactic treatment further confirmed our hypothesis.