Poor pre-dialysis glycaemic control is a predictor of mortality in type II diabetic patients on maintenance haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: In type II diabetic patients, a better glycaemic control has been reported to slow down the progression of nephropathy. The effect of pre-dialysis glycaemic control on the long term prognosis in type II diabetics on haemodialysis is still uncertain. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of glycaemic control before starting maintenance haemodialysis on the clinical outcome in type II diabetic haemodialysis patients. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-seven type II diabetics receiving regular haemodialysis in a single university hospital were enrolled. The patients were classified as either good or poor glycaemic control group according to their glycaemic control within 6 months before starting haemodialysis. Serum albumin, haematocrit, cholesterol, triglyceride, residual renal function, diabetic complications, and patient survival were analysed in both groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in age, gender, predialysis albumin level, cholesterol level, triglyceride level, and residual renal function between the two groups. The 1-year (94.5% vs 80.0%), 3-year (82.9% vs 58.1%), and 5-year (75.8% vs 21.8%) cumulative survival rates were lower in the poor glycaemic control group than in the good glycaemic control group (P < 0.001). The poor glycaemic control group also had more cardiovascular morbidity during the period of dialysis (P < 0.001). The increase in cardiovascular complications also accounted for the increased mortality during the course of haemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that poor glycaemic control before starting dialysis is a strong predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and survival for type II diabetics on haemodialysis. These results imply that better glycaemic control before dialysis might be important in improving the long-term prognosis in type II diabetics on haemodialysis.

Predialysis glycemic control is an independent predictor of clinical outcome in type II diabetics on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation between predialysis glycemic control and clinical outcomes for type II diabetic patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). DESIGN: Sixty type II diabetic patients on CAPD were classified into 2 groups according to the status of glycemic control. In group G (good glycemic control), more than 50% of blood glucose determinations were within 3.3-11 mmol/L and the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level was within 5-10% at all times. In group P (poor glycemic control), fewer than 50% of blood glucose determinations were within 3.3-11 mmol/L or HbA1C level was above 10% at least once during the follow-up duration. In addition to glycemic control status, predialysis serum albumin, cholesterol levels, residual renal function, peritoneal membrane function, and the modes of glycemic control were also recorded. SETTING: Dialysis Unit, Department of Nephrology of a single university hospital. PATIENTS: From February 1988 to October 1995, 60 type II diabetic patients receiving CAPD for at least 3 months were enrolled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidities before and during the dialysis period, patient survival, and causes of mortality. RESULTS: The patients with good glycemic control had significantly better survival than patients with poor glycemic control (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in predialysis morbidity between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in patient survival between the patients with serum albumin greater than 30 g/L and those with less than 30 g/L (p = 0.77), with cholesterol levels greater or less than 5.18 mmol/L (p = 0.73), and with different peritoneal membrane solute transport characteristics evaluated by peritoneal equilibration test (p = 0.12). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in survival whether the patients controlled blood sugar by diet or with insulin (p = 0.33). Cardiovascular disease and infection were the major causes of death in both groups. Although good glycemic control predicts better survival, it does not change the pattern of mortality in diabetics maintained on CAPD. CONCLUSIONS: Glycemic control before starting dialysis is a predictor of survival for type II diabetics on CAPD. Patients with poor glycemic control predialysis are associated with increased morbidity and shortened survival.