The role of diagnostic laparoscopy for chronic abdominal conditions: an evidence-based review.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic laparoscopy is minimally invasive surgery for the diagnosis of intraabdominal diseases. The aim of this review is a critical examination of the available literature on the role of laparoscopy for chronic intraabdominal conditions. METHODS: A systematic literature search of English-language articles on MEDLINE, the Cochrane database of evidence-based reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects was performed for the period 1995-2006. The level of evidence in the identified articles was graded. The search identified and reviewed six main categories that have received attention in the literature: pelvic pain and endometriosis, primary and secondary infertility, nonpalpable testis, and liver disease. RESULTS: The indications, contraindications, risks, benefits, diagnostic accuracy of the procedure, and its associated morbidity are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The limitations of the available literature are highlighted, and evidence-based recommendations for the use of laparoscopy to stage intraabdominal cancers are provided.

The role of staging laparoscopy for intraabdominal cancers: an evidence-based review.

Diagnostic laparoscopy is minimally invasive surgery for the diagnosis of intraabdominal diseases. The aim of this review is a critical examination of the available literature on the role of laparoscopy for the staging of intraabdominal cancers. A systematic literature search of English-language articles on MEDLINE, the Cochrane database of evidence-based reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects was performed for the period 1995-2006. The level of evidence in the identified articles was graded. The search identified and reviewed seven main categories that have received attention in the literature: esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, biliary tract cancer, colorectal cancer, and lymphoma. The indications, contraindications, risks, benefits, diagnostic accuracy of the procedure, and its associated morbidity are discussed. The limitations of the available literature are highlighted, and evidence-based recommendations for the use of laparoscopy to stage intraabdominal cancers are provided.

Laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer: an evidence-based review.

The initial enthusiastic application of laparoscopic techniques to colorectal surgical procedures was tempered in the early 1990s by reports of tumor implants in the laparoscopic incisions. Substantial evidence has accumulated, including evidence from randomized controlled trials, to support that laparoscopic resection results in oncologic outcomes similar to open resection, when performed by well-trained, experienced surgeons. This review was developed in conjunction with guidelines published by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Data from the surgical literature concerning laparoscopic resection of curable colorectal cancer was evaluated regarding diagnostic evaluation, preoperative preparation, operative techniques, prevention of tumor implants, and training and experience. Recommendations are accompanied by an assessment of the level of supporting evidence available at the time of the development of the guidelines.

Circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy is a safe, effective outpatient alternative for the treatment of symptomatic prolapsing hemorrhoids in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy (CMSP) was first introduced in 1993 as a less painful and highly effective alternative to traditional operative hemorrhoidectomy. Although CMSP has many advantages over traditional hemorrhoidectomy, some authorities and insurers continue to regard it as an inpatient procedure and others have been slow to adopt this progressive technique. This study documents the safe and effective outpatient nature of this procedure. METHODS: From December 2001 through August 2002, 33 patients with mucosal prolapse and prolapsing internal hemorrhoids were treated using circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy as outpatients at an ambulatory surgery center. Fourteen (42%) patients were treated using local anesthesia with intravenous sedation, 18 (55%) chose spinal anesthesia, and general anesthesia was used in one patient. Patients were evaluated postoperatively by telephone at 1 and 2 weeks, and seen in clinic at 4 weeks. RESULTS: One patient (3%) required an emergency department visit for minor postoperative bleeding. None of our elderly patients required emergency department evaluation and none reported significant complications. Four patients (13%) required urinary catheter placement prior to discharge from the surgery center due to urinary retention. One patient (3%) developed an uncomplicated urinary tract infection, which resolved with antibiotic treatment. Two patients were seen earlier than 4 weeks at the surgeon's request; one was immunocompromised from chemotherapy for metastatic carcinoid, and one reported persistent pain during initial telephone follow-up. No complications were identified in either patient, and no additional complications have been noted to date. CONCLUSIONS: CMSP is a safe, effective, time-efficient procedure for patients with mucosal prolapse and prolapsing hemorrhoids that can be performed safely in the ambulatory surgery center setting. Age is not a limiting factor in selecting patients for this safe outpatient procedure.

Colonoscopic retrieval of an appendiceal foreign body: prophylaxis for appendicitis?

Management of orally ingested foreign bodies usually consists of endoscopic retrieval while the objects reside within the esophagus or stomach. Although most foreign bodies that pass through the pylorus will be excreted without incident, some may become impacted distally, resulting in obstruction or perforation. Appendiceal foreign bodies have been reported rarely, yet have resulted in the development of acute appendicitis. We report the case of a young male who swallowed a nail that became impacted in the appendiceal lumen and was retrieved colonoscopically before the development of acute appendicitis.

Cryoanalgesic ablation for the treatment of chronic postherniorrhaphy neuropathic pain.

BACKGROUND: Chronic postoperative pain has been reported in as many as 62.9% of patients after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Moderate to severe neuropathic pain requiring intervention develops in 2.2% to 11.9% of patients as a result of ileoinguinal and genitofemoral nerve entrapment. Cryoanalgesic ablation has been successful in treating chronic pain from craniofacial neuralgia, facet joint syndrome, and malignant pain syndromes. We report our experience using cryoanalgesic ablation for chronic ileoinguinal and genitofemoral neuralgia after inguinal herniorrhaphy. METHODS: Ten patients with ileoinguinal, genitofemoral, or combined neuralgia underwent 12 cryoanalgesic ablations between April 1996 and June 2001. These patients were referred from a multidisciplinary pain clinic, and focused low-volume nerve blocks were used to map nerve involvement preoperatively. After surgical exposure, nerves and surrounding tissues were cooled to ?70 degrees C for 3 min using the Lloyd Neurostat. Patients were seen 2 weeks postoperatively and offered monthly follow-up assessments. RESULTS: Nine men and one woman, ages 20 to 54 (mean, 42.6 years) were treated during 58 months, with a mean follow-up period of 8.2 months, for ileoinguinal (n = 4), genitofemoral (n = 1), and combined (n = 5) neuralgia. Patients reported one to five prior herniorrhaphies (mean, 1.8), experienced neuropathic pain 0 to 14 years (mean, 6.3 years), and underwent up to 3 (mean, 1.3) ablative pain procedures before referral. After cryotherapy, patients reported overall pain reduction of 0% to 100% (mean, 77.5%; median, 100%); 80% reported decreased analgesic use, and 90% reported increased physical capacity. Two patients underwent additional cryotherapy, one for incomplete relief and one for recurrent pain, both with 100% efficacy. Wound infection (n = 1) was the only complication. CONCLUSIONS: Cryoanalgesic ablation successfully eliminates ileoinguinal and genitofemoral neuralgia in most patients, and should be considered early in the treatment of patients with postherniorrhaphy neuropathic pain.

Enteroscopic treatment of early postoperative small bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Early postoperative small bowel obstruction (EPSBO) occurs in 1% of patients undergoing laparotomy and has a mortality rate exceeding 17%. Nasogastric (NG) decompression is successful in avoiding reoperation in 73% of patients. Repeat laparotomy has been recommended when obstruction does not resolve after 14 days of NG decompression. We report four patients with EPSBO treated successfully with push enteroscopy after failed NG decompression. METHODS: Four patients who failed NG decompression underwent push enteroscopy instead of repeat laparotomy. EPSBO was diagnosed if obstruction lasting more than 14 days developed after initial resolution of postoperative ileus, high NG output persisted postoperatively for 21 days in the absence of sepsis, or radiographic signs of obstruction persisted. Small bowel series or computed tomography were utilized when radiographic assessment was necessary. The Olympus SIF 100 push enteroscope was introduced with an overtube using topical anesthesia and intravenous sedation. After maximal insertion, the enteroscope was withdrawn without evacuation of insufflated air. NG tubes were placed after enteroscopy and patients were followed clinically. Flatus, defecation, and tolerance of a general diet defined resolution of EPSBO. RESULTS: EPSBO resolved 24 to 36 h following enteroscopy, and all patients were discharged on general diets 48 h after return of bowel function. Readmission has not been necessary during 18- to 30-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that push enteroscopy is successful in treating EPSBO and should be considered prior to reoperation. Push enteroscopy may eliminate the hazards of repeat laparotomy and reduce the morbidity, treatment cost, and lengthy hospital stays associated with this uncommon surgical complication.

Laparoscopic endobiliary stenting significantly improves success of postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in low-volume centers.

BACKGROUND: Occult common bile duct stones (CBDS) discovered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography are most often managed by postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Expert endoscopists at high-volume centers achieve common bile duct cannulation in nearly all patients undergoing ERCP, but cannulation rates of less than 80% have been observed in low-volume centers. As many as 20% of patients with CBDS referred for postoperative ERCP in low-volume centers may require repeated attempts at ERCP, referral to a high-volume center, percutaneous transhepatic techniques, or reoperation for clearance of CBDS when postoperative ERCP fails. METHODS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography performed in 511 consecutive patients over 80 months at a community hospital showed occult CBDS in 66 patients (12.9%). Laparoscopic endobiliary stent placement was successful in 65 patients (98.5%). As part of an earlier study, 16 patients underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with clearance of CBDS before stent placement. Laparoscopic endobiliary stent placement failed in one patient for whom CBDS were cleared with intraoperative ERCP. RESULTS: Initial postoperative ERCP was successful in clearing CBDS in all 65 patients (100%) with laparoscopically placed stents. During the same period, 611 patients underwent ERCP for various indications including CBDS (43%). Selective cannulation was achieved in 78% of all patients during initial ERCP. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic endobiliary stent placement is an effective adjunct to the management of occult CBDS. Laparoscopic endobiliary stenting ensures selective cannulation during postoperative ERCP and eliminates the need for repeated attempts at ERCP, referral to specialty centers, use of transhepatic techniques, or reoperation for retained CBDS. Laparoscopic endobiliary stent placement for treatment of occult CBDS significantly improves the success of postoperative ERCP in low-volume centers and eliminates the morbidity and expense of repeated procedures.

Laparoscopic endobiliary stenting: a simplified approach to the management of occult common bile duct stones.

Three years ago we described laparoscopic placement of biliary stents as an adjunct to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in 16 patients. We now present a modification of our technique and experience with 48 additional patients. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative fluorocholangiography (LC/IOC) performed in 372 consecutive patients during a 36-month period revealed common bile duct stones (CBDS) in 48 patients (12.9%). In this series, LCBDE was not performed and no attempt was made to clear CBDS prior to transcystic stent placement. Stent placement added 9 to 26 minutes of operative time to LC/IOC alone. Forty-four patients (92%) were discharged after surgery and four (8%) were observed overnight. Outpatient endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 1 to 4 weeks later succeeded in clearing CBDS in all patients. All stents were retrieved without difficulty and 3- to 36-month follow-up demonstrates no surgical, endoscopic, or stent-related complications to date. Laparoscopic biliary stent placement for the treatment of CBDS is a safe, rapid, technically less challenging alternative to existing methods of LCBDE. It preserves the benefits of minimally invasive surgery for patients, and virtually assures success of postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with complete stone clearance.