A randomized, cross-over trial of metoprolol succinate formulations to evaluate PK and PD end points for therapeutic equivalence.

There are limited comparison data throughout the dosing interval for generic versus brand metoprolol extended-release (ER) tablets. We compared the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics of brand name versus two generic formulations (drugs 1 and 2) of metoprolol ER tablets with different time to maximum concentration (Tmax ) in adults with hypertension. Participants were randomized to equal drug doses (50-150 mg/day) administered in one of two sequences (brand-drug1-brand-drug2 or brand-drug2-brand-drug1) and completed 24-h PK, digital heart rate (HR), ambulatory blood pressure (BP), and HR studies after taking each formulation for greater than or equal to 7 days. Metoprolol concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, with noncompartmental analysis performed to obtain PK parameters in Phoenix WinNonlin. Heart rate variability (HRV) low-to-high frequency ratio was determined per quartile over the 24-h period. Thirty-six participants completed studies with the brand name and at least one generic product. Among 30 participants on the 50 mg dose, the primary PK end points of area under the concentration-time curve and Cmax were similar between products; Tmax was 6.1 ± 3.6 for the brand versus 3.5 ± 4.9 for drug 1 (p = 0.019) and 9.6 ± 3.2 for drug 2 (p < 0.001). Among all 36 participants, 24-h BPs and HRs were similar between products. Mean 24-h HRV low-to-high ratio was also similar for drug 1 (2.04 ± 1.35), drug 2 (1.86 ± 1.35), and brand (2.04 ± 1.77), but was more sustained over time for the brand versus drug 1 (drug × quartile interaction p = 0.017). Differences in Tmax between metoprolol ER products following repeated doses may have implications for drug effects on autonomic balance over the dosing interval.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetics modeling to investigate formulation factors influencing the generic substitution of dabigatran etexilate.

The exposure-response relationship of direct acting oral anti-coagulants (DOACs) for bleeding risk is steep relative to ischemic stroke reduction. As a result, small changes in exposure may lead to bleeding events. The overall goal of this project was to determine the effect of critical formulation parameters on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and thus safety and efficacy of generic DOACs. In this first installment of our overall finding, we developed and verified a physiologically-based PK (PBPK) model for dabigatran etexilate (DABE) and its metabolites. The model was developed following a middle out approach leveraging available in vitro and in vivo data. External validity of the model was confirmed by overlapping predicted and observed PK profiles for DABE as well as free and total dabigatran for a dataset not used during model development. The verified model was applied to interrogate the impact of modulating the microenvironment pH on DABE systemic exposure. The PBPK exploratory analyses highlighted the high sensitivity of DABE exposure to supersaturation ratio and precipitation kinetics.

A General Framework for Assessing In vitro/In vivo Correlation as a Tool for Maximizing the Benefit-Risk Ratio of a Treatment Using a Convolution-Based Modeling Approach.

The net benefit of a treatment can be defined by the relationship between clinical improvement and risk of adverse events: the benefit-risk ratio. The optimization of the benefit-risk ratio can be achieved by identifying the most adequate dose (and/or dosage regimen) jointly with the best-performing in vivo release properties of a drug. A general in silico tool is presented for identifying the dose, the in vitro and the in vivo release properties that maximize the benefit-risk ratio using convolution-based modeling, an exposure-response model, and a surface response analysis. A case study is presented to illustrate how the benefit-risk ratio of methylphenidate for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder can be maximized using the proposed strategy. The results of the analysis identified the characteristics of an optimized dose and in vitro/in vivo release suitable to provide a sustained clinical response with respect to the conventional dosage regimen and formulations.