Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 269, 2024 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38685055

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of Percutaneous Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE-PLIF) combined with a novel Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) approach using a large-channel endoscope in treating Lumbar Degenerative Diseases (LDD). METHODS: This retrospective analysis evaluates 41 LDD patients treated with PE-PLIF and ULBD from January 2021 to June 2023. A novel ULBD approach, called 'Non-touch Over-Top' technique, was utilized in this study. We compared preoperative and postoperative metrics such as demographic data, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, surgical details, and radiographic changes. RESULTS: The average follow-up duration was 14.41 ± 2.86 months. Notable improvements were observed postoperatively in VAS scores for back and leg pain (from 5.56 ± 0.20 and 6.95 ± 0.24 to 0.20 ± 0.06 and 0.12 ± 0.05), ODI (from 58.68 ± 0.80% to 8.10 ± 0.49%), and JOA scores (from 9.37 ± 0.37 to 25.07 ± 0.38). Radiographic measurements showed significant improvements in lumbar and segmental lordosis angles, disc height, and spinal canal area. A high fusion rate (97.56% at 6 months, 100% at 12 months) and a low cage subsidence rate (2.44%) were noted. CONCLUSIONS: PE-PLIF combined with the novel ULBD technique via a large-channel endoscope offers significant short-term benefits for LDD management. The procedure effectively expands spinal canal volume, decompresses nerve structures, improves lumbar alignment, and stabilizes the spine. Notably, it improves patients' quality of life and minimizes complications, highlighting its potential as a promising LDD treatment option.


Subject(s)
Decompression, Surgical , Endoscopy , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , Lumbar Vertebrae , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fusion/methods , Endoscopy/methods , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/diagnostic imaging , Follow-Up Studies , Adult , Laminectomy/methods
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 80, 2024 01 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38168463

ABSTRACT

In this study, we present a novel surgical method that utilizes the ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS) for the removal of large retrovertebral osteophytes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and evaluate its safety and efficacy in comparison to the traditional approach of using high-speed drill (HSD). A total of 56 patients who underwent ACDF for retrovertebral osteophytes were selected. We recorded patients' baseline information, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, JOA and VAS scores, and other relevant data. The mean operation time and the mean intraoperative blood loss in the UBS group were less than those in the HSD group (P < 0.05). Although both groups exhibited considerable improvements in JOA and VAS scores following surgery, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Additionally, no significant disparities were found in bone graft fusion between the two groups at 6- and 12-months postsurgery. Notably, neither group exhibited complications such as dura tear or spinal cord injury. Our study found that the use of UBS reduced operative time, minimized surgical bleeding, and led to clinical outcomes comparable to HSD in ACDF. This technique offers an effective and safe method of removing large retrovertebral osteophytes.


Subject(s)
Osteophyte , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Osteophyte/surgery , Blood Loss, Surgical , Ultrasonics , Spinal Fusion/methods , Treatment Outcome , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Diskectomy/methods , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery
3.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 23(1): 866, 2022 Sep 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36114532

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The one-stage posterior approach for treating spinal infection has recently been generally accepted. However, severe vertebral body loss caused by infection remains a major challenge in posterior surgery. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical application and outcomes of S1 alar screws used in the one-stage posterior surgery of short-segment lumbosacral fixation and fusion after debridement for infection with severe S1 vertebral body loss. METHODS: The clinical features and treatment outcomes of 7 patients with spinal infections from August 2016 to August 2021 who were treated with one-stage posterior surgery using S1 alar screws were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical data, including patient data, visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), fusion time and complications of the patients, were recorded. RESULTS: All 7 patients were followed up for an average duration of 14.57 months (range, 12-18 months). The VAS score decreased significantly from 7.3 preoperatively (range, 6-8) to 2.6 postoperatively (range, 2-3). The ODI score demonstrated a steady and gradual increase from 73.8 preoperatively (range, 68-75) to 33.6 postoperatively (range, 30-37). Bony fusion time was observed approximately 6.8 months after surgery. Two patients in our study experienced the postoperative local pain, which could be relieved by analgesics and disappeared 3 months after the operation. There were no complications of intraoperative fracture, posterior wound infection or neurovascular injury. CONCLUSIONS: S1 alar screws are suitable for use in the operation and could be an alternative option to S1 pedicle screws for short-segment lumbosacral fixation and fusion with severe S1 vertebral body loss caused by spinal infection, which could provide satisfactory clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Spinal Diseases , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Vertebral Body
4.
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl ; 46: 140-7, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25491970

ABSTRACT

A class of designed self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds has been shown to be a good biomimetic material in tissue engineering. Here, we specifically made a new peptide hydrogel scaffold FGLmx by mixing the pure RADA16 and designer functional peptide RADA16-FGL solution, and we analyzed the physiochemical properties of each peptide with atomic force microscopy (AFM) and circular dichroism (CD). In addition, we examined the biocompatibility and bioactivity of FGLmx as well as RADA16 scaffold on spinal cord-derived neural stem cells (SC-NSCs) isolated from neonatal rats. Our results showed that RADA16-FGL displayed a weaker ß-sheet structure and FGLmx could self-assemble into nanofibrous morphology. Moreover, we found that FGLmx was not only noncytotoxic to SC-NSCs but also promoted SC-NSC proliferation and migration into the three-dimensional (3-D) scaffold, meanwhile, the adhesion and lineage differentiation of SC-NSCs on FGLmx were similar to that on RADA16. Our results indicated that the FGL-functionalized peptide scaffold might be very beneficial for tissue engineering and suggested its further application for spinal cord injury (SCI) repair.


Subject(s)
Hydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate/chemistry , Nanofibers/chemistry , Neural Stem Cells/cytology , Peptides/chemistry , Tissue Engineering/methods , Tissue Scaffolds/chemistry , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Cell Survival , Cells, Cultured , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Spinal Cord/cytology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...