Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) in the treatment of tinnitus: protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: With an increasing incidence and significant effects on patients, tinnitus has become a major disease burden. There is a dearth of therapies with established efficacy for tinnitus. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) is being investigated as a potential therapy for tinnitus, but the current body of evidence remains inconclusive due to conflicting results across different studies. As a result, this protocol aims to synthesise and update the evidence to clarify whether ta-VNS is effective and safe for alleviating tinnitus. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs), seven representative bibliographical databases will be searched from their inception to December 2023: PubMed, Embase (via OVID), Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang Database, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, and Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database. Publications in English or Chinese will be considered for inclusion. RCTs comparing ta-VNS with active treatments, no intervention, waitlist control or sham ta-VNS in adult patients with subjective tinnitus will be included. Studies on objective tinnitus will be excluded. Primary outcome is tinnitus symptom severity measured by validated scales. With all eligible trials included, when applicable, quantitative analysis via meta-analyses will be performed using RevMan V.5.4.1 software. Otherwise, a qualitative analysis will be conducted. The methodological quality of the included RCTs will be assessed using the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Sensitivity analyses, subgroup analysis and publication bias evaluation will also be performed. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to grade the certainty of the evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review, as no primary data will be collected. The results will be reported and disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022351917.

Treating adolescent pseudomyopia and elevated intraocular pressure using chiropractic and moxibustion: A CARE-compliant case report.

RATIONALE: This case report aims to provide clinical evidence on the effectiveness of integrating chiropractic and moxibustion techniques for treating pseudomyopia accompanied by elevated intraocular pressure resulting from cervical spine issues because the application of complementary medicine modalities for managing such vision disorders currently lacks adequate investigations. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 6-year-old patient presented with blurred vision, intermittent ocular discomfort, and upper cervical discomfort. DIAGNOSES: Spine-related increased intraocular pressure and pseudomyopia. INTERVENTIONS: The patient received integrative treatment of chiropractic and walnut-shell moxibustion 3 times a week for a total of 10 treatment sessions. OUTCOMES: The patient exhibited progressive improvements in visual acuity and reductions in intraocular pressure over the treatment period, with unaided vision exceeding 2 lines of improvement in visual acuity charts and normalized intraocular pressure after 10 treatment sessions. These therapeutic effects were sustained at 3-month follow-up. LESSONS: The integrative use of chiropractic and walnut-shell moxibustion demonstrates considerable potential in alleviating symptoms of pseudomyopia, reducing intraocular pressure, and restoring visual function in spine-related pseudomyopia cases.

Evaluating the efficacy and acceptability of vagus nerve stimulation for fibromyalgia: a PRISMA-compliant protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Fibromyalgia has imposed substantial burdens on patients' health and well-being, yet effective therapeutic options for this condition remain limited. Recently, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has emerged as a promising therapy for fibromyalgia. Nonetheless, despite the increasing number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), current evidence remains inconclusive. Therefore, this protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize the existing evidence to clarify the efficacy and acceptability of VNS for treating fibromyalgia. Methods: A comprehensive search for eligible RCTs will be conducted across nine bibliographic databases, namely PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, AMED, PsycINFO, PEDro, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wangfang database. Data obtained from the included studies will be synthesized quantitively using RevMan 5.4.1 for meta-analyses. The methodological soundness of included RCTs will be assessed via the Cochrane's updated risk of bias tool (version 2.0). Additionally, sensitivity analyses, publication bias assessment, and subgroup analyses will be conducted as appropriate. Finally, we will utilize the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to evaluate the certainty for the body of evidence. Conclusion: The findings of our study are anticipated to ascertain the efficacy and acceptability of VNS as a promising treatment option for fibromyalgia. This will not only fill current research gap but also identify potential areas for future research. The findings will provide essential guidance for evidence-based treatment decisions for fibromyalgia, benefiting both patients and clinicians.