Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.

Currently used multi-step methods to incorporate genomic information in the prediction of breeding values (BV) implicitly involve many assumptions which, if violated, may result in loss of information, inaccuracies and bias. To overcome this, single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) was proposed combining pedigree, phenotype and genotype of all individuals for genetic evaluation. Our objective was to implement ssGBLUP for genomic predictions in pigs and to compare the accuracy of ssGBLUP with that of multi-step methods with empirical data of moderately sized pig breeding populations. Different predictions were performed: conventional parent average (PA), direct genomic value (DGV) calculated with genomic BLUP (GBLUP), a GEBV obtained by blending the DGV with PA, and ssGBLUP. Data comprised individuals from a German Landrace (LR) and Large White (LW) population. The trait 'number of piglets born alive' (NBA) was available for 182,054 litters of 41,090 LR sows and 15,750 litters from 4534 LW sows. The pedigree contained 174,021 animals, of which 147,461 (26,560) animals were LR (LW) animals. In total, 526 LR and 455 LW animals were genotyped with the Illumina PorcineSNP60 BeadChip. After quality control and imputation, 495 LR (424 LW) animals with 44,368 (43,678) SNP on 18 autosomes remained for the analysis. Predictive abilities, i.e., correlations between de-regressed proofs and genomic BV, were calculated with a five-fold cross validation and with a forward prediction for young genotyped validation animals born after 2011. Generally, predictive abilities for LR were rather small (0.08 for GBLUP, 0.19 for GEBV and 0.18 for ssGBLUP). For LW, ssGBLUP had the greatest predictive ability (0.45). For both breeds, assessment of reliabilities for young genotyped animals indicated that genomic prediction outperforms PA with ssGBLUP providing greater reliabilities (0.40 for LR and 0.32 for LW) than GEBV (0.35 for LR and 0.29 for LW). Grouping of animals according to information sources revealed that genomic prediction had the highest potential benefit for genotyped animals without their own phenotype. Although, ssGBLUP did not generally outperform GBLUP or GEBV, the results suggest that ssGBLUP can be a useful and conceptually convincing approach for practical genomic prediction of NBA in moderately sized LR and LW populations.

Can multi-subpopulation reference sets improve the genomic predictive ability for pigs?

In most countries and for most livestock species, genomic evaluations are obtained from within-breed analyses. To achieve reliable breeding values, however, a sufficient reference sample size is essential. To increase this size, the use of multibreed reference populations for small populations is considered a suitable option in other species. Over decades, the separate breeding work of different pig breeding organizations in Germany has led to stratified subpopulations in the breed German Large White. Due to this fact and the limited number of Large White animals available in each organization, there was a pressing need for ascertaining if multi-subpopulation genomic prediction is superior compared with within-subpopulation prediction in pigs. Direct genomic breeding values were estimated with genomic BLUP for the trait "number of piglets born alive" using genotype data (Illumina Porcine 60K SNP BeadChip) from 2,053 German Large White animals from five different commercial pig breeding companies. To assess the prediction accuracy of within- and multi-subpopulation reference sets, a random 5-fold cross-validation with 20 replications was performed. The five subpopulations considered were only slightly differentiated from each other. However, the prediction accuracy of the multi-subpopulations approach was not better than that of the within-subpopulation evaluation, for which the predictive ability was already high. Reference sets composed of closely related multi-subpopulation sets performed better than sets of distantly related subpopulations but not better than the within-subpopulation approach. Despite the low differentiation of the five subpopulations, the genetic connectedness between these different subpopulations seems to be too small to improve the prediction accuracy by applying multi-subpopulation reference sets. Consequently, resources should be used for enlarging the reference population within subpopulation, for example, by adding genotyped females.